What Celebrity Would You Go Gay For?

[deleted1547822]

I'm not sure where you are getting that. I only see that applied to the Bi forum.

It’s in the terms/rules. “For the purposes of these sections, we consider bisexual to be 20/80 gay/straight or straight/gay.”

The math is pretty straightforward. More than 80% gay? answer the “ask a gay man” questions. More than 80% straight? this is your arena. A strict reading would prohibit 80% from those two forums, requiring 81% or more.

A moderator can chime in but we have long allowed responses from those 60%+ straight. Why does this upset you?

It doesn’t upset me, it’s just the interwebz... It does seem to me a little absurd to have admittedly gay guys answering questions posed to straight men. As I posted in a different thread:

“I think you would get a lot more straight "no" if the section were more restrictive. If you ask a straight man if he's ever wanted to suck his gym-mate's pecker, you're going to get a no. When you allow 80/20 (per the rules) or when higher gay ratios answer, you are more likely to get a yes.

In those latter cases, you don't have a straight man answering. You have a bi man who should stick to "ask a bi man" instead of answering in a category that he admittedly isn't a part of. It would make it a lot easier for the straight men to just answer no to the couched "are you secretly just a little bit gay" questions.”

 

[2029351]

It’s in the terms/rules. “For the purposes of these sections, we consider bisexual to be 20/80 gay/straight or straight/gay.”

The math is pretty straightforward. More than 80% gay? answer the “ask a gay man” questions. More than 80% straight? this is your arena.



It doesn’t upset me, it’s just the interwebz... It does seem to me a little absurd to have admittedly gay guys answering questions posed to straight men. As I posted in a different thread:

“I think you would get a lot more straight "no" if the section were more restrictive. If you ask a straight man if he's ever wanted to suck his gym-mate's pecker, you're going to get a no. When you allow 80/20 (per the rules) or when higher gay ratios answer, you are more likely to get a yes.

In those latter cases, you don't have a straight man answering. You have a bi man who should stick to "ask a bi man" instead of answering in a category that he admittedly isn't a part of. It would make it a lot easier for the straight men to just answer no to the couched "are you secretly just a little bit gay" questions.”

Personally I dont class myself as gay..I wud same im straight but very curious

 

[deleted1547822]

To answer the original question, Daryl Hannah or Jaime Lee Curtis.

;p

 

[deleted1547822]

Personally I dont class myself as gay..I wud same im straight but very curious

ok, but “for the purposes of these sections...” you’re bi.

 

[2029351]

To answer the original question, Daryl Hannah or Jaime Lee Curtis.

;p

Daryl Hannah in her day..breathtakingly pretty hmmm Jamie Curtis body was perfection!

 

[2029351]

ok, but “for the purposes of these sections...” you’re bi.

so if thats the case then should i be taking part at all?

 

[deleted1547822]

so if thats the case then should i be taking part at all?

not in “ask a straight man”, or reconsider your percentage rationale if you consider yourself straight.

 

[GoingOnABoeing]

not in “ask a straight man”, or reconsider your percentage rationale if you consider yourself straight.

You don't make the rules. As I've always interpreted it, the 80/20 and vice versa just means you are welcome to post in the Bi forum as well. We have a long precedent of allowing 60%+ straight to post here. If you don't won't to see diverse opinions and topics then this might not be the best website for you.[/QUOTE]

 

[deleted1547822]

You don't make the rules. As I've always interpreted it, the 80/20 and vice versa just means you are welcome to post in the Bi forum as well. We have a long precedent of allowing 60%+ straight to post here. If you don't won't to see diverse opinions and topics then this might not be the best website for you.

[/QUOTE]

Neither do you. Doesn't matter how you've interpreted it, and your "long precedent" shit looks like it goes back to Jan 10, 2018.

70/30 isn't "straight", according to the posted rules. Scroll to the bottom, click the "Terms and Rules" link, and educate yourself. I didn't make those.

 

[GoingOnABoeing]

Neither do you. Doesn't matter how you've interpreted it, and your "long precedent" shit looks like it goes back to Jan 10, 2018.

70/30 isn't "straight", according to the posted rules. Scroll to the bottom, click the "Terms and Rules" link, and educate yourself. I didn't make those.[/QUOTE]

Settle down. No need to get nasty.Ya know, we do have the ability to look back at threads before we joined. There's plenty of posts from 60% and 70%'s here. If there was an issue, they would have been removed. Someone in another thread considers anything other than 100% straight to be bi.

FWIW, I would be in favor of a dedicated forum for the 100% straights where only they can talk amongst themselves. They are the most often to get bent out of shape on this site.

 

[deleted1547822]

You seem to keep missing the point. It’s not an issue of straights being to talk amongst themselves. It’s that it’s pointless to have an “ask a straight man” section for questions that not-straight men answer. Might as well just get rid of the delineations and lump it all under the “ask a man” section.

Turn it around and think of a “top or bottom” question in “ask a gay man”. Some 1% or 10% ‘gay’ guy (or a 30% that just fantasizes and considers himself straight) responds with “neither, I don’t like dicks or assholes”. It’s not helpful or useful.

 

[JayPR]

There are some people that are so fixated on rules, labels, right or wrong. Everything is black or white for them.

 

[6inchcock]

Do masculine lesbians count in this lunacy? Sorry just asking for a friend

 

[3368101]

Either Tom Holland or Cillian Murphy.

 

[Gj816]

Do masculine lesbians count in this lunacy? Sorry just asking for a friend

 

[cofrader]

Do masculine lesbians count in this lunacy? Sorry just asking for a friend

Not the case but I always loved Jodie foster, if I could be temporarily a woman and if she was available and willing ill give it a chance.
If it doesn’t work hey I got boobs for a while.

 

[Hungstraight]

Zac Efron, David Laid, Pietro Boselli...

 

[Motion-of-the-Ocean]

If a guy was curious and wanted to try man on man sex, what difference would it make that it was a celebrity or just some ordinary working stiff? Do you assume because someone has fame or wealth they are automatically more desirable and more likely to turn a man "gay"?

There are plenty of famous females whom I wouldn't mind having sex with if I had the chance but only because I find them attractive, but not because they are more or less desirable then any other woman.

So perhaps someone who was both bi-curious (or bi) and into starfucking might be able to choose one, but unless I could turn it into a Tell-All book deal, no male star really stands out.