Oliver stark

Y'all notice how they had Ryan Guzman's character on the roof by himself and barely in the whole episode, we love a good write-out chile lol

They haven't promoted him at ALL in any of the ads for the show either lmfao. Like for the longest time I was waiting for the official Twitter page to say something about Eddie and it's been crickets lmao. Even in Oliver Stark's recap of last season he didn't mention Eddie. I have a feeling they're gonna write him off. Which I'm totally okay with. I'd prefer them recast though if I'm honest. Because I do love Christopher and Buck together.
 
They haven't promoted him at ALL in any of the ads for the show either lmfao. Like for the longest time I was waiting for the official Twitter page to say something about Eddie and it's been crickets lmao. Even in Oliver Stark's recap of last season he didn't mention Eddie. I have a feeling they're gonna write him off. Which I'm totally okay with. I'd prefer them recast though if I'm honest. Because I do love Christopher and Buck together.
They might be making his role smaller to eventually write him off because of all the racist controversies him and his wife had during lock down a lot of the cast didn’t like what was said by him and how he handled it
 
This whole racism thing has gone too far, yes the N word is bad, its demeaning and its racist. BUT context should be taken into consideration. If he called someone N WORD to insult them then YES he is being a racist, but he just said he calls his friends playfully like black people do to each other. Yes its bad to appropriate a culture but no he ain't a racist if you ask me. For me a racist is someone who continuously attacks another's race and says demeaning things with the intent to harm people either psychologically or even physically. Don't attack me please. I just say what's on my mind :/
 
This whole racism thing has gone too far, yes the N word is bad, its demeaning and its racist. BUT context should be taken into consideration. If he called someone N WORD to insult them then YES he is being a racist, but he just said he calls his friends playfully like black people do to each other. Yes its bad to appropriate a culture but no he ain't a racist if you ask me. For me a racist is someone who continuously attacks another's race and says demeaning things with the intent to harm people either psychologically or even physically. Don't attack me please. I just say what's on my mind :/

So your misunderstanding of what is and is not racism is actually very common and one of the reasons why so many people are so against the institutional change that is frankly necessary to help right the centuries of wrongdoing against Black people. Firstly, assuming you're a white person (or at least not Black), you may think that you know what racism is, but as someone who has never experienced it directed towards them (or even the specific racism towards Black people if you are a non-Black POC), you do not. Secondly, racism is not always obvious. While being verbally and physically abusive towards someone because of their race is indeed racism, so is making assumptions about someone based on their race or generalizing about an entire group of people. For example, it is racist to say you are not attracted to Black men. Black people don't all look alike, they don't all have the same characteristics. Therefore, to write off an entire race of people as "unattractive" is racist, despite what some masc white gays might think/say. Although not finding Black men attractive might not seem harmful, it has the effect of "othering", and thus dehumanizing them. Additionally, though people might say their reasoning is based on physical preference, it is more likely to be a result of societal pressures and norms to which that person has been exposed. This is the same reason why many white Americans generalize about black people as being poor, lazy, etc. It is also the reason why many Black people have negative opinions of their own appearance. Through media, historical narratives, even toys, white American society reinforces stereotypes as well as the idea of white people being the default and preferable to other kinds of people. If we go back to the issue at hand, the controversy seems to stem from Guzman's wife (who is from Brazil, a country well known for its racism and for being the last country in the western world to abolish slavery in 1888) calling people the n-word on social media and in person. Although her intent may not have been racist (although this is debatable), the action itself is still racist. The n-word developed into a slur because white Europeans used it to demean Black slaves during the colonial period. Therefore, its use by a white (or non-Black) person, in any context, is still racist.
 
So your misunderstanding of what is and is not racism is actually very common and one of the reasons why so many people are so against the institutional change that is frankly necessary to help right the centuries of wrongdoing against Black people. Firstly, assuming you're a white person (or at least not Black), you may think that you know what racism is, but as someone who has never experienced it directed towards them (or even the specific racism towards Black people if you are a non-Black POC), you do not. Secondly, racism is not always obvious. While being verbally and physically abusive towards someone because of their race is indeed racism, so is making assumptions about someone based on their race or generalizing about an entire group of people. For example, it is racist to say you are not attracted to Black men. Black people don't all look alike, they don't all have the same characteristics. Therefore, to write off an entire race of people as "unattractive" is racist, despite what some masc white gays might think/say. Although not finding Black men attractive might not seem harmful, it has the effect of "othering", and thus dehumanizing them. Additionally, though people might say their reasoning is based on physical preference, it is more likely to be a result of societal pressures and norms to which that person has been exposed. This is the same reason why many white Americans generalize about black people as being poor, lazy, etc. It is also the reason why many Black people have negative opinions of their own appearance. Through media, historical narratives, even toys, white American society reinforces stereotypes as well as the idea of white people being the default and preferable to other kinds of people. If we go back to the issue at hand, the controversy seems to stem from Guzman's wife (who is from Brazil, a country well known for its racism and for being the last country in the western world to abolish slavery in 1888) calling people the n-word on social media and in person. Although her intent may not have been racist (although this is debatable), the action itself is still racist. The n-word developed into a slur because white Europeans used it to demean Black slaves during the colonial period. Therefore, its use by a white (or non-Black) person, in any context, is still racist.
Ok reading this I realized I was wrong and in my mind it seemed simple yet I see now that its not... :/ Sorry.
 
  • Like
Reactions: deleted15825581
This whole racism thing has gone too far, yes the N word is bad, its demeaning and its racist. BUT context should be taken into consideration. If he called someone N WORD to insult them then YES he is being a racist, but he just said he calls his friends playfully like black people do to each other. Yes its bad to appropriate a culture but no he ain't a racist if you ask me. For me a racist is someone who continuously attacks another's race and says demeaning things with the intent to harm people either psychologically or even physically. Don't attack me please. I just say what's on my mind :/
I don't think he is racist; however, most Hollywood productions bow to pressure when it comes to firing anyone who upsets the woke social media warriors.
 
I don't think he is racist; however, most Hollywood productions bow to pressure when it comes to firing anyone who upsets the woke social media warriors.

Yeah god forbid people are held accountable for their shitty actions
 
So your misunderstanding of what is and is not racism is actually very common and one of the reasons why so many people are so against the institutional change that is frankly necessary to help right the centuries of wrongdoing against Black people. Firstly, assuming you're a white person (or at least not Black), you may think that you know what racism is, but as someone who has never experienced it directed towards them (or even the specific racism towards Black people if you are a non-Black POC), you do not. Secondly, racism is not always obvious. While being verbally and physically abusive towards someone because of their race is indeed racism, so is making assumptions about someone based on their race or generalizing about an entire group of people. For example, it is racist to say you are not attracted to Black men. Black people don't all look alike, they don't all have the same characteristics. Therefore, to write off an entire race of people as "unattractive" is racist, despite what some masc white gays might think/say. Although not finding Black men attractive might not seem harmful, it has the effect of "othering", and thus dehumanizing them. Additionally, though people might say their reasoning is based on physical preference, it is more likely to be a result of societal pressures and norms to which that person has been exposed. This is the same reason why many white Americans generalize about black people as being poor, lazy, etc. It is also the reason why many Black people have negative opinions of their own appearance. Through media, historical narratives, even toys, white American society reinforces stereotypes as well as the idea of white people being the default and preferable to other kinds of people. If we go back to the issue at hand, the controversy seems to stem from Guzman's wife (who is from Brazil, a country well known for its racism and for being the last country in the western world to abolish slavery in 1888) calling people the n-word on social media and in person. Although her intent may not have been racist (although this is debatable), the action itself is still racist. The n-word developed into a slur because white Europeans used it to demean Black slaves during the colonial period. Therefore, its use by a white (or non-Black) person, in any context, is still racist.
Thank you for taking the time to lay all of this out. I really appreciate it
 
  • Like
Reactions: deleted15825581
I don't think he is racist; however, most Hollywood productions bow to pressure when it comes to firing anyone who upsets the woke social media warriors.
Or did he upset an entire community including his co stars lmfao ignorance at its finest right here
 
The n-word developed into a slur because white Europeans used it to demean Black slaves during the colonial period. Therefore, its use by a white (or non-Black) person, in any context, is still racist.
In a way maybe, but calling your friend bitch or slut or any other offensive word that you don't really mean is then also should be considered insulting?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Bazinga1997
Who watched the newest episode? It seems they’re hinting at a bisexual storyline and i’m here for it!
I really wish they'd finally make Buddie happen, give the viewers what we really want heh
 
I'm not trying to like... crap on anyone's hopes but... I very highly doubt it's related to his sexuality lol. And as someone who is pansexual while there has been some very LIGHT queer-baiting in this show, in my honest opinion there has been no true hints that either Buck or Eddie are queer characters lol. As fun as that would be, i feel like people are grasping at straws.

I'd welcome it if I'm wrong, but I feel like it's just stans overreacting whenever they've stared at each other for a second too long haha.