rl_26a
Legendary Member
- Joined
- Apr 14, 2019
- Posts
- 457
- Media
- 0
- Likes
- 1,639
- Points
- 213
- Location
- London (Greater London, England)
- Sexuality
- 100% Straight, 0% Gay
- Gender
- Female
Just talked to owen and said that his onlyfans is mostly going to be PPV, anddd I'm off.I decided to sub to his onlyfans—and I can already tell he's going to be baiting the fuck outta us (the subscribers)
The most he's shown was his ass while he was live (still looks good!) But that's about it. The rest are just underwear pics.
Don't subscribe for now—ill update when shit starts to get hot. But for now...no.
Just talked to owen and said that his onlyfans is mostly going to be PPV, anddd I'm off.
It means on top of paying the monthly subscription fee you also have to pay for all the content he posts. Just wait until he's hurting for money and has to come up with rent or bill money. He'll drop that whole everything is PPV thing real fastI never used OnlyFans, so what does that mean?
It means on top of paying the monthly subscription fee you also have to pay for all the content he posts. Just wait until he's hurting for money and has to come up with rent or bill money. He'll drop that whole everything is PPV thing real fast
Agree! Matter of time. Remember when he said he would NOT open an only fans? Haha I still remember him saying that he had a lot of money and he didn’t need OF. That he was a real model and bla bla bla. HahaIt means on top of paying the monthly subscription fee you also have to pay for all the content he posts. Just wait until he's hurting for money and has to come up with rent or bill money. He'll drop that whole everything is PPV thing real fast
Agree! Matter of time. Remember when he said he would NOT open an only fans? Haha I still remember him saying that he had a lot of money and he didn’t need OF. That he was a real model and bla bla bla. Haha
He’s dumb because actual trainers DO use OF for work out videos. Since he’s a “trainer,” he could have just made a few bucks actually helping people, but that prob requires too much work. Also, what is with ever gay porn star and being a “trainer”? Regularly working out doesn’t mean you’re capable of teaching people.If he had any real integrity, he would advertize his OF as just erotic nudes that don't show anything 'explicit' and not flip-flop between opinions when his financial situation becomes dour. Pretty sure that's why he made a new OF, so that he has a whole load of new people to clickbait into sending him money for what are essentially just work-out pictures...
He’s dumb because actual trainers DO use OF for work out videos. Since he’s a “trainer,” he could have just made a few bucks actually helping people, but that prob requires too much work. Also, what is with ever gay porn star and being a “trainer”? Regularly working out doesn’t mean you’re capable of teaching people.
Now people are just gonna talk more shit because he’s baiting.
really I thought it was gangsterGood
Lol he does look like a fucking toolG for GAY
From WC's FREE OF
SamePart of me says "What the fuck" and the other part says "God I wish I were Wyatt"
Sharing is caringI’ve seen the porn and I just subscribed I thought it would be better content. Definitely disappointed
OF should require it's performers to describe exactly what kind of content people will get when paying for pay per view. The way it's set up just enables performers to scam viewers out of their money. They bait them with hints and implications that they're paying for nudity but deliver disappointing, PG content. And of course, the viewer can't get a refund. So sleazy.Owen didn’t waste time with the scam collaborating with other Onlyfans con artists. He will post nothing but PG-13 bullshtt to subscribers who aren’t aware of his free nudes and porn already online.
View attachment 30262621
I've said this for like a year now since the conception of OF. I noticed a lot of these issues right away and its why I come here because I know 9/10 of the creators I subscribe to WILL use some kind of scam tactic. Its the "Well I can price it anyway I want to, I'm not going to let you see it for free" stuff they do. When in reality there is no inference on what content is sometimes and we pay for it in HOPES that its good. That is simply not a good business model.OF should require it's performers to describe exactly what kind of content people will get when paying for pay per view. The way it's set up just enables performers to scam viewers out of their money. They bait them with hints and implications that they're paying for nudity but deliver disappointing, PG content. And of course, the viewer can't get a refund. So sleazy.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.