Onlyfans List of DRM users & Non-users

[ShaitanIblis]

For the record I do not condone the downloading and especially resharing of creators’ content, and I honestly hate seeing comments on here like “if I bought a DVD I own it for life” because Onlyfans is not like buying a DVD, it’s like buying a Netflix subscription. You can’t pay $14 one time and watch all four seasons of Stranger Things any time you want for the rest of your life. You are renting access to this content.

@MGReviews If I were to make an analogy... For years, it has now been possible to legally purchase a digital music album on various platforms such as iTunes, Qobuz, Amazon, etc. On average, the price of a full-length studio, live or compilation digital album varies from $5 to $20. Once downloaded, the files are the customers' to keep. Making the album requires much time and effort and can cost the artists and labels tens or even hundreds of thousands of dollars, but the material can be owned for personal use.

You may have noticed how almost all adult studio websites (Falcon Studios / Hot House, Men.com, SeanCody.com, BrokeStraightBoys / CollegeBoyPhysicals, Raw Alpha Males, Lucas Entertainment, TimTales, TIMFuck, Randy Blue, Bel Ami Online, Corbin Fisher, ASGmax [incl. Disruptive Films, NextDoor Studios and tons more], etc.) allow customers to download to keep. Many if not most consumers would not join if there were no download option. Piracy does occur (those vids may end up on pirate sites), but one always gets more with a subscription (ease of browsing, selection and access, highest quality available).

Besides, when you think of it, most paying members would not want to spend monthly dollars on a portal just to have everything or most everything be made available on illegal platforms for free! They'd rather the content remain exclusive to the paying customers. It's only a few who may choose to illegally distribute it—either because they make ad/affiliate money off their illegal platform or they just think they're doing porn fans a favour. I agree such distribution must be stopped, but I don't think that fans should be prevented from downloading.


And as I expressed above, downloading has its advantages:

1. Viewing the material offline. That can be practical if on a trip and there's no wi-fi, there's a power outage, the Internet connection is slow or interrupted, the website is down.

2. Viewing it on one's own media player. VLC has a great A–B loop option that allows to view a particular segment of a scene in a loop. Sometimes, a scene only has those 10 seconds or those two minutes I really want to get off to. I usually watch in full, and I then rewatch my favourite parts. Having the file, I can play it on a TV screen (incl. giant screens) via USB or else.

3. Retaining lifelong access. Besides, if it's a PPV, presale or custom purchase, downloading should definitely be made available.


And finally, if we're going to get that technical, even saving photos on those homemade portals may be "proscribed," not just videos.

Downloading some photos makes it much more easy and quick to access them rather than spending a lot of minutes trying to locate that photo that was posted four years ago or that other photo from that other model that was posted eight months ago, etc.

@Mickactual

 

[MGReviews]

I’m curious about Axels page & how this works? So he offers the video as a paid version in DM or on his wall? I’m very interested in doing something like this! I’ve always just put all my content for free on my wall and thought I was doing the damn thing lmfao. I tried to get started with a secondary ‘free OF’ that would’ve had all the content listed for PPV but i keep forgetting about it and get sidetracked with other tasks. But what you’re saying sounds much easier not having to manage two accounts & upload separately to both.

Here’s how Axel describes it on his page:

This post is pinned at the top and visible before subscribing. I love that it’s so up front and crystal clear. Basically, any free video on the page can optionally be purchased to keep forever for $6, or a discounted $3 if you were auto-renewed at the time of its initial release. These purchase links get sent out in DMs automatically on release, but you can message him anytime to request an older one from before you subbed.

And because his posts are visible to non-subscribers, you can look through his page and check before you sub exactly which videos are free versus which ones are PPV-only. He even has a filter for each type so you can view the full lists separately. You can view it without subbing so I recommend checking it out to see what I mean, all in all it’s the most impeccably organized and professional page I’ve ever seen.

Thank you for the compliments & well wishes! I take this work very seriously and it’s always nice when that can be acknowledged in some form. I’ve learned some things on this thread & I’m happy we had this convo

I can tell you do take this seriously and I’m happy to be of help!

 

[MGReviews]

Sorry to shine in where my opinion hasn't particularly been requested, but I have to respectfully disagree with this paragraph.
Onlyfans is most definitely not Netflix or Blockbuster Video. As a buyer, if I pay for a page subscription then pay an additional $10 ($20 $50 $100?) for a video, I've bought a video. Period. And I expect to be able to download that video onto my HD and view it whenever I wish.

I appreciate and respect the situation parkerwoodsx is in, as well as the explanation he was kind enough to offer. It's his page and his content, and he can choose to do what he wishes to protect his livelihood. I personally choose not to subscribe to pages I know have DRM enabled. He's done the best thing that can be done at present by being transparent upfront that DRM is enabled. Until such time as OF can come up with a system that punishes neither creators nor subscribers, I'd hope to see all creators be equally transparent so the buyer can make an informed decision. Better yet, OF themselves should make this information visible on subscription pages.

@MGReviews If I were to make an analogy... For years, it has now been possible to legally purchase a digital music album on various platforms such as iTunes, Qobuz, Amazon, etc. On average, the price of a full-length studio, live or compilation digital album varies from $5 to $20. Once downloaded, the files are the customers' to keep. Making the album requires much time and effort and can cost the artists and labels tens or even hundreds of thousands of dollars, but the material can be owned for personal use.

You may have noticed how almost all adult studio websites (Falcon Studios / Hot House, Men.com, SeanCody.com, BrokeStraightBoys / CollegeBoyPhysicals, Raw Alpha Males, Lucas Entertainment, TimTales, TIMFuck, Randy Blue, Bel Ami Online, Corbin Fisher, ASGmax [incl. Disruptive Films, NextDoor Studios and tons more], etc.) allow customers to download to keep. Many if not most consumers would not join if there were no download option. Piracy does occur (those vids may end up on pirate sites), but one always gets more with a subscription (ease of browsing, selection and access, highest quality available).

Besides, when you think of it, most paying members would not want to spend monthly dollars on a portal just to have everything or most everything be made available on illegal platforms for free! They'd rather the content remain exclusive to the paying customers. It's only a few who may choose to illegally distribute it—either because they make ad/affiliate money off their illegal platform or they just think they're doing porn fans a favour. I agree such distribution must be stopped, but I don't think that fans should be prevented from downloading.


And as I expressed above, downloading has its advantages:

1. Viewing the material offline. That can be practical if on a trip and there's no wi-fi, there's a power outage, the Internet connection is slow or interrupted, the website is down.

2. Viewing it on one's own media player. VLC has a great A–B loop option that allows to view a particular segment of a scene in a loop. Sometimes, a scene only has those 10 seconds or those two minutes I really want to get off to. I usually watch in full, and I then rewatch my favourite parts. Having the file, I can play it on a TV screen (incl. giant screens) via USB or else.

3. Retaining lifelong access. Besides, if it's a PPV, presale or custom purchase, downloading should definitely be made available.


And finally, if we're going to get that technical, even saving photos on those homemade portals may be "proscribed," not just videos.

Downloading some photos makes it much more easy and quick to access them rather than spending a lot of minutes trying to locate that photo that was posted four years ago or that other photo from that other model that was posted eight months ago, etc.

@Mickactual

So here’s my thing, and just respectfully explaining here, there’s a difference between paying for a service and paying for a product or general downloadability. And honestly, this applies to the Netflix example as well. I should be able to purchase a physical copy of Stranger Things on DVD or at least a hard download if I love that particular show and want to own it forever without having to pay a recurring subscription for life. But Netflix doesn’t give us that option because they’re greedy bastards who want that permanent monthly income, and OF does the same thing. But even if I did have the option to do that, it would cost significantly more than the price of a regular Netflix subscription because I am paying for ownership of a product rather than rental of a service.

So let’s use iTunes and Apple Music as an example for comparison since it actually does offer both. While it’s true that you are allowed to download an album to own forever, you have to account for the differences in price/value. For approximately $10, you can purchase either an AM subscription to all music on the platform at your disposal for one month, or one singular album that you get to own forever. When you subscribe to an OF page, that subscription fee works like the former and is typically priced in that way. It is not economically reasonable to say that $10 (the average cost of a page sub) should mean you get to download years’ worth of the creator’s content on that page for life. I can absolutely purchase the Beatles’ entire discography to own if I want to, but they have a ton of music so it’s gonna cost a lot more than $10 to do so.

I do totally agree with the point about how adult studio sites allow you to download content and would love if OF worked this way too. However even then, similar to the iTunes example, this ability to download is almost always an additional fee that costs more than a regularly monthly sub (or at least requires commitment to a full annual subscription) to account for the fact that you are now paying for the product, not just the service. I think this is completely fair, and this is how OF and Netflix should work as well. It’s just unfortunate that they do not work that way, so as it stands there is no legal way to download content from either.

Now when it does come to illegal downloads and the ethics of such, pirating from Netflix is one thing, because when you pay for their subscription your money is always going to the corporation at large and not the individual creatives who made the show you like. Those people were already paid by Netflix. Whereas OF creators do not profit unless people are paying to see their content specifically. This is the main difference I see between them and is the reason I think it’s more unethical to pirate from OF than from Netflix.

All that to finally loop back to how I personally think that Axel’s system is the best and is the closest we can get to how things should work. Like the iTunes/AM example, he offers all of his content as either an all-inclusive subscription or individual permanent downloads. I think $10/month for access, then $3-6 for permanent ownership of one singular product is a very fair price point that works similarly to buying an album or a DVD.

I know that was a lot and naturally people don’t have to agree with me, but that’s just my personal thoughts about how this industry could be as fair as possible to both creators and fans.

 

[MGReviews]

Basically, any free video on the page can optionally be purchased to keep forever for $6, or a discounted $3 if you were auto-renewed at the time of its initial release. These purchase links get sent out in DMs automatically on release, but you can message him anytime to request an older one from before you subbed.

I read his post again and I think I misexplained this actually. It sounds more like all free videos are $3 to permanently purchase, and the $6 fee is for early access. So that’s even better for the consumer in my opinion lol. Sorry to Axel if he ever sees this and I got it wrong lol

 

[ShaitanIblis]

I do totally agree with the point about how adult studio sites allow you to download content and would love if OF worked this way too. However even then, similar to the iTunes example, this ability to download is almost always an additional fee that costs more than a regularly monthly sub (or at least requires commitment to a full annual subscription) to account for the fact that you are now paying for the product, not just the service. I think this is completely fair, and this is how OF and Netflix should work as well. It’s just unfortunate that they do not work that way, so as it stands there is no legal way to download content from either.

Almost always? Not sure about that! Some adult studio sites charge an additional fee to upgrade and unlock downloads forever. For instance, on Men.com and SeanCody.com, it is possible to upgrade and unlock downloads for $99.99 per year, which amounts to $8.33 per month.

Some studio sites (a minority) do not offer downloads.

Some studio sites (TIMFuck, Voyr, Menoboy, Catholic Boys, Eurocreme, House of Angell, Raw Fuck Club, etc.) charge extra to download.

Some studio sites (ASGmax + 71 related sites/channels, Falcon Studios, Hot House, Raging Stallion, etc.) gives customers the choice to choose a subscription that is streaming only or streaming + downloads.

But apparently, many more sites (Corbin Fisher, Bel Ami Online, BrokeStraightBoys, CollegeBoyPhysicals, RawAlphaMales, Lucas Entertainment, Fisting Inferno, TimTales, Bi Latin Men, Latin Boyz, Red Hot Straight Boys, Kristen Bjorn, Lads Feet, Manpuppy, Bi Witched, Male Celebs, BadPuppy, Touch That Boy, GloryHole Hookup, Cutler's Den, Gay Hoopla, Ayor Studios, Beefcake Hunter, Cocky Boys, HimEros, Military Classified, Bareback Latinoz, Guys In Sweatpants, BoyNapped, Asian Twink Network, My Friends' Feet, My Dirtiest Fantasy, Gay Asian Pass, Randy Blue, Male Feet 4 U, Pride Studios, Enigmatic Boys, William Higgins, and so on) have downloads included for the subscription price and do not charge any extra or upgrade for that.

I've just looked up that information based on my own subscriptions and recent reviews by the owner of the GayDemon blog. So it truly does not appear that "this ability to download is almost always an additional fee that costs more than a regularly monthly sub."

 

[BDBailey]

Creators, yes, you don't want your content bulk downloaded and reposted for sale by someone else. That, of course, is illegal. But I don't think that happens as much as you think it does. I have never seen a site offering anything like that. Why punish the probably 99% of your subs who do not repost any thing they save?

And, if an occasional pic or vid is reposted as many have been here on LPSG, it often serves a advertising. I have subbed to many creators after I saw a pic or vid of them here, simply because I wanted more. I've always though creators who demand this site take down all vids or pics of them that are posted here are being 'penny wise and pound foolish'. I for one won't sub to site without some example of what to expect.

Of course, that's another one of OF's many faults: not allowing any kind of preview.

 

[ShaitanIblis]

Of course, that's another one of OF's many faults: not allowing any kind of preview.

Yeah. Many accounts on there have everything behind a locker, even when sending PPV messages... On JFF, you can at least always see the running time of each video and its posting date. That way, you can have an idea of how frequently the portal is updated and how long vids are. It also tells you before joining if it's all or mostly all PPV (on JFF, if it's PPV, the full video will not appear on the model's main page).

Besides, many models on JFF allow short previews and/or captions to be seen before joining.

Creators, yes, you don't want your content bulk downloaded and reposted for sale by someone else. That, of course, is illegal. But I don't think that happens as much as you think it does. I have never seen a site offering anything like that.

Some illegal portals do post a lot of privately shared media for free... GayForFans is one of them. That portal has a DMCA link at the bottom that allows content creators to request removal, but yeah, that portal and many tube sites and certain forums host a lot of content without any authorization from the rights owners.

I've always though creators who demand this site take down all vids or pics of them that are posted here are being 'penny wise and pound foolish'. I for one won't sub to site without some example of what to expect.

Many models and studios, incl. Parker Woods (X, JFF, OF) post loads of previews and photos on X, so you can have a great idea of what to expect before you subscribe.

 

[rikku99]

Creators, yes, you don't want your content bulk downloaded and reposted for sale by someone else. That, of course, is illegal. But I don't think that happens as much as you think it does. I have never seen a site offering anything like that. Why punish the probably 99% of your subs who do not repost any thing they save?

And, if an occasional pic or vid is reposted as many have been here on LPSG, it often serves a advertising. I have subbed to many creators after I saw a pic or vid of them here, simply because I wanted more. I've always though creators who demand this site take down all vids or pics of them that are posted here are being 'penny wise and pound foolish'. I for one won't sub to site without some example of what to expect.

Of course, that's another one of OF's many faults: not allowing any kind of preview.

The one vague preview they do have, which was how many videos and photos a page has, now has an option to be hidden! Making it another tool for scammers to utilize.

 

[parkerwoodsx]

Yeah. Many accounts on there have everything behind a locker, even when sending PPV messages... On JFF, you can at least always see the running time of each video and its posting date. That way, you can have an idea of how frequently the portal is updated and how long vids are. It also tells you before joining if it's all or mostly all PPV (on JFF, if it's PPV, the full video will not appear on the model's main page).

Besides, many models on JFF allow short previews and/or captions to be seen before joining.



Some illegal portals do post a lot of privately shared media for free... GayForFans is one of them. That portal has a DMCA link at the bottom that allows content creators to request removal, but yeah, that portal and many tube sites and certain forums host a lot of content without any authorization from the rights owners.



Many models and studios, incl. Parker Woods (X, JFF, OF) post loads of previews and photos on X, so you can have a great idea of what to expect before you subscribe.

I absolutely hate. gayforfans and i’m so glad you mentioned them as an example. The website owner has refused my requests for removal for years. I can’t even get any form of a response. I blocked the person i suspected on OF. I’m glad yall brought them up bc they’re horrible to creators. they were actually the first website i found that leaked directly from my OF & i had such a meltdown. not even 6 months into my time as a creator, i was STRESSED lol.

Also thank you for the lil shoutout at the end

 

[ShaitanIblis]

I absolutely hate. gayforfans and i’m so glad you mentioned them as an example. The website owner has refused my requests for removal for years. I can’t even get any form of a response. I blocked the person i suspected on OF. I’m glad yall brought them up bc they’re horrible to creators. they were actually the first website i found that leaked directly from my OF & i had such a meltdown. not even 6 months into my time as a creator, i was STRESSED lol.

Also thank you for the lil shoutout at the end

Maybe you should get a lawyer involved. So many creators' content are on that site that you could surely launch a class action lawsuit (at the WIPO maybe) against whoever is behind that site.

 

[ShaitanIblis]

I absolutely hate. gayforfans and i’m so glad you mentioned them as an example. The website owner has refused my requests for removal for years. I can’t even get any form of a response. I blocked the person i suspected on OF. I’m glad yall brought them up bc they’re horrible to creators. they were actually the first website i found that leaked directly from my OF & i had such a meltdown. not even 6 months into my time as a creator, i was STRESSED lol.

Also thank you for the lil shoutout at the end

And, yes, as I suspected, that illegal website makes tons of money via ads and affiliate programs.

They'd be taken down if a lot of the models on there filed complaints w/ the WIPO and other authorities.

 

[jonnyj]

Almost always? Not sure about that! Some adult studio sites charge an additional fee to upgrade and unlock downloads forever. For instance, on Men.com and SeanCody.com, it is possible to upgrade and unlock downloads for $99.99 per year, which amounts to $8.33 per month.

View attachment 142242801

Some studio sites (a minority) do not offer downloads.

Some studio sites (TIMFuck, Voyr, Menoboy, Catholic Boys, Eurocreme, House of Angell, Raw Fuck Club, etc.) charge extra to download.

Some studio sites (ASGmax + 71 related sites/channels, Falcon Studios, Hot House, Raging Stallion, etc.) gives customers the choice to choose a subscription that is streaming only or streaming + downloads.

But apparently, many more sites (Corbin Fisher, Bel Ami Online, BrokeStraightBoys, CollegeBoyPhysicals, RawAlphaMales, Lucas Entertainment, Fisting Inferno, TimTales, Bi Latin Men, Latin Boyz, Red Hot Straight Boys, Kristen Bjorn, Lads Feet, Manpuppy, Bi Witched, Male Celebs, BadPuppy, Touch That Boy, GloryHole Hookup, Cutler's Den, Gay Hoopla, Ayor Studios, Beefcake Hunter, Cocky Boys, HimEros, Military Classified, Bareback Latinoz, Guys In Sweatpants, BoyNapped, Asian Twink Network, My Friends' Feet, My Dirtiest Fantasy, Gay Asian Pass, Randy Blue, Male Feet 4 U, Pride Studios, Enigmatic Boys, William Higgins, and so on) have downloads included for the subscription price and do not charge any extra or upgrade for that.

I've just looked up that information based on my own subscriptions and recent reviews by the owner of the GayDemon blog. So it truly does not appear that "this ability to download is almost always an additional fee that costs more than a regularly monthly sub."

English lads went full DRM about 3 years ago it's why i walked away after being a sub for over 10 years

 

[MGReviews]

Almost always? Not sure about that! Some adult studio sites charge an additional fee to upgrade and unlock downloads forever. For instance, on Men.com and SeanCody.com, it is possible to upgrade and unlock downloads for $99.99 per year, which amounts to $8.33 per month.

That’s not what I mean by “forever.” You get to keep whatever videos you download forever (because of course you do, they can’t come to your house and erase your hard drive), but you’re paying $99.99 to have the ability to download for one year, and that’s an additional charge on top of your regular streaming subscription. I have an annual subscription to Men.com but I cannot download anything there because I do not pay that extra fee. And notice that they don’t give you an option to pay for it for one month, you have to make a major commitment, which I also mentioned. Even on sites that include downloads with streaming you often must pay up front for an annual subscription or pay for a higher tier in order to have access to downloads, meaning you can’t just pay the base price for the site for one month and download the entire catalog for only $10-30. There are always exceptions for sure, but the point stands that it’s not unusual at all for download access to cost more than streaming-only.

 

[ShaitanIblis]

That’s not what I mean by “forever.” You get to keep whatever videos you download forever (because of course you do, they can’t come to your house and erase your hard drive), but you’re paying $99.99 to have the ability to download for one year, and that’s an additional charge on top of your regular streaming subscription. I have an annual subscription to Men.com but I cannot download anything there because I do not pay that extra fee. And notice that they don’t give you an option to pay for it for one month, you have to make a major commitment, which I also mentioned. Even on sites that include downloads with streaming you often must pay up front for an annual subscription or pay for a higher tier in order to have access to downloads, meaning you can’t just pay the base price for the site for one month and download the entire catalog for only $10-30. There are always exceptions for sure, but the point stands that it’s not unusual at all for download access to cost more than streaming-only.

You're right in regard to Men.com (and SeanCody.com). I just called ProBiller to confirm, and the monthly or yearly download upgrade is a separate subscription in addition to the streaming subscription.

I have a monthly subscription to each site: lifetime special of $8.94 per month (sales tax included) for MEN, and lifetime special of $19.94 per month (sales tax included) for SeanCody. Neither subscription includes downloads—both are streaming-only.

That said (I've just checked again), the DRM in place is not rigid, and I'mma leave it at that.


As for the websites I listed above as "having downloads included for the subscription price and not charging any extra or upgrade for that," one can join and download anything for that same subscription price.

A few of those sites may impose a download limit per day or for the first month of subscription, but most do not impose any such limit at all. Once again, I am referring to that specific list, the longest one. This is why I'm saying that most studio websites do allow downloads for the monthly (or yearly) submission price only.


In my case, when I subscribed to Falcon Studios / Hot House in July 2021, my subscription was streaming only; it was a one month special for $5 (+ sales tax for a total of $5.75).

The second month (August 2021), it was automatically renewed for $24.95 (+ sales tax for a total of $28.69).

I then contacted customer service to negotiate a new deal; as of the third month (Sep. 2021), my monthly subscription was reduced to $14.95 (+ sales tax for a total of $17.19) and upgraded to include downloads, and that's all I've been paying monthly ever since: $17.19 for streaming + downloads only—no other charge.


My monthly subscriptions to Raw Alpha Males (lifetime $7.95 special, no sales tax) and BrokeStraightBoys / CollegeBoyPhysicals (lifetime $9.95 special, no sales tax) always cost me just that for streaming + downloads—no other charge. The GayDemon review says that BSB/ CBP imposes a limit of 15 downloads per day, but I never download all that much daily.

 

[Turjun]

Jey Mx - jeymx / jeymx23 has DMR On

 

[fearlessfool]

A few more reviews from some accounts I have followed for a while or were curious about that offered discounts. And no, please do not ask for me to share content.

hazel_hoffman OF | X
381 Vids / 1339 Pics. DRM-OFF. Gay gym guy. Posts almost daily. Vids are are all short - >15 seconds - almost all teasers for PPV (~$20); a few full-length solo and collab vids. Good angles and lighting. I caught his account when he had a free preview day. Collabs are hot, but not sure I would pay for them on top of a subscription. Do not recommend.

King_Tylor OF | X
135 Vids / 509 Photos. DRM-OFF. Bi/Straight(?) gym guy. Posts 2-3x a week. Vids are are all short - ~30 seconds - almost all teasers for PPV ($15-25). Good angles and lighting. I caught him while his account was on sale. Terribly disappointed as he's a hot guy. Do not recommend. He has a lot of content featuring his feet if you're into that.

lucaambrose OF | X
111 Vids / 364 Pics. DRM-OFF. Gay twink. Posts multiple times a week. Mix of short vids, teasers for PPV; a few longer solo and collab vids. Mostly good angles and lighting. I caught him while his account was on sale. Cute guy and enjoyable collabs. A little off-put by the volume of PPV (though they're pretty inexpensive ~$15), but he sometimes will release the longer vid later. On the fence with this one. I may keep tabs and resubscribe later.

ashton_grey OF | X
82 Vids / 128 Pics. DRM-ON. Gay twink. Posts 1-2x a week. Vids are a goodly length. Some PPV (collab). Good angles and lighting. I caught him while his account was on sale. Most of the vids are self-sucking with some self-fucking. I'm tempted to pay for his collab. One to keep an eye on, but be aware it's almost excuslively solo content.

leonmike17 OF | X
275 Vids / 16 Pics. DRM-ON. Gay twink / twunk couple. Posts pretty regularly, at least 1x a week, sometimes 2-3x. Vids are generally on the longer side, all collabs between the couple or some solos content. No PPV. Good angles and lighting, generally. Again, caught them when they had a discount going. Really hot, sensual vids - some great, raw sex. Highly recommend, probably one of the hotest couples/accounts I've subscribed to on OF.

william_mann01 OF | X
524 Vids / 1160 Pics. *Note: his numbers are inflated by posting content from his friends. DRM-ON. Gay/Bi(?) gym bro. Posts daily. 90% of vids are short teasers for PPV, >30 seconds; mix of collabs and solo. Some older vids are a little longer. Professional quality vids. PPV is pricy (~$40-$50) - vids are what one might consider a scene for a longer vid. I subbed when he had a discount and after seeing a teaser of a collab he filmed with someone else I followed. I was woefully disappointed to see how short the vids are and how expensive the PPV is. Some may enjoy his pics, but I'm more interested in vid content and would not recommend subscribing.

msk616x OF | X
84 Vids / 21 Pics / 2 Audio. DRM-ON. Gay(?) twink. Vids are all short, >10 seconds, solo. PPV is pretty inexpensive (~$5-10). His PPV appear to be pretty hot solo content, so if you don't mind shelling out a little bit for it, then you may find it's worth it. I've had a free subscription to him since 2022 but he's about to start charging a monthly subscription. His Twitter doesn't give much in way of content, so if like cute Asian twinks, then it may be worth checking out.

pabletcastaneda OF | X
1704 Vids / 277 Pics. DRM-OFF. Gay twink. Posts multiple times a day. Vids are 95% collabs, with a few solo in the mix and mostly lengthy, with some short teasers for upcoming content. Has some PPV, but I think he later posts the vids. Lighting and angles are kinda average. One annoying feature of this account is he will post 4-5 vids / pieces of a scene with a guy rather than just one longer vid of the entire encounter. It's a minor gripe, though. Most of his collaborators are pretty attractive guys, but it's kinda all over the place with other twinks, otters, and a few bears. It's pretty enjoyable content, but starts to feel a little repetitive after a while - the same shots, angles, or sex positions. I recommend him if you're a fan of his Twitter; I'll probably check-in again.

traviesso5 OF | X
504 Vids / 299 Pics. *Note: his numbers are inflated a bit by posting content from his friends or just text posts. DRM-ON. Gay twink. PPV (~$12). Posts a few times a month. Vids are mostly collabs. Recent vids a mix of short (>30 sec) and lengthy - older content is shorter (1-2 min). Lighting is good, angles are okay. I've enjoyed his teasers on Twitter for a while and decided to take advantage of his discount. I'm a bit disappoitned that there's PPV and how many short vids there are. I'd say that if you really like his Twitter content, wait for him to offer another discount (he does frequently); otherwise, give him a pass.

 

[peachiz2019]

My streamfan now only get 240p when they turn on DRM...
Is there anyone who can download them with high quality like 1080p

YT saver is great and theit customer service and response is on point. They are constantly updating to ensure thier platform works. 2 updates ago all of a sudden i was not able to download drm onlyfans videos i sent an email and literally they responded later that day and asked what version i had an i relayed i had the latest version and their tech team looked into it and literally released an update the next day and VIOLA it was fixed. they are awesome

 

[Albino Adonis]

I don't think mine is active.

 

[peachiz2019]

I don't think mine is active.

What do you mean?

 

[Albino Adonis]

I am saying I dont think I have DRM active on my OF or any of my other sites. I could be wrong though. Not sure.