Testicle Comparison Series

[dfwcumslut]

how 'bout a uniball?

https://imgur.com/ayO9kkc

Fat cock and low hanging uniball? Hot man.

 

[Hardybob]

View media item 10578731

 

[DavidAlmeria]

View media item 10578731

Fantastic dick and big balls

 

[allmanbud]

View media item 10578731

BEAUTIFUL!!!!!
Let ME do that for you bud!!!

 

[madraglic]

View attachment 91520371Thank you all for contributing, I always appreciate it. If I haven’t included your pic, please don’t be offended. I’m trying to do a degree of standardisation and it may be that it isn’t in quite the same format as the others. Also, no one should be too critical of the order. It’s open to interpretation and all a bit of fun.

I’ve obviously had to change the format. I am still accepting submission….probably until I stop receiving them.

There is something so horny about this, and I love seeing by balls among all the others. It's getting me rock hard right now. Thanks for doing this man!

 

[yomero]

Fascinating.... and yes, hot. Putting my own balls in the ring.

I wonder if we could use this spectrum of ballsacks to identify the ranges of what are XS, S, M, L, XL (and XXL?) balls. I suspect the sample is biased towards self-selected big to huge balls, but it can still be of educational use.

 

[yomero]

A testicular quarter test?

I decided to post this here instead of creating a new thread to gauge interest among those who have already been willing to take photos with coins on their ballsacks. I have very little experience with testicles other than my own, so anyone who is a testicle connoisseur or professional urologist is definitely invited to weigh in.

This thread does a fantastic job of showing the variation in testicle and scrotal shape and size and showing just how gigantic human testicles can actually be! It is a fantastic resource, and I don't think there are any groups of comparative testicle images like the ones has put together on the internet. Kudos to @onenight ! But I think that a reference for size ranges is missing.

I have a massive amount of respect for the statistical and creative work that people at CalcSD and Unraveling Size have done in terms of demystifying average penis size, especially since the internet is filled with penises that are in the top 0.1 percent of human variation. I am also a fan (and participant) in the quarter-test for penis size (for which there are multiple threads in LPSG), since it encourages people to "measure" their penis without actually revealing where the line stands on a ruler.

This is my humble attempt to contribute and hopefully getting a constructive conversation rolling. I am not going to extensively cite or footnote sources at this point, but a quick google search shows a consensus that the "normal" range for adult human testicles 4-5cm (length) x 2-2.5cm (width) x 3cm (depth). This corresponds to the 15-25ml range expected by physicians using a Prader orchidometer.

The visualization

I have used the Orchidometer app, which creates ovals with adjustables length and depth to calculate testicle volume, using the widely accepted Lambeth formula. (If you are testicle curious, trying it out this app can be a lot of fun.) This form of self-measurement is obviously not as reliable as a testicular examination or an ultrasound, but is a useful reference and easily accessible to anyone with a mobile phone. I then used the 2D images to create proportional 3D approximations using plasticine, with different reference values, going from 12ml to 75ml. I then photographed these next to each other with 1 to 3 quarter-size coins along the length of one of the testicles, depending on size. (I had to use €0.50 coins and Philippine pesos from my last holiday.)

The orchidometer app gives the option of 2 different data sets to estimate where the volume of a testicle falls on the normal distribution. I chose the standard from Tomova et al. (2010) to label the plasticine models in the image (based on the right testicle values). This sets the mean testicular volume at 17ml, which is consistent with the proposed "normal" range of a 4–5cm length. The alternative dataset, Goede et al. (2011), has a mean of 25ml, which with Tomova would be a "high medium."

Suggested size ranges

• Medium: I suggest that if you can comfortably sit 1quarter on a your largest testicle (the right being statistically larger) with some length to spare, it fits squarely in the 17ml (as shown in the image). I would put @TTskyRD and @frenchboy74 as examples of this mean and squarely in the medium category.
• Low medium: Anything between that and the fit of 1 quarter on the 12ml ovoids in the image (which take up the center rather than a single ball) would be low medium. I think @Korindie and perhaps even @DavidAlmeria are here, and not small (nor XS).
• High medium to large: If you can comfortably place 2 quarters on a single testicle, with some length to spare (so larger than the 25ml ovoids in the image), that would cross from the "high medium" to "large" territory. It is difficult to tell with some of the images in the "ball collage," but @madraglic is definitely in this territory with his bigger ball. Even with the the less generous Goede dataset, a 30ml testicle would still be bigger than those of about 75% of men, which I think would still qualify as large.
• Large to XL: The range between 2 and 3 quarters on a single testicle would encompass large to extra large. The appreciation between these two sizes would be clearer with more 2-3 quarters for scale, rather than just one.
• XL: Not sure if its the most accurate or fair standard, but if you can place and balance a 3rd quarter on one ball successfully enough to take a photo, I say they are definitely extra large!
• XXL: Once one can comfortably align 3 quarters on a testicle, that would be the extra-extra large range. Hard to gauge since some of the giant testicles are rounder and less ovoid, but @markg2000 and @red7.5 look like they could definitely line up 3 quarters on those giants. The 75ml model in the image is actually the largest size possible on the Orchidometer app! (Would have created a second giant testicle for a better comparison, but I ran out of plasticine. My apologies.)

Thoughts...?

 

[yomero]

I thought I would post my own quarter test as a sample, especially because putting more than one coin on a tightened scrotum turns out not to be that easy, since unlike my plasticine models, they are not a level surface. The desired level of scrotal tightness would appear to also introduce some variation.

It seems self-serving that I conveniently proposed a test which my own balls happen to just "pass" from the high medium to large category. I discovered this thread because I recently began questioning my long held assumption that my balls were naturally small to low-average because I am short, thin and not very muscular or hairy man, even if my penis is not small or average. I clearly do not have giant balls either, but I am genuinely curious as to where I really stand. And I think others may be too.

Here are some variations of my 1-euro (on each ball) and a pic of the package that is not a close up for a more relaxed, real-life view.

 

[Ranxerox]

I never knew... maybe big balls makes me look thin dicked?

Roxx.

 

[yomero]

@Ranxerox: Impressive XXL balls to go with an XXL monster dick. I wasn't expecting anyone to engage so quickly with this hypothetical test.

 

[littleguyhugecock]

Mine are the be size of jumbo chicken eggs

 

[madraglic]

A testicular quarter test?

I decided to post this here instead of creating a new thread to gauge interest among those who have already been willing to take photos with coins on their ballsacks. I have very little experience with testicles other than my own, so anyone who is a testicle connoisseur or professional urologist is definitely invited to weigh in.

This thread does a fantastic job of showing the variation in testicle and scrotal shape and size and showing just how gigantic human testicles can actually be! It is a fantastic resource, and I don't think there are any groups of comparative testicle images like the ones has put together on the internet. Kudos to @onenight ! But I think that a reference for size ranges is missing.

I have a massive amount of respect for the statistical and creative work that people at CalcSD and Unraveling Size have done in terms of demystifying average penis size, especially since the internet is filled with penises that are in the top 0.1 percent of human variation. I am also a fan (and participant) in the quarter-test for penis size (for which there are multiple threads in LPSG), since it encourages people to "measure" their penis without actually revealing where the line stands on a ruler.

This is my humble attempt to contribute and hopefully getting a constructive conversation rolling. I am not going to extensively cite or footnote sources at this point, but a quick google search shows a consensus that the "normal" range for adult human testicles 4-5cm (length) x 2-2.5cm (width) x 3cm (depth). This corresponds to the 15-25ml range expected by physicians using a Prader orchidometer.

The visualization

I have used the Orchidometer app, which creates ovals with adjustables length and depth to calculate testicle volume, using the widely accepted Lambeth formula. (If you are testicle curious, trying it out this app can be a lot of fun.) This form of self-measurement is obviously not as reliable as a testicular examination or an ultrasound, but is a useful reference and easily accessible to anyone with a mobile phone. I then used the 2D images to create proportional 3D approximations using plasticine, with different reference values, going from 12ml to 75ml. I then photographed these next to each other with 1 to 3 quarter-size coins along the length of one of the testicles, depending on size. (I had to use €0.50 coins and Philippine pesos from my last holiday.)

The orchidometer app gives the option of 2 different data sets to estimate where the volume of a testicle falls on the normal distribution. I chose the standard from Tomova et al. (2010) to label the plasticine models in the image (based on the right testicle values). This sets the mean testicular volume at 17ml, which is consistent with the proposed "normal" range of a 4–5cm length. The alternative dataset, Goede et al. (2011), has a mean of 25ml, which with Tomova would be a "high medium."

Suggested size ranges

• Medium: I suggest that if you can comfortably sit 1quarter on a your largest testicle (the right being statistically larger) with some length to spare, it fits squarely in the 17ml (as shown in the image). I would put @TTskyRD and @frenchboy74 as examples of this mean and squarely in the medium category.
• Low medium: Anything between that and the fit of 1 quarter on the 12ml ovoids in the image (which take up the center rather than a single ball) would be low medium. I think @Korindie and perhaps even @DavidAlmeria are here, and not small (nor XS).
• High medium to large: If you can comfortably place 2 quarters on a single testicle, with some length to spare (so larger than the 25ml ovoids in the image), that would cross from the "high medium" to "large" territory. It is difficult to tell with some of the images in the "ball collage," but @madraglic is definitely in this territory with his bigger ball. Even with the the less generous Goede dataset, a 30ml testicle would still be bigger than those of about 75% of men, which I think would still qualify as large.
• Large to XL: The range between 2 and 3 quarters on a single testicle would encompass large to extra large. The appreciation between these two sizes would be clearer with more 2-3 quarters for scale, rather than just one.
• XL: Not sure if its the most accurate or fair standard, but if you can place and balance a 3rd quarter on one ball successfully enough to take a photo, I say they are definitely extra large!
• XXL: Once one can comfortably align 3 quarters on a testicle, that would be the extra-extra large range. Hard to gauge since some of the giant testicles are rounder and less ovoid, but @markg2000 and @red7.5 look like they could definitely line up 3 quarters on those giants. The 75ml model in the image is actually the largest size possible on the Orchidometer app! (Would have created a second giant testicle for a better comparison, but I ran out of plasticine. My apologies.)

Thoughts...?

View attachment 95466751

Great work! This is really interesting and I'm definitely interested in taking part in any future comparison work!

 

[frenchboy74]

A testicular quarter test?

I decided to post this here instead of creating a new thread to gauge interest among those who have already been willing to take photos with coins on their ballsacks. I have very little experience with testicles other than my own, so anyone who is a testicle connoisseur or professional urologist is definitely invited to weigh in.

This thread does a fantastic job of showing the variation in testicle and scrotal shape and size and showing just how gigantic human testicles can actually be! It is a fantastic resource, and I don't think there are any groups of comparative testicle images like the ones has put together on the internet. Kudos to @onenight ! But I think that a reference for size ranges is missing.

I have a massive amount of respect for the statistical and creative work that people at CalcSD and Unraveling Size have done in terms of demystifying average penis size, especially since the internet is filled with penises that are in the top 0.1 percent of human variation. I am also a fan (and participant) in the quarter-test for penis size (for which there are multiple threads in LPSG), since it encourages people to "measure" their penis without actually revealing where the line stands on a ruler.

This is my humble attempt to contribute and hopefully getting a constructive conversation rolling. I am not going to extensively cite or footnote sources at this point, but a quick google search shows a consensus that the "normal" range for adult human testicles 4-5cm (length) x 2-2.5cm (width) x 3cm (depth). This corresponds to the 15-25ml range expected by physicians using a Prader orchidometer.

The visualization

I have used the Orchidometer app, which creates ovals with adjustables length and depth to calculate testicle volume, using the widely accepted Lambeth formula. (If you are testicle curious, trying it out this app can be a lot of fun.) This form of self-measurement is obviously not as reliable as a testicular examination or an ultrasound, but is a useful reference and easily accessible to anyone with a mobile phone. I then used the 2D images to create proportional 3D approximations using plasticine, with different reference values, going from 12ml to 75ml. I then photographed these next to each other with 1 to 3 quarter-size coins along the length of one of the testicles, depending on size. (I had to use €0.50 coins and Philippine pesos from my last holiday.)

The orchidometer app gives the option of 2 different data sets to estimate where the volume of a testicle falls on the normal distribution. I chose the standard from Tomova et al. (2010) to label the plasticine models in the image (based on the right testicle values). This sets the mean testicular volume at 17ml, which is consistent with the proposed "normal" range of a 4–5cm length. The alternative dataset, Goede et al. (2011), has a mean of 25ml, which with Tomova would be a "high medium."

Suggested size ranges

• Medium: I suggest that if you can comfortably sit 1quarter on a your largest testicle (the right being statistically larger) with some length to spare, it fits squarely in the 17ml (as shown in the image). I would put @TTskyRD and @frenchboy74 as examples of this mean and squarely in the medium category.
• Low medium: Anything between that and the fit of 1 quarter on the 12ml ovoids in the image (which take up the center rather than a single ball) would be low medium. I think @Korindie and perhaps even @DavidAlmeria are here, and not small (nor XS).
• High medium to large: If you can comfortably place 2 quarters on a single testicle, with some length to spare (so larger than the 25ml ovoids in the image), that would cross from the "high medium" to "large" territory. It is difficult to tell with some of the images in the "ball collage," but @madraglic is definitely in this territory with his bigger ball. Even with the the less generous Goede dataset, a 30ml testicle would still be bigger than those of about 75% of men, which I think would still qualify as large.
• Large to XL: The range between 2 and 3 quarters on a single testicle would encompass large to extra large. The appreciation between these two sizes would be clearer with more 2-3 quarters for scale, rather than just one.
• XL: Not sure if its the most accurate or fair standard, but if you can place and balance a 3rd quarter on one ball successfully enough to take a photo, I say they are definitely extra large!
• XXL: Once one can comfortably align 3 quarters on a testicle, that would be the extra-extra large range. Hard to gauge since some of the giant testicles are rounder and less ovoid, but @markg2000 and @red7.5 look like they could definitely line up 3 quarters on those giants. The 75ml model in the image is actually the largest size possible on the Orchidometer app! (Would have created a second giant testicle for a better comparison, but I ran out of plasticine. My apologies.)

Thoughts...?

View attachment 95466751

I'd have thought i was way below average, like very small, but apparently it's just people here that are way above average

 

[Korindie]

A testicular quarter test?

I decided to post this here instead of creating a new thread to gauge interest among those who have already been willing to take photos with coins on their ballsacks. I have very little experience with testicles other than my own, so anyone who is a testicle connoisseur or professional urologist is definitely invited to weigh in.

This thread does a fantastic job of showing the variation in testicle and scrotal shape and size and showing just how gigantic human testicles can actually be! It is a fantastic resource, and I don't think there are any groups of comparative testicle images like the ones has put together on the internet. Kudos to @onenight ! But I think that a reference for size ranges is missing.

I have a massive amount of respect for the statistical and creative work that people at CalcSD and Unraveling Size have done in terms of demystifying average penis size, especially since the internet is filled with penises that are in the top 0.1 percent of human variation. I am also a fan (and participant) in the quarter-test for penis size (for which there are multiple threads in LPSG), since it encourages people to "measure" their penis without actually revealing where the line stands on a ruler.

This is my humble attempt to contribute and hopefully getting a constructive conversation rolling. I am not going to extensively cite or footnote sources at this point, but a quick google search shows a consensus that the "normal" range for adult human testicles 4-5cm (length) x 2-2.5cm (width) x 3cm (depth). This corresponds to the 15-25ml range expected by physicians using a Prader orchidometer.

The visualization

I have used the Orchidometer app, which creates ovals with adjustables length and depth to calculate testicle volume, using the widely accepted Lambeth formula. (If you are testicle curious, trying it out this app can be a lot of fun.) This form of self-measurement is obviously not as reliable as a testicular examination or an ultrasound, but is a useful reference and easily accessible to anyone with a mobile phone. I then used the 2D images to create proportional 3D approximations using plasticine, with different reference values, going from 12ml to 75ml. I then photographed these next to each other with 1 to 3 quarter-size coins along the length of one of the testicles, depending on size. (I had to use €0.50 coins and Philippine pesos from my last holiday.)

The orchidometer app gives the option of 2 different data sets to estimate where the volume of a testicle falls on the normal distribution. I chose the standard from Tomova et al. (2010) to label the plasticine models in the image (based on the right testicle values). This sets the mean testicular volume at 17ml, which is consistent with the proposed "normal" range of a 4–5cm length. The alternative dataset, Goede et al. (2011), has a mean of 25ml, which with Tomova would be a "high medium."

Suggested size ranges

• Medium: I suggest that if you can comfortably sit 1quarter on a your largest testicle (the right being statistically larger) with some length to spare, it fits squarely in the 17ml (as shown in the image). I would put @TTskyRD and @frenchboy74 as examples of this mean and squarely in the medium category.
• Low medium: Anything between that and the fit of 1 quarter on the 12ml ovoids in the image (which take up the center rather than a single ball) would be low medium. I think @Korindie and perhaps even @DavidAlmeria are here, and not small (nor XS).
• High medium to large: If you can comfortably place 2 quarters on a single testicle, with some length to spare (so larger than the 25ml ovoids in the image), that would cross from the "high medium" to "large" territory. It is difficult to tell with some of the images in the "ball collage," but @madraglic is definitely in this territory with his bigger ball. Even with the the less generous Goede dataset, a 30ml testicle would still be bigger than those of about 75% of men, which I think would still qualify as large.
• Large to XL: The range between 2 and 3 quarters on a single testicle would encompass large to extra large. The appreciation between these two sizes would be clearer with more 2-3 quarters for scale, rather than just one.
• XL: Not sure if its the most accurate or fair standard, but if you can place and balance a 3rd quarter on one ball successfully enough to take a photo, I say they are definitely extra large!
• XXL: Once one can comfortably align 3 quarters on a testicle, that would be the extra-extra large range. Hard to gauge since some of the giant testicles are rounder and less ovoid, but @markg2000 and @red7.5 look like they could definitely line up 3 quarters on those giants. The 75ml model in the image is actually the largest size possible on the Orchidometer app! (Would have created a second giant testicle for a better comparison, but I ran out of plasticine. My apologies.)

Thoughts...?

View attachment 95466751

Interesting. I’m not sure what exactly constitutes as “large” “medium” “small” etc etc. But looking it up online it shows that 1-3ml is childhood, 4-6ml is early puberty, 7–12ml is mid puberty, 13-15ml is late puberty and 16-25ml is adulthood.

 

[allmanbud]

How about just measuring AROUND BOTH balls?
That seems to be the simplest way of measuring ball size to me !!!!!!

 

[DavidAlmeria]

A testicular quarter test?

I decided to post this here instead of creating a new thread to gauge interest among those who have already been willing to take photos with coins on their ballsacks. I have very little experience with testicles other than my own, so anyone who is a testicle connoisseur or professional urologist is definitely invited to weigh in.

This thread does a fantastic job of showing the variation in testicle and scrotal shape and size and showing just how gigantic human testicles can actually be! It is a fantastic resource, and I don't think there are any groups of comparative testicle images like the ones has put together on the internet. Kudos to @onenight ! But I think that a reference for size ranges is missing.

I have a massive amount of respect for the statistical and creative work that people at CalcSD and Unraveling Size have done in terms of demystifying average penis size, especially since the internet is filled with penises that are in the top 0.1 percent of human variation. I am also a fan (and participant) in the quarter-test for penis size (for which there are multiple threads in LPSG), since it encourages people to "measure" their penis without actually revealing where the line stands on a ruler.

This is my humble attempt to contribute and hopefully getting a constructive conversation rolling. I am not going to extensively cite or footnote sources at this point, but a quick google search shows a consensus that the "normal" range for adult human testicles 4-5cm (length) x 2-2.5cm (width) x 3cm (depth). This corresponds to the 15-25ml range expected by physicians using a Prader orchidometer.

The visualization

I have used the Orchidometer app, which creates ovals with adjustables length and depth to calculate testicle volume, using the widely accepted Lambeth formula. (If you are testicle curious, trying it out this app can be a lot of fun.) This form of self-measurement is obviously not as reliable as a testicular examination or an ultrasound, but is a useful reference and easily accessible to anyone with a mobile phone. I then used the 2D images to create proportional 3D approximations using plasticine, with different reference values, going from 12ml to 75ml. I then photographed these next to each other with 1 to 3 quarter-size coins along the length of one of the testicles, depending on size. (I had to use €0.50 coins and Philippine pesos from my last holiday.)

The orchidometer app gives the option of 2 different data sets to estimate where the volume of a testicle falls on the normal distribution. I chose the standard from Tomova et al. (2010) to label the plasticine models in the image (based on the right testicle values). This sets the mean testicular volume at 17ml, which is consistent with the proposed "normal" range of a 4–5cm length. The alternative dataset, Goede et al. (2011), has a mean of 25ml, which with Tomova would be a "high medium."

Suggested size ranges

• Medium: I suggest that if you can comfortably sit 1quarter on a your largest testicle (the right being statistically larger) with some length to spare, it fits squarely in the 17ml (as shown in the image). I would put @TTskyRD and @frenchboy74 as examples of this mean and squarely in the medium category.
• Low medium: Anything between that and the fit of 1 quarter on the 12ml ovoids in the image (which take up the center rather than a single ball) would be low medium. I think @Korindie and perhaps even @DavidAlmeria are here, and not small (nor XS).
• High medium to large: If you can comfortably place 2 quarters on a single testicle, with some length to spare (so larger than the 25ml ovoids in the image), that would cross from the "high medium" to "large" territory. It is difficult to tell with some of the images in the "ball collage," but @madraglic is definitely in this territory with his bigger ball. Even with the the less generous Goede dataset, a 30ml testicle would still be bigger than those of about 75% of men, which I think would still qualify as large.
• Large to XL: The range between 2 and 3 quarters on a single testicle would encompass large to extra large. The appreciation between these two sizes would be clearer with more 2-3 quarters for scale, rather than just one.
• XL: Not sure if its the most accurate or fair standard, but if you can place and balance a 3rd quarter on one ball successfully enough to take a photo, I say they are definitely extra large!
• XXL: Once one can comfortably align 3 quarters on a testicle, that would be the extra-extra large range. Hard to gauge since some of the giant testicles are rounder and less ovoid, but @markg2000 and @red7.5 look like they could definitely line up 3 quarters on those giants. The 75ml model in the image is actually the largest size possible on the Orchidometer app! (Would have created a second giant testicle for a better comparison, but I ran out of plasticine. My apologies.)

Thoughts...?

View attachment 95466751

Very interesting…Thank you

 

[yomero]

@Korindie : Thanks for bringing that up. These are indeed the normative (“ideal”) parameters developed by Tanner in the ‘70s, applying the beads of the recently invented Prader orchidometer. Their interest was in the onset of puberty and establishing clinical benchmarks of pubertal development of teenagers. Their interest was not a study of the variability or average size of adult testicles, and was based in their clinical observations of teenagers, not a systematic data, like what has been collected by scientists since then and built into the orchidometer app.

A quick search of medical data from google suggests that adult testicles less than 3.5cm in length are what qualify as small. According to the orchidometer app that would be a testicle smaller than the one shown below, the limit of “low medium” in my proposed scale.

 

[yomero]

I am retiring the small army of green plasticine testicles that were at one point strewn over my living room table. Their presence would have been very awkward to explain to a surprise visitor. But before that, I decided to take a final series of photographs comparing each of the model ovoids (17, 25 and 75ml) to my left and right testicles, for the sake of "scientific" inquiry and volunteering my own balls as a frame of reference for others. I don't in any way think ballsack influencer or testicle model is in the cards as a career change. These are included below and as part of a gallery which shows my own balls in different, settings, angles and levels of "scrotal relaxation" (I am not blessed with permanent low hangers). The gallery also includes the main visual showing the suggested ranges from S to XXL.

I love how this thread celebrates massive balls, and in fact, it celebrates balls of any size. But such a high concentration of images of gargantuan testicles is also bound to make the rest of us feel inadequate. And it shouldn't, as long as one's balls are getting the job done. The "educational" visuals I have put together are somewhat inspired by science but are meant primarily for entertainment and promoting body positivity. Not in any way a substitute for a medical opinion (a necessary disclaimer I had not yet added).

View media item 11944181
View media item 11944171
View media item 11944161
View album 1211021

 

[onenight]

Hi @yomero ! Thanks very much for your contributions to this thread. As someone who has a fascination with testicles, I actually already owned the orchidometer app and an actual physical orchidometer, so its great to see you use one here lol.

You're right, the reason I created this thread was as something of a celebration of manhood, of all sizes. I'm glad that it's generated some interest and thoughts.

The reason why I thought it would be good to use a quarter as a reference point was that it was easy and accessible. And interestingly enough, most countries actually have a coin of similar physical size.

i like your ideas but there are a few issues. Firstly I didn't want to use the orchidometer.app or an orchidometer as they are both somewhat esoteric and not everyone would have access to one. To be honest, I'd love to create a series which features an orchidometer, but I don't think that would be possible.

Just in regards to the size classifications you mentioned, the problem is that orchidometers don't break down sizes into S M and L. There is some history behind this. Orchidometers were orginally designed to gauge pubertal development. After about 15ml, adult development is considered "normal" and there wasn't much scienetific interest in gauging sizes greater than this. As a result, most orchidometers range max out at 25ml. This means that most studies that use orchidometers actually have an average probaly much less than the actual. Anyway, what this means is that it would be difficult to assign a S M or L rating to an orchidometer, beyond what the usual classification of childhood, early, mid, and late puberty and adulthood.

Interestingly enough, the orchidometer I own was designed to measure for size abnormalities in adults, so its maximum bead is a 35.

Average ranges for testicle size are also quite inaccurate. If you look at wikipedia for example, it says that average length in about 5cm which is actually quite large. Most guys would have something below this.

 

[DavidAlmeria]

My testicles were the the smallest on this survey. I have felt a lump that feels more like a vein . Seeing a urologist here in Spain next week. I’ll let you know what he says.