Saxon Dunworth

Status
Not open for further replies.
  • Like
Reactions: Alikatvo
The boy has gone ‘blond’. Just my opinion but I find it a trashy look. What do others think?
I generally shy away from commenting on people’s physique, and I rebuked someone for calling him ‘too thin’ - given the fact that most people could do with losing 20 lbs of fat, or so - but even I have to admit that he seems to have gone too far in losing fat. My estimate is that his body fat percentage is *just* above the bare minimum (i.e. 7% or lower)
With the cropped, bleached hair, it makes him look gaunt and unhealthy.

On a side note: why do you keep calling him - a grown man - a ‘boy’ every time? Is that an expression used in your native language? Because in English, it comes across as disparaging and condescending, especially when done repetitively. Unless that is your intention, of course.
 
why do you keep calling him… a ‘boy’
Yes “Chico”= Boy. I don’t use it to be “disparaging”. IMO it’s an accurate description of him.

You say he’s “a grown man” but he does not behave like an adult. He has no regular job or profession. He’s not studying for a high-level qualification. He lives with his parents. And he likes to go to the gym.

My estimate is that his body fat percentage is *just* above the bare minimum (i.e. 7% or lower)
I don’t know his percentage of body fat - nor what the minimum is - but I have dated 2 different male models whose body fat was measured at 4%
 
  • Like
Reactions: Avocadopeach
Yes “Chico”= Boy. I don’t use it to be “disparaging”. IMO it’s an accurate description of him.

You say he’s “a grown man” but he does not behave like an adult. He has no regular job or profession. He’s not studying for a high-level qualification. He lives with his parents. And he likes to go to the gym.
You contradict yourself - probably don’t quite get the meaning of ‘to disparage’. You call him ‘boy’ to express your disdain, to express that he does not meet certain standards you hold, to show that you consider him inferior.
(I actually surmised as much, based on your other content)

I don’t know his percentage of body fat - nor what the minimum is - but I have dated 2 different male models whose body fat was measured at 4%
If their body fat was accurately measured (ie not by inference from measurements but either by DXA, MRI or MF-BIA), then they were at what is considered a physiological minimum, which cannot be maintained for more than a few weeks without dire consequences. At these levels, their hormone levels plummet: all image, no action.
Or in short: Unless they were a very specific type of model, I find it highly questionable.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Gaygeek1989
No contradiction. Clearly you do not like others to disagree with you. I feel you are a troll. I will not engage with you further.

I use ‘boy’ in a friendly sense. Also it’s a useful suffix as in ‘muscleboy’. And I have no disdain for Saxon. (Perhaps you would be happy to describe him as a ‘kidult’ but I consider that term disparaging.)

And FYI in LA some male models do get down to 4% body fat for photo shoots. I never said it’s healthy but in competing for work, they do it because rivals do.

Anyway back to the purpose of this thread, here are 3 more pics of our boy from his shoot in Malibu.
IMG_0376.jpeg
IMG_0377.jpeg

IMG_0378.jpeg
 
Status
Not open for further replies.