joepanikishot
Loved Member
- Joined
- Apr 15, 2020
- Posts
- 91
- Media
- 0
- Likes
- 610
- Points
- 93
- Location
- Oakland (California, United States)
- Sexuality
- 90% Gay, 10% Straight
- Gender
- Male
AI generated. Not real.
AI generated. Not real.
Do you guys truly believe Tom is going to be fully naked in that Odyssey movie and engaging in hardcore gay sex??? This is a Hollywood produced movie… remember what they did with Troy starring Brad Pitt… cut all the gay stuff and barely any nudity…
Explain your reasoning, please.AI generated. Not real.
My reasoning is those pictures have been widely debunked as AI.Explain your reasoning, please.
The first one does say 99% AI in an AI detector that is usually reliable and it has some AI common issues. There's an extra loop in drawstrings for the shorts, the foliage is a bit too detailed for something that out of focus. Some of the shadows seem inconsistent (around the navel and the shadow of his right arm on his lower abs looks like the arm should be down and not bent). And the coffee sleeve doesn't appear to merge with his hand.Explain your reasoning, please.
Thank you for taking the time to explain what I was too lazy to.The first one does say 99% AI in an AI detector that is usually reliable and it has some AI common issues. There's an extra loop in drawstrings for the shorts, the foliage is a bit too detailed for something that out of focus. Some of the shadows seem inconsistent (around the navel and the shadow of his right arm on his lower abs looks like the arm should be down and not bent). And the coffee sleeve doesn't appear to merge with his hand.
The second pic doesn't have many red flags, doesn't appear as AI generated in detector. But that camera placement is weird. Would a "candid" picture on set have a camera placed like that? Maybe but something isn't right. The shadows seem to fit. But his ears in both picture are somewhat different, mostly the tragus changes in both pictures.
And there is another picture to that set of pictures when you google them and his shorts are also different (no drawstrings at all), so is the coffee sleeve. If there are indeed AI, they are good and probably made from real pictures of him and not only word generated.
Like a Jeremy Allen white campaign? That would be hot.Still waiting for a Calvin’s shoot…how much money do we have to pitch in to get it
At the end of the day that's all that matters. Just do the story as intended. I don't want directors adding their fanfiction in tbh. Gay or otherwise.Although there's nothing explicit homoerotic in The Odissey,
Ugh. I'm just waiting for the day when AI is used for political propaganda that causes real, major problems. This shit needs to be legislated before it gets out of control.The first one does say 99% AI in an AI detector that is usually reliable and it has some AI common issues. There's an extra loop in drawstrings for the shorts, the foliage is a bit too detailed for something that out of focus. Some of the shadows seem inconsistent (around the navel and the shadow of his right arm on his lower abs looks like the arm should be down and not bent). And the coffee sleeve doesn't appear to merge with his hand.
The second pic doesn't have many red flags, doesn't appear as AI generated in detector. But that camera placement is weird. Would a "candid" picture on set have a camera placed like that? Maybe but something isn't right. The shadows seem to fit. But his ears in both picture are somewhat different, mostly the tragus changes in both pictures.
And there is another picture to that set of pictures when you google them and his shorts are also different (no drawstrings at all), so is the coffee sleeve. If there are indeed AI, they are good and probably made from real pictures of him and not only word generated.
It is damn near there already. Facebook has been infested with AI images. And what is sad is so many people believe the images are real.Ugh. I'm just waiting for the day when AI is used for political propaganda that causes real, major problems. This shit needs to be legislated before it gets out of control.
the odyssey doesn't even have that to cut. and Telemachus is one of the few ancient Greek charcters that has no male lovers to speak of
Actually there's Pisistratus, that becomes his close friend and they even "sleep together", whatever that meant to ancient greeks... He's a minor character and doesn't have a big role in the story so he's often overlooked. I'm really quite sure he'll NOT be in Nolan's version!
From wiki: "Pisistratus became an intimate friend of Telemachus, son of Odysseus, and travelled with him on his unsuccessful search for his father"
"Intimate friends" 100% means lovers.
reading the Original text it does not seem that way I am afraid none of the words one expects to be used (like some of the words uses with Achilles and patroclus) and remember up untill very recently men shared a bed as a gestured of trust. maybe the producer will do something but do not hold your breath"Intimate friends" 100% means lovers.