Photos & Videos Yummyzine

[lukasprince]

Aaron mancus is the new model

Does Aaron go fully nude? He’s so hot

 

[yingxiong]

like

 

[Lolo28]

Kirill kabachenko

 

[carlillos444]

Luis Mayorquin

 

[Jupiter Street]

These are a few of my favourite things

 

[Yopr94]

Luis Mayorquin

He’s so hot

 

[Mats2023]

Kirill Strunnikov

View attachment 122240141View attachment 122240161View attachment 122240201View attachment 122240241View attachment 122240261View attachment 122240301View attachment 122240331

Un sueño hecho realidad. Finalmente ver a Kyrill completamente desnudo. MUCHAS GRACIAS.⚘️

 

[deleted12336311]

Michael Samperi?

 

[Jupiter Street]

Please por favor

 

[BellaDonna50]

Anyone have Patricio Manzotti from their new Beach Boys book? Looks like he went full frontal

 

[David Velle]

Kirill Strunnikov

View attachment 122240141View attachment 122240161View attachment 122240201View attachment 122240241View attachment 122240261View attachment 122240301View attachment 122240331

hot hairy uncut dick!

 

[NJMAY]

Oliver Baggerman

 

[holly7]

i'm struggling to work out the positioning of the brand at this point.

splitting main yummy mag up from yummyzine makes sense so there can be something of a line between working models and OF/rentmen/whoever the editorial team last slept with, but this beach boys is ... seemingly outtakes from existing yummy shoots? but still at full cost? is the expectation i spend £120 worth on merch (plus postage!) to ensure i get full coverage of paul ferrari's penis? and now they have a candle too? i get that there's some crossover between a good wank and essential oils but really, i'm a bit lost.

 

[Jupiter Street]

Oliver mi amor

 

[Lady Frost]

Oliver Baggerman

View attachment 122774011View attachment 122774041View attachment 122774061

Oliver is so hot

 

[bxbbybigd]

i'm struggling to work out the positioning of the brand at this point.

splitting main yummy mag up from yummyzine makes sense so there can be something of a line between working models and OF/rentmen/whoever the editorial team last slept with, but this beach boys is ... seemingly outtakes from existing yummy shoots? but still at full cost? is the expectation i spend £120 worth on merch (plus postage!) to ensure i get full coverage of paul ferrari's penis? and now they have a candle too? i get that there's some crossover between a good wank and essential oils but really, i'm a bit lost.

It seems like you enjoy criticising everything without attempting to understand. Firstly, Beach Boys is the photographer's debut book published by Yummy, who simply acts as the publisher, as they've stated. It seems they aim to broaden their brand by venturing into publishing, which isn't uncommon for other brands, as seen with Yearbook Fanzine, for instance. This is common to other magazine brands.

Regarding the content of Beach Boys, I notice several new models such as Micah Plath Alex Klose and Sergio Perdomo alongside familiar faces from Yummy, like Paul Ferrari, Owen Lindberg and Oliver Baggerman, but shot in distinct and completely new settings. While there may be a few outtakes with one or two models like Leon Valentin, they don't seem to constitute the majority at all.

Consider Steven Klein's recent book release, which features his best work, previously also seen in Yummy and other publications. By your logic, would then not be valid, but I disagree because a photographer can have a book with some outtakes of his best work and new work. If the theme of the book is boys at the beach, why wouldn't the photographer be allowed to use some of his best outtakes from so many beach shots he did to complement all the new content?

As for the candle, I agree it seems absurd, but perhaps it's a move to offer complementary coffee table products, given that Yummy's magazines often exude coffee table aesthetics.

 

[holly7]

It seems like you enjoy criticising everything without attempting to understand. Firstly, Beach Boys is the photographer's debut book published by Yummy, who simply acts as the publisher, as they've stated. It seems they aim to broaden their brand by venturing into publishing, which isn't uncommon for other brands, as seen with Yearbook Fanzine, for instance. This is common to other magazine brands.

Regarding the content of Beach Boys, I notice several new models such as Micah Plath Alex Klose and Sergio Perdomo alongside familiar faces from Yummy, like Paul Ferrari, Owen Lindberg and Oliver Baggerman, but shot in distinct and completely new settings. While there may be a few outtakes with one or two models like Leon Valentin, they don't seem to constitute the majority at all.

Consider Steven Klein's recent book release, which features his best work, previously also seen in Yummy and other publications. By your logic, would then not be valid, but I disagree because a photographer can have a book with some outtakes of his best work and new work. If the theme of the book is boys at the beach, why wouldn't the photographer be allowed to use some of his best outtakes from so many beach shots he did to complement all the new content?

As for the candle, I agree it seems absurd, but perhaps it's a move to offer complementary coffee table products, given that Yummy's magazines often exude coffee table aesthetics.

Sheesh, without attempting to understand? How highbrow! It's dick picks, my dude

 

[Jupiter Street]

And dick pics we should marvel at

 

[kowalski]

Regarding the content of Beach Boys, I notice several new models such as Micah Plath Alex Klose and Sergio Perdomo alongside familiar faces from Yummy, like Paul Ferrari, Owen Lindberg and Oliver Baggerman, but shot in distinct and completely new settings. While there may be a few outtakes with one or two models like Leon Valentin, they don't seem to constitute the majority at all.

Thank you for your comment. Just to add one point, I believe Sasha Olsen has had the idea of this book for quite some times, at least a couple of years. I am not surprised that over the last two years, when Sasha photographed models like Paul Ferrari and Oliver Baggerman for the magazine, he also took some photos particularly in a beach setting and saved the beach photos for his book. This saves time, effort and costs. So it might not be absolutely correct to call those as 'outtakes' in my opinion. But even if they are 'outtakes', as you said, there is nothing wrong for a photographer to include those in his book. At the end of the day, they are still photos 'new' to the public.

 

[suirius]

¿De Leon Valentín todavía nada?