Sean Cody Deleted Videos

[blueanon994]

It might have been known but wasn't an issue until the New York Times ran their story on Pornhub and Mindgeek and the issues with certain videos.
Then it became one and led to the mass deletion we've seen.

Odds are we'll never know the full story.

 

[deleted70420]

Just found this old video. Apparently one of the models is Dylan. Anyone know which one is Dylan and who the other two are?

View attachment 69526271

Oh, nice. It's always great to see Dylan - I've been crushing on him since his original vids on Cody. His brother was so cute as well.

 

[Cbus Vers guy]

I still wish Sean himself had fucked one of the guys properly even just for one scene, ie naked, not just like that one time where the model rode him briefly while fully dressed and in close up only. I just think it would have been interesting to see lol.

I’d love to see what Sean himself even looks like

 

[Ninja108]

Oh, nice. It's always great to see Dylan - I've been crushing on him since his original vids on Cody. His brother was so cute as well.

Yup.
Shame his brother never did anything but I think he was just doing it for $$$.
Dylan I believe was truly curious/bi.

 

[sadboynthn]

Yes thats the pedo. No amount of professional studio photos will make a creep attractive though lol.

I never was a huge fan of his but I did like Noel and this makes their scene together all the more uncomfortable bc Noel was still a HS student at that point (or maybe he had just graduated?)

 

[maxxxs]

I’d love to see what Sean himself even looks like

Sean is in the video above my post that you quoted. He appeared in several of the early videos giving massages and oral to the models.

 

[Wendover]

Sean is in the video above my post that you quoted. He appeared in several of the early videos giving massages and oral to the models.

Yes, Sean was orally inclined, well at least on camera. But, who knows what kind of shenanigans went on behind the scenes. I just bet, that Sean loved topping that hot straight guy virgin hole.

 

[Ninja108]

Yes, Sean was orally inclined, well at least on camera. But, who knows what kind of shenanigans went on behind the scenes. I just bet, that Sean loved topping that hot straight guy virgin hole.

You know he and Zack hooked up off camera.

 

[Himbo310]

Yes, Sean was orally inclined, well at least on camera. But, who knows what kind of shenanigans went on behind the scenes. I just bet, that Sean loved topping that hot straight guy virgin hole.

He has fucked a model! It was with nick. I think it’s in the thread somewhere but a google search should be easy enough.

 

[Jimmy66]

@AppleSauceGlasses
#113 Blowing Marc

View attachment 69693721

Nice piece of toilet paper in his crack!

 

[jeduxo]

Anyone have Niko's solo scene? Released around 2010-2011.

 

[Seffher]

Right, it ChaosMen and not CF. He didn't shave his chest on Chaos, which I love

Vance serviced
https://www.gayforit.eu/video/940359/ChaosMen

 

[tarheel6]

His terrible record keeping has created a liability nightmare for them and forced them to flush half their catalog down the toilet. Surely there'd be some litigation as a remedy to this. Unless, perhaps this issue was disclosed at the time of the sale, but never made public. That's actually kind of plausible.

BS. It was Mindgeek's record-keeping failures (utter sloppiness) with pornhub that caused tons of problems, and it was after that, when credit card banks refused to process payments for subcriptions to MG sites, that they "temporarily” purged older stuff from the SC site.

When a company (MindGeek) has a deal negotiated to buy another company (SC), it's given access to all records of the company being bought. If there was a problem with SC's records, they should have found it during their "due diligence”. More likely, the SC archive purge was a stunt/shortcut to appease the credit card cos., and MG didn't want to invest time or money into doing anything to restore older scenes believing that its formula of pushing out poorer quality stuff at a rapid pace would drive more subscriptions.

 

[MrKit84]

BS. It was Mindgeek's record-keeping failures (utter sloppiness) with pornhub that caused tons of problems, and it was after that, when credit card banks refused to process payments for subcriptions to MG sites, that they "temporarily” purged older stuff from the SC site.

When a company (MindGeek) has a deal negotiated to buy another company (SC), it's given access to all records of the company being bought. If there was a problem with SC's records, they should have found it during their "due diligence”. More likely, the SC archive purge was a stunt/shortcut to appease the credit card cos., and MG didn't want to invest time or money into doing anything to restore older scenes believing that its formula of pushing out poorer quality stuff at a rapid pace would drive more subscriptions.

It's not that simple. MG owns pornhub and allowed all kinds of content of revenge porn, rape, sex abuse etc to be upoaded and never removed the harmful material. It wasn't because of Sean's papers it was because MG didn't care about policing PH.

 

[tarheel6]

It's not that simple. MG owns pornhub and allowed all kinds of content of revenge porn, rape, sex abuse etc to be upoaded and never removed the harmful material. It wasn't because of Sean's papers it was because MG didn't care about policing PH.

My point was MG's own sites either didn't keep adequate records or didn't know what content it could publish, and that credit card cos. stopped processing payments to their sites. Then MG made a purge of the SC catalog to make a show of compliance, announced it was temporary, but didn't do any review or work because it was cheaper to not and their business model is to churn out crap quickly.

 

[Zanefan]

They probably also knew the entire archive lives on in other ways. It's easy as hell to get any of their old scenes these days.

 

[sadboynthn]

If mindgeek is so terrible at record keeping, isn’t it just as possible that they noticed the same issue during the SC purchase and didn’t think it would be a problem?

 

[Crushed Coconut]

BS. It was Mindgeek's record-keeping failures (utter sloppiness) with pornhub that caused tons of problems, and it was after that, when credit card banks refused to process payments for subcriptions to MG sites, that they "temporarily” purged older stuff from the SC site.

When a company (MindGeek) has a deal negotiated to buy another company (SC), it's given access to all records of the company being bought. If there was a problem with SC's records, they should have found it during their "due diligence”. More likely, the SC archive purge was a stunt/shortcut to appease the credit card cos., and MG didn't want to invest time or money into doing anything to restore older scenes believing that its formula of pushing out poorer quality stuff at a rapid pace would drive more subscriptions.

His terrible record keeping has created a liability nightmare for them and forced them to flush half their catalog down the toilet. Surely there'd be some litigation as a remedy to this. Unless, perhaps this issue was disclosed at the time of the sale, but never made public. That's actually kind of plausible.

Actually -- you're both wrong.

One needs to look no further than those pop-up videos during the beginning of the pandemic that were trotted out as "new updates". The answer lies there. In case anyone isn't familiar with these, these were old updates with pop-up tidbits of information inserted into the scenes (reminiscent of Vh1's Pop-up videos during the mid 90's).

During late 2020, the purge happened. And some or all of the original videos of these scenes were removed, while the pop-up videos remained. So the theory that the recordkeeping isn't there doesn't really make sense. In each case, IT'S THE SAME SCENE! So if they don't have proof of the models age for the original scene, they don't have it for the pop-up video and almost certainly would have removed both, not kept one and deleted the other.

My best guess is that MG kept the pop-up videos because it was "their work". The original scenes weren't and so they removed them. We're pretty much rapidly reaching the point where all traces of the original SC have been removed and the Men-ification of SC has completely taken over, if we're not there already.

 

[Ninja108]

It's not that simple. MG owns pornhub and allowed all kinds of content of revenge porn, rape, sex abuse etc to be upoaded and never removed the harmful material. It wasn't because of Sean's papers it was because MG didn't care about policing PH.

Yup.
To be fair, they weren't as horrible as the NY Times article made them out to be but they DID blow off valid complaints so their hands aren't clean by any means in this whole mess.
As you said, there were likely issues with SC that MG didn't care about but when the shit hit the fan, it gave them a reason to purge all of the old scenes while keeping theirs.

 

[Jac711]

Why

Actually -- you're both wrong.

One needs to look no further than those pop-up videos during the beginning of the pandemic that were trotted out as "new updates". The answer lies there. In case anyone isn't familiar with these, these were old updates with pop-up tidbits of information inserted into the scenes (reminiscent of Vh1's Pop-up videos during the mid 90's).

During late 2020, the purge happened. And some or all of the original videos of these scenes were removed, while the pop-up videos remained. So the theory that the recordkeeping isn't there doesn't really make sense. In each case, IT'S THE SAME SCENE! So if they don't have proof of the models age for the original scene, they don't have it for the pop-up video and almost certainly would have removed both, not kept one and deleted the other.

My best guess is that MG kept the pop-up videos because it was "their work". The original scenes weren't and so they removed them. We're pretty much rapidly reaching the point where all traces of the original SC have been removed and the Men-ification of SC has completely taken over, if we're not there already.

I don’t understand why half of a models catalog can stay up.