Onlyfans Pages That Aren't Worth It.

[dave in oz]

Ok. But then surely the question should be raised of why should you be getting it free in the first place? You’ve been enjoying it for free, and the creator gets nothing. So start paying up x

Thats like saying you should be paying a $1 for a long movie trailer. You have enjoyed part of the movie right?

The excerpts are advertising to encourage you to the site to pay a subscription. Thats exactly why they use twitter - its their marketing machine.

They infer there is more to see and more available when in fact there isn't unless you then pay an exorbitant amount for a video in most cases.

The site itself will tell you there are 100 videos however does not allow you to see the length of them unless the creator allows that. Most don't because, as I said they 10 second excerpts and not what I want or paid for so you go in blind, assuming this creator you like is being fair about what they are doing.

The creators are fine believe me - they have learned that gay men can be dumbasses when it comes to porn and know how to milk it.

 

[MustYouDoThat]

Getting back to the topic at hand... jimmy_only is hot and his page is free, BUT he charges up to $50 for a video that's barely 2 minutes long. Also, you can't message him unless you tip. Ridiculous.

 

[dave in oz]

Getting back to the topic at hand... jimmy_only is hot and his page is free, BUT he charges up to $50 for a video that's barely 2 minutes long. Also, you can't message him unless you tip. Ridiculous.

Either he is doing REALLY well or he is broke

 

[deleted1600401]

Hiya. A public debate isn’t a controversy. And your exact wording is as follows: VERY FEW are worth $5/month.

I’m not too sure what I misread to be fair, given your exact words.

You misread the context and my words. The Onlyfans pages, the subject of this thread--i.e., the content on the pages--aren't worth $5/month. NOT people themselves. There is nothing to debate. It's not complicated--the thread isn't "People aren't worth it," but "Onlyfans Pages." Context is everything. Reading comprehension is fundamental. Sheesh.

 

[rikku99]

This guy toffs25 on Reddit and uncutgreeksud on OnlyFans
He does the whole tip to view the whole video thing. He restricted me when I voiced a complaint. He knew blocking me would give me a refund. Onlyfans isn’t going to refund me but here’s a warning. He doesn’t show face if you were curious. There’s possibly 3 cum videos out of the 48 on his page. Not worth it all when there’s other creators actually putting effort in their pages.

 

[cherryboom66]

You misread the context and my words. The Onlyfans pages, the subject of this thread--i.e., the content on the pages--aren't worth $5/month. NOT people themselves. There is nothing to debate. It's not complicated--the thread isn't "People aren't worth it," but "Onlyfans Pages." Context is everything. Reading comprehension is fundamental. Sheesh.

4.99 for a whole month is actual pennies. 16 pennies a day. Giving pennies to a content creator you admire, then saying they aren’t even worth those pennies? It’s just wild and unnecessary rude.

it makes me think of the pandemic, with entertainers, drag queens, using the platform to try and make money for rent as they couldn’t work.

it makes me think of me, with my nearly 10,000 likes on here, all my free media, and never capitalising from it and putting myself first. And now I have to, with tripled rent, and now I have to think about people saying “Cherry isn’t worth 16p a day”.

Ugh, sex work is not a place for overthinkers! We will have to agree to disagree on this one x

 

[JaLoBro]

4.99 for a whole month is actual pennies. 16 pennies a day. Giving pennies to a content creator you admire, then saying they aren’t even worth those pennies? It’s just wild and unnecessary rude.

it makes me think of the pandemic, with entertainers, drag queens, using the platform to try and make money for rent as they couldn’t work.

it makes me think of me, with my nearly 10,000 likes on here, all my free media, and never capitalising from it and putting myself first. And now I have to, with tripled rent, and now I have to think about people saying “Cherry isn’t worth 16p a day”.

Ugh, sex work is not a place for overthinkers! We will have to agree to disagree on this one x

You guys remind me of Siskel & Ebert arguing over their opposing movie reviews.
One person might dislike the movie Showgirls because of the bad acting. Another person
may like it because of the nudity and they found the bad acting hilarious.
It's just an opinion. Relax.

 

[cherryboom66]

You guys remind me of Siskel & Ebert arguing over their opposing movie reviews.
One person might dislike the movie Showgirls because of the bad acting. Another person
may like it because of the nudity and they found the bad acting hilarious.
It's just an opinion. Relax.
View attachment 108160761

Oohhh never heard of them before x

 

[captainX7]

Thats like saying you should be paying a $1 for a long movie trailer. You have enjoyed part of the movie right?

The excerpts are advertising to encourage you to the site to pay a subscription. Thats exactly why they use twitter - its their marketing machine.

They infer there is more to see and more available when in fact there isn't unless you then pay an exorbitant amount for a video in most cases.

The site itself will tell you there are 100 videos however does not allow you to see the length of them unless the creator allows that. Most don't because, as I said they 10 second excerpts and not what I want or paid for so you go in blind, assuming this creator you like is being fair about what they are doing.

The creators are fine believe me - they have learned that gay men can be dumbasses when it comes to porn and know how to milk it.

Hard agree with you! If you want me to sub for $4.99, then put in an equal (or greater) amount of effort to make the subscription worthwhile! More vids than pics with the vids being a decent length (5-10 mins) will usually do it for me.

 

[cherryboom66]

Hard agree with you! If you want me to sub for $4.99, then put in an equal (or greater) amount of effort to make the subscription worthwhile! More vids than pics with the vids being a decent length (5-10 mins) will usually do it for me.

Hiya! How much time will you be spending looking at the content? Will you be jerking off?

 

[captainX7]

Hiya! How much time will you be spending looking at the content? Will you be jerking off?

If it's hot enough. Since O.F. doesn't allow piss vids, I usually request a decent-length, regular shower vid, just plain, no jerking off necessary.

 

[cherryboom66]

If it's hot enough. Since O.F. doesn't allow piss vids, I usually request a decent-length, regular shower vid, just plain, no jerking off necessary.

So let me get this straight. You want lots of videos. All around 10 mins each. So, we are looking at hours of content… for 16p a day? You guys are absolutely WILD.

 

[dave in oz]

Hiya! How much time will you be spending looking at the content? Will you be jerking off?

If I join an Onlyfans I scroll through the video media looking at time lengths. I'll probably open a couple of short ones to have a look but how much do you get out of 20 seconds of a butt pose. Not much.

I can get a whole lot more than that on any of 100 free porn sites like boyfriendTV or pornhub.

You know that anything under 5 minutes is unlikely going to have a cumshot then I don't even bother, move on and wait to see how much their PPV will be.

I think a lot of guys feel similarly. Creators should be more like someone like David Christian (dombeeef) who posts a few good quality long collabs, has a decent back catalogue and charges a reasonable $12 or $13 per month.

Thats why he's making bank and others who skimp on content struggle. End users - creators should listen to them - wouldn't that be a weird world.

 

[dave in oz]

So let me get this straight. You want lots of videos. All around 10 mins each. So, we are looking at hours of content… for 16p a day? You guys are absolutely WILD.

No I'd pay a 12 month subscription worth $100 for that and just have.

you seem incapable of understanding there is massive amounts of free porn readily available and creators have to compete with that.

No matter what you want the real world to be, that is it.

For $5? I'd want maybe 10 decent length vids in a library with 2 new ones a month and would be happy if the price rose slowly over time.

You seem to think this is just an either or thing...its weird.

 

[dave in oz]

Hard agree with you! If you want me to sub for $4.99, then put in an equal (or greater) amount of effort to make the subscription worthwhile! More vids than pics with the vids being a decent length (5-10 mins) will usually do it for me.

Exactlly.

Cherrybomb seems to think we should happy to scoop up some crumbs off the floor and be grateful.

Thats why they never get ongoing subscribers - because they don't think about what the end user wants they think about the least they can provide to grab a few pennies. Short term thinking that means they'll fail in the end.

When you read stories frm ultra successful OF'er they invest an insane amount of time and effort into it to get themselves established and listen to feeback and ask what people want. Imagine - asking people who are willing to pay you money what they would like for that.

Revolutionary!

 

[dave in oz]

Getting back to the topic at hand... jimmy_only is hot and his page is free, BUT he charges up to $50 for a video that's barely 2 minutes long. Also, you can't message him unless you tip. Ridiculous.

He has probably found some wealthy subscribers who are happy throw money for custom vids at him so he doesn't have to try to hard.

Or he is over it and will only do it if he gets mega bucks.

 

[dave in oz]

4.99 for a whole month is actual pennies. 16 pennies a day. Giving pennies to a content creator you admire, then saying they aren’t even worth those pennies? It’s just wild and unnecessary rude.

it makes me think of the pandemic, with entertainers, drag queens, using the platform to try and make money for rent as they couldn’t work.

it makes me think of me, with my nearly 10,000 likes on here, all my free media, and never capitalising from it and putting myself first. And now I have to, with tripled rent, and now I have to think about people saying “Cherry isn’t worth 16p a day”.

Ugh, sex work is not a place for overthinkers! We will have to agree to disagree on this one x

4.99 for a whole month is actual pennies. 16 pennies a day. Giving pennies to a content creator you admire, then saying they aren’t even worth those pennies? It’s just wild and unnecessary rude.

it makes me think of the pandemic, with entertainers, drag queens, using the platform to try and make money for rent as they couldn’t work.

it makes me think of me, with my nearly 10,000 likes on here, all my free media, and never capitalising from it and putting myself first. And now I have to, with tripled rent, and now I have to think about people saying “Cherry isn’t worth 16p a day”.

Ugh, sex work is not a place for overthinkers! We will have to agree to disagree on this one x

OK this now makes more sense - you are taking this personally whereas we were talking objectively.

Look - here is a perfect example of someone starting out who has managed the correct price point while they grow their subscriber base. He charges $5.99 a month and in a year will probably be at $10 or $11.

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

Accept third party cookies

I think we are talking from 2 very different perspectives.

 

[dave in oz]

You guys remind me of Siskel & Ebert arguing over their opposing movie reviews.
One person might dislike the movie Showgirls because of the bad acting. Another person
may like it because of the nudity and they found the bad acting hilarious.
It's just an opinion. Relax.
View attachment 108160761

Excuse me but this is a life and death conversation - how dare you!

 

[cherryboom66]

OK this now makes more sense - you are taking this personally whereas we were talking objectively.

Look - here is a perfect example of someone starting out who has managed the correct price point while they grow their subscriber base. He charges $5.99 a month and in a year will probably be at $10 or $11.

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

Accept third party cookies

I think we are talking from 2 very different perspectives.

Yes, it’s hard to be objective when listening to what people expect for just 16p a day. I think people are forgetting how little 4.99 a month is, after the OF cut it’s actually more 3.50. If someone is charging 20 a month, sure, pop off. But 4.99? Madness x

 

[dave in oz]

Yes, it’s hard to be objective when listening to what people expect for just 16p a day. I think people are forgetting how little 4.99 a month is, after the OF cut it’s actually more 3.50. If someone is charging 20 a month, sure, pop off. But 4.99? Madness x

Charge $4.99, get 10 subscribers who come and go each month because they see nothing of any interest for that and leave.

Charge $5.99 like some do - or $6.99 and upwards to $10 and even $12 and provide killer content , get thousands and thousands of subscribers from positive word of mouth and reviews and suddenly that 16p a day becomes $50,000 a month because you focussed on growth and subscribers not bleating about 16p a day.

I am definitely subbing that OF because its a bargain and I will mention it to others. I doubt that OF'er sits there feeling sorry for himself when 1000's are coming through door. Think small and you'll stay small.

I can't think 0f another way to explain this basic business logic so if you don't get it I can't help you.