Ugh. I'm just waiting for the day when AI is used for political propaganda that causes real, major problems. This shit needs to be legislated before it gets out of control.The first one does say 99% AI in an AI detector that is usually reliable and it has some AI common issues. There's an extra loop in drawstrings for the shorts, the foliage is a bit too detailed for something that out of focus. Some of the shadows seem inconsistent (around the navel and the shadow of his right arm on his lower abs looks like the arm should be down and not bent). And the coffee sleeve doesn't appear to merge with his hand.
The second pic doesn't have many red flags, doesn't appear as AI generated in detector. But that camera placement is weird. Would a "candid" picture on set have a camera placed like that? Maybe but something isn't right. The shadows seem to fit. But his ears in both picture are somewhat different, mostly the tragus changes in both pictures.
And there is another picture to that set of pictures when you google them and his shorts are also different (no drawstrings at all), so is the coffee sleeve. If there are indeed AI, they are good and probably made from real pictures of him and not only word generated.