Vince sant

Also you need to take Wikipedia with a grain of salt. Some things are not true. They are one sided views. That appendix article the word may is used a few times. Other sources are more reliable. I’m in the medical field and would never use Wikipedia.
 
Also you need to take Wikipedia with a grain of salt. Some things are not true. They are one sided views. That appendix article the word may is used a few times. Other sources are more reliable. I’m in the medical field and would never use Wikipedia.
Wikipedia is literally built upon the use of better more reliable sources though. No offense to you but I really dislike the "wikipedia bad" rhetoric. Its a good tool (for finding other sources all in one place)
 
That’s such a sad and uneducated post. SMH if it wansnt supposed to be there then it wouldn’t be.
So you've never once in your entire life had a haircut or shaved or trimmed your nails because you thought it looked better? If it wasn't meant to be there it wouldn't be.
 
So you've never once in your entire life had a haircut or shaved or trimmed your nails because you thought it looked better? If it wasn't meant to be there it wouldn't be.
Hair is left over from when we had for and needed it. You think cave men had houses to keep them warm? And nails had their purpose back in the day as well but they wore down naturally. Exactly like rabbits teeth that don’t stop growing because they wear them down naturally. Seriously do your research before you make dumb remarks.
 
And appendix do not serve a purpose.
I didn’t say they did, now. They aided digestion of early man and their diet. That why I said it was vestigial. Your hair doesn’t largely serve a purpose but we still have it.
 
I think you are still missing my point or avoiding it.
I didn’t say they did, now. They aided digestion of early man and their diet. That why I said it was vestigial. Your hair doesn’t largely serve a purpose but we still have it.
I still think you are missing my point on your original comment or avoiding it. If you are going back to caveman days foreskins protected the head of the penis when we ran around through the bush with no clothes on. Now we wear nice soft undergarments to keep everything protected.
 
I think you are still missing my point or avoiding it.

I still think you are missing my point on your original comment or avoiding it. If you are going back to caveman days foreskins protected the head of the penis when we ran around through the bush with no clothes on. Now we wear nice soft undergarments to keep everything protected.
Are you kidding me? You are missing the point! The foreskin still has an active use now, it protects the sensitive tissue on the head. The whole point of the sensitivity is to make sex pleasurable, to promote procreation, but protect the head from the sun and bacteria. A healthy, clean penis is going to be the same whether it’s cut or uncut. Why are you trying to explain something you have no idea about, at least educate yourself.
 
Also have you ever taken a swap of under a foreskin and put it under a microscope? Full of bacteria. Hence why cervical cancer is twice as likely in women with uncut partners.
 
Good idea. Was just looking after him. Sorry old Beanie got everyone wound up with his negative comments and one eyed views. He definitely is a beautiful human specimen. You couldn’t change a thing about him. Really nice guy. Got a lot of time for him.