The $10,000 10-inch challenge

[TinyPrincess]

Just noticed a post mentioning how LPSG have reached 2 million members.

We also just passed 8 billion people on this tiny planet, so 1 in 2,000 men is actually a member.

(@Mr. LPSG, you should add a sticker to the site mentioning 1:2,000 men.)

So despite some members effort to belittle LPSG, it's actually quite well-known - it's hardly necessary with 6 degrees to reach all corners.

Anyways, on CalcSD 7.6" is the last length where 1:1.000 would be longer. If you enter 7.7" then nobody in a 1,000 would be longer.

Sure, one guy probably would if the sample base was 2,000. The longest guys here are close to 9" but then LPSG is probably heavily biased in regards to hung guys.

I just wonder if a sample base of 4,000,000,000 would actually be enough to produce a winner at CalcSD.

 

[hzs3fg]

Just noticed a post mentioning how LPSG have reached 2 million members.

We also just passed 8 billion people on this tiny planet, so 1 in 2,000 men is actually a member.

(@Mr. LPSG, you should add a sticker to the site mentioning 1:2,000 men.)

So despite some members effort to belittle LPSG, it's actually quite well-known - it's hardly necessary with 6 degrees to reach all corners.

Anyways, on CalcSD 7.6" is the last length where 1:1.000 would be longer. If you enter 7.7" then nobody in a 1,000 would be longer.

Sure, one guy probably would if the sample base was 2,000. The longest guys here are close to 9" but then LPSG is probably heavily biased in regards to hung guys.

I just wonder if a sample base of 4,000,000,000 would actually be enough to produce a winner at CalcSD.

You are being too kind.

Most of those purported to be 9" are highly suspect. I doubt that more than a few of them are legit.

 

[TinyPrincess]

You are being too kind.

Most of those purported to be 9" are highly suspect. I doubt that more than a few of them are legit.

Not necessarily disagreeing, just pointing out that the sample base here is very different than the one at CalcSD.

And as we can't even find an honest 9" here (sorry if I just put my foot in it), I just wondered if CalcSD would even compute a winner at a sample base of 4 billion.

 

[TinyPrincess]

Plus, I was actually impressed that 1 in 2,000 guys is a member worldwide.

If we look at the western world the number must be closer to 1:250 or probably even less.

Forget Twitter and Facebook, the next President will be elected via LPSG.

 

[ave21]

 

[like2Feelabig1]

View attachment 84581081

Oh ffs.......

there, you made me swear, shame on you.

 

[chesticles55]

View attachment 84581081

Well, not proper since not on top. Do you have an ID or source for it though? I’ve seen this before but don’t know who it is. Could be one of the biggest if unedited. Something looks a little off though.

 

[hzs3fg]

Well, not proper since not on top. Do you have an ID or source for it though? I’ve seen this before but don’t know who it is. Could be one of the biggest if unedited. Something looks a little off though.

To my eyes there is something very plastic-y about that penis.

Are we convinced that it real?

 

[chesticles55]

To my eyes there is something very plastic-y about that penis.

Are we convinced that it real?

No, I’m not at least. It’s pretty well done if fake. But it looks a little touched up and out of place. Sort of has that look to it that a lot of the more recent edits have. That could be completely wrong though and it’s real. Maybe someone else can ID it or weigh in.

 

[deleted15849871]

No, I’m not at least. It’s fairly well done if real, but it looks a little morphy and out of place. Sort of has that look to it that a lot of the more recent edits have. I could be wrong though and it’s real. Maybe someone else can ID it or weigh in.

Unless connected to a person holding a piece of paper saying lpsg on it like verification photos theres now way of knowing if its real fake or edited or one of those realistic sex toys with lifelike aesthetics. I'd assume if its 10k prize theres some sort of private verification too.

 

[chesticles55]

Unless connected to a person holding a piece of paper saying lpsg on it like verification photos theres now way of knowing if its real fake or edited or one of those realistic sex toys with lifelike aesthetics. I'd assume if its 10k prize theres some sort of private verification too.

I mean, technically even that wouldn’t necessarily make it real. It definitely isn’t a sex toy though. I’m decent at spotting fakes just from experience, but pretty bad with technology and computer stuff. Maybe someone who isn’t has a better idea about the authenticity.

 

[Shepardson]

Something looks a little off though.

Agreed. It also has that oh so common issue where they made the mistake of getting a hand in the shot with it, which looks like it would get 2/3 of the way up his shaft if he wrapped it around it (10+?), and a slice of skin that's out of place at the base of the balls, though that could be something else. Not really worth considering as legit IMHO.

 

[chesticles55]

Agreed. It also has that oh so common issue where they made the mistake of getting a hand in the shot with it, which looks like it would get 2/3 of the way up his shaft if he wrapped it around it (10+?), and a slice of skin that's out of place at the base of the balls, though that could be something else. Not really worth considering as legit IMHO.

Great eye. I didn’t notice at first but there’s a little sharp corner or “glitch” in the skin on the left side of the balls where it looks like it’s the edge of some cut and paste line or something. Didn’t notice that at first. I’m not really a fan of discrediting based off hand size because some dudes just have really big hands and it’s proven untrustworthy in some cases, but I think you are correct here. Again, if someone can prove it’s real I’ve got no issues.

 

[Shepardson]

I’m not really a fan of discrediting based off hand size because some dudes just have really big hands and it’s proven untrustworthy in some cases,

As someone who doesn't have the most dick-friendly hands, I hear you on that. I just figure in a case where the guy's trying to tell you the dick in the picture is over ten inches long and the hand has that sort of relationship to it, something's probably up.

 

[ave21]

You guys don't realy want to find the 10"er!
Photoshoped, ruler not on top, hand in the background and no LPSG paper in the photo....
Good luck
To fussy for me

 

[Khegan]

Great eye. I didn’t notice at first but there’s a little sharp corner or “glitch” in the skin on the left side of the balls where it looks like it’s the edge of some cut and paste line or something. Didn’t notice that at first. I’m not really a fan of discrediting based off hand size because some dudes just have really big hands and it’s proven untrustworthy in some cases, but I think you are correct here. Again, if someone can prove it’s real I’ve got no issues.

According to image edited, it is probably manipulated in some form, so I think all the observations are correct.

 

[Shepardson]

You guys don't realy want to find the 10"er!
Photoshoped, ruler not on top, hand in the background and no LPSG paper in the photo....
Good luck
To fussy for me

We simply call 'em as we see 'em. We've been watching this stuff for ages and it gets easier to know what to look for. If they're not standing up straight with a ruler on top and their dick sticking straight out from their body, they're just not the size they're claiming to be. They're not really rules we made up, just common measuring sense. And FWIW, they ALL know that stuff, it just doesn't give them the number they want you to see.

 

[chesticles55]

You guys don't realy want to find the 10"er!
Photoshoped, ruler not on top, hand in the background and no LPSG paper in the photo....
Good luck
To fussy for me

Yeah, because it’s very healthy and logical to just blindly believe everything and question nothing. I actually asked you for a source or identification and was/still am open to being proven wrong about it. Of course people are going to be “fussy” when there’s so much horse shit out there.

 

[hzs3fg]

According to image edited, it is probably manipulated in some form, so I think all the observations are correct.

I won't speak for the others, but I, personally, start from the perspective that 10" cocks do not exist and assume that any photograph purporting to show one is a fake. I think this is a very reasonable view.

If you've really got ten inches, you will present a preponderance of evidence that forces me to reconsider my position. Until you have done that, your photo is just another of the hundreds of faked or manipulated images that have been presented thus far.

 

[14600801]

Well "bone pressed" is what guys with little dicks on these penis enlargement sites started using. The same type of sites who claim jelqing will make your penis longer when urologist state there is zero change jelqing will make your penis bigger.

Do you know how you are suppose to measure your penis? You get a erection, get a hard tape measure. You stand up with your penis parallel to the floor, you measure your dick from the top, you don't jam the tape measure into your gut and talk about fat pads and bone pressed.

In either case you are cheating with your measurement. Measured properly you are probably 8 inches if that.

Bone pressed is, indeed, better for a comparative study. But it just make sense with honest measurements (so either if the measurement is done by whoever is doing a study on that or if you do it for yourself).

The reason why is obvious: the dick size of a person does not change, regardless of the person being thinner or fatter.