Lol, it’s always the attractive ones that get the gay accusations. For some odd reason, you all never accuse Will Farrell or Flava Flav or Steve Buscemi of being a baguette.

The tea is why one thinks our SOfistIGATED gaydar can be strawmaned into a one-factor ruling like an individual's attractiveness...its an insult to presume we havent spent hours--days--carefully rumin-/masturb-ating this individual so hard into every fetish, position, backstory, and future ex-husband, child support providing scenario possible within our minds before making our careful and contemplated decision. You must know very little about us, brioche.

Theres plenty of evidence that a) not all 'unattractive' guys are free from the sus gayze, we just dont care to out them and b) many 'attractive ones' owe their very appeal not only to our quick action, word of mouth, and eye-locking talent-scouting abilities, but also c) many 'attractive' individuals use us as reference to their own hygene/fashion whilst sneaking glances and burying their noses deep in our rules/standards compiled with help from our own beards/hags/flies.

So you cant blame us for recognizing a good read/quick learner and calling that nancy out.
 
The tea is why one thinks our SOfistIGATED gaydar can be strawmaned into a one-factor ruling like an individual's attractiveness...its an insult to presume we havent spent hours--days--carefully rumin-/masturb-ating this individual so hard into every fetish, position, backstory, and future ex-husband, child support providing scenario possible within our minds before making our careful and contemplated decision. You must know very little about us, brioche.

Theres plenty of evidence that a) not all 'unattractive' guys are free from the sus gayze, we just dont care to out them and b) many 'attractive ones' owe their very appeal not only to our quick action, word of mouth, and eye-locking talent-scouting abilities, but also c) many 'attractive' individuals use us as reference to their own hygene/fashion whilst sneaking glances and burying their noses deep in our rules/standards compiled with help from our own beards/hags/flies.

So you cant blame us for recognizing a good read/quick learner and calling that nancy out.
Ma'am, you're (illiterately and incoherently) responding to something I said months ago. My point still stands. Argue with the wall.
 
Ma'am, you're (illiterately and incoherently) responding to something I said months ago. My point still stands. Argue with the wall.
you sure do be that lone voice whether months ago or again Sunday in another thread or numerous arguing that very same thing, that "without a doubt [Enter a Content Creator you follow] is 100% straight." pretty sus sis