Winter Soldier
Superior Member
Runaways / Weglopers
He touches the other butt hole
Runaways / Weglopers
Yeah, and they show almost nothing there. They think we're stupid... Hard to find good directors nowadaysIt’s simulated. His package is clearly in some kind of modesty baggie.
look like a condom to me.It’s simulated. His package is clearly in some kind of modesty baggie.
If that is a dick, it ain’t hardNo baggie
That’s his ballsackIt’s simulated. His package is clearly in some kind of modesty baggie.
he‘s so hot!! Does anybody got some Information?Ok seriously. Who IS he? Skinny guys always coming through with the giant cocks.
There's some kind of plastic or fabric covering, I don't think that's a condom or the texture of his balls.No baggie
AI is our misfortune.There's some kind of plastic or fabric covering, I don't think that's a condom or the texture of his balls.
View attachment 137458671
View attachment 137458681
View attachment 137458691
Anyway, you can tell just from the way the whole thing is shot that it's simulated sex. The angles, when they cut away, the fact that every time there's full frontal nudity they are flaccid. That's what simulated sex scenes look like. If it was unsimulated there wouldn't be such a care to imply that more is going on while hiding the actual penetration, stroking, fingering, etc. just out of frame.
I understand the drive to try to find hot unsimulated content in movies and TV, but I think a lot of it is wishful thinking. The reality is that it's super rare and filmmakers are increasingly apt at making explicit sex scenes without involving their actors in real sexual activity, especially now with prosthetics and digital composition/AI. Unless you're shooting porn or trying to provoke or make a point about eroticism, anyone who's ever been on a film set could tell you - with lighting adjustments, and camera resets, and doing many takes, and keeping up with the dialogue - it's a lot easier for everyone involved to have them pretend instead of actually fucking.
This is ridiculous because people generally want to see a lot of sex on certain categories of films, real sex attracts masses of people. Directors are stupid.There's some kind of plastic or fabric covering, I don't think that's a condom or the texture of his balls.
View attachment 137458671
View attachment 137458681
View attachment 137458691
Anyway, you can tell just from the way the whole thing is shot that it's simulated sex. The angles, when they cut away, the fact that every time there's full frontal nudity they are flaccid. That's what simulated sex scenes look like. If it was unsimulated there wouldn't be such a care to imply that more is going on while hiding the actual penetration, stroking, fingering, etc. just out of frame.
I understand the drive to try to find hot unsimulated content in movies and TV, but I think a lot of it is wishful thinking. The reality is that it's super rare and filmmakers are increasingly apt at making explicit sex scenes without involving their actors in real sexual activity, especially now with prosthetics and digital composition/AI. Unless you're shooting porn or trying to provoke or make a point about eroticism, anyone who's ever been on a film set could tell you - with lighting adjustments, and camera resets, and doing many takes, and keeping up with the dialogue - it's a lot easier for everyone involved to have them pretend instead of actually fucking.
Some of us have been pretending instead of fucking for decades!There's some kind of plastic or fabric covering, I don't think that's a condom or the texture of his balls.
View attachment 137458671
View attachment 137458681
View attachment 137458691
Anyway, you can tell just from the way the whole thing is shot that it's simulated sex. The angles, when they cut away, the fact that every time there's full frontal nudity they are flaccid. That's what simulated sex scenes look like. If it was unsimulated there wouldn't be such a care to imply that more is going on while hiding the actual penetration, stroking, fingering, etc. just out of frame.
I understand the drive to try to find hot unsimulated content in movies and TV, but I think a lot of it is wishful thinking. The reality is that it's super rare and filmmakers are increasingly apt at making explicit sex scenes without involving their actors in real sexual activity, especially now with prosthetics and digital composition/AI. Unless you're shooting porn or trying to provoke or make a point about eroticism, anyone who's ever been on a film set could tell you - with lighting adjustments, and camera resets, and doing many takes, and keeping up with the dialogue - it's a lot easier for everyone involved to have them pretend instead of actually fucking.
Porn is not the same as a film, sorrySome of us have been pretending instead of fucking for decades!
But seriously, with ratings and guidelines and things, and the internet, most directors probably just think it isn't worth it. If people want real fucking, porn is Very easy to find...why bother?
It can happen, no problem, our lives don't depend on it, peaceThanks Sherlock.
You COMPLETELY misunderstood my statements.
At all.
Try again. Or not, I don't care...
Sorry
100% relevant. Thanks.please keep posts relevant to the topic or take the discussion private. Posting some actual content would also be good.
Is this a film?!Scenes from Desaprender a Dormir / Unlearning to Sleep
View attachment 138271781View attachment 138272801