Any cut guys want to discuss theirs?

[Cut9801]

All men in my gym look at my cut dick...i think they want to be as me..

 

[Luvcutdick]

In my part of the world when I was born, about 75% of guys were circumcised. I was told that I had been circumcised for cleanliness, less chance of infection, etc. It's a fairly tight cut with the frenulum removed.
Initially, it was difficult to masturbate because I couldn't easily get the feeling I needed to trigger orgasm, so a lot of my early orgasms were obtained with a back massager.
For quite a while I was not happy about it, feeling that I had a sensitive body part removed without my consent.
However, in more recent years I've been able to turn it around into a positive. I started to realise that a tight cut actually made me feel more naked, since my glans and slit were always exposed - something I became more aware of as I got more into nudism.
And, as my penis developed past puberty and the glans flared out, I found sufficient stimulation from the glans ridge, especially with lube. There is very little sensitivity on the shaft itself.
View attachment 80015691

That is a beautiful cut ............

 

[playklax01]

Yes, the first uncut dick that I sucked had an odor and an awful taste ......... never again

Ughhh...been there, done that. Totally agree with you!

 

[bloompark]

That's actually a good point. The glans is a very intimate part of my body and, in my case, quite large and prominent, and having no foreskin means I've no choice but to have it on show whenever I need to strip in the locker room.

I don't go out of the way to look at what other men have and, generally speaking, neither does anyone else, but circumcision is relatively unusual where I live and I'm sure that guys notice. I'm proud of my manhood so that's a good thing as far as I'm concerned.

Why were you done?

 

[Ausrob85]

Happy cut Aussie here, wouldn’t have it any other way. Been done since birth and am stoked that I didn’t have to get it done myself. Thanks mum!

 

[deleted18727341]

Cut by choice here. I prefer being cut, but realize it isn’t for everyone.

 

[Freshlycutluxembourg]

I got snipped at 40. just for the look. I‘m so happy with it

 

[hairybeast777]

I’m always up for discussion.

 

[datwhatilike]

I don't really like mine. I personally kind of find it strange when people compliment my dick for having a scar and dryness to it which I don't find appealing but maybe it's just me.

I feel this way. It's a source of a bit of resentment towards my parents for authorizing that for me at the age of 11. Phimosis can be solved without cutting.

 

[ronin001]

No complaints about being circumcised

View attachment 84519671

 

[ronin001]

No complaints about being circumcised,

 

[TeazeUrMind]

I was circumcised at birth. I vaguely remember having the conversation with my parents, they mentioned the usual, "It's cleaner" and "We wanted you to look like your father". I was adopted so there may have been more of a need to have me look like part of the family.
Personally, I'm fine with it. I've wondered what it would be like without it and truthfully I'm glad it was done.
I think my dick wouldn't have been one of the attractive uncut dicks but that's subjective.
I've had similar experiences as other people here. The first uncut dick I sucked, smelled absolutely awful. The experience was terrible, I didn't do it for very long because I couldn't stand it. The second uncut guy I dated, smelled terrible, too. I even tried washing it for him a couple of times and the smell would not go away. It was a real turnoff.
The third guy I dated was uncut, and magnificent. It's arguably the most beautiful dick I've seen. Top 5. Most memorable head I've ever given.

So, numbers-wise, 3 of the 6 uncut dicks I've experienced smelled pretty bad. Of the circumcised dicks I've experienced. 4 out of 50 were smelly.

When I bottom, I have noticed that cut dicks feel better as none of the uncut guys I've had sex with felt great. Less friction I guess?

But this is a tough debate because some of us are GLAD we were circumcised, some are glad they weren't, some are sad they didn't have a choice. The debate is subjective, but I feel the procedure is odd and mean to do to a baby but perfectly fine if you do it on your own volition or for medical reasons.

Sorry, my answer is complicated but I overthink a lot of things and this is a topic I feel I can contribute a lot to as I've dealt with a lot of dicks.
I attached pics of mine just so you can debate in your head whether or not my dick would have looked good uncircumcised.

 

[deleted948863]

Been cut for as long as I remember. Don’t really have any issues with sensation or anything. I don’t mind being cut at all.

 

[ukboy]

I was circumcised 9 years ago due to a tight frenulum. I always preferred the look of a cut cock and have found it cleaner than when I was uncut. Very happy with my high and tight cut.

 

[deleted8893071]

Enjoyed reading peoples thoughts and experiences. I don't know if I am a bit odd on the matter, technically I don't feel pro or con on the matter. It's a matter of choice more as an adult.

My story begins with having kept my foreskin retracted for as long I can remember, that's another story. By *Mod edit* foreskin stayed pretty much retracted. In only a few rare instances, would the foreskin roll over the head and I could feel it go over. Not being one to have foreskin over the head, I would find a place or moment to adjust it back and problem solved. The foreskin seemed trained to stay back as I could roll it over the head and if I gave it just enough time, you could see it gradually roll itself back behind the head.

While I was in the Navy, I was circumcised, again that's another story. I was just under 21. 20 years after, I've learned to adapt and like or dislike things about being circumcised. I didn't go through as much adjustment as some guys have gone through, the constant glans exposure-sensitivity issue was not much of a problem. Where I had to adjust was in the way of masturbating. I relied heavily on stimulating the inner lining of the foreskin. I was not much of a foreskin head stroker, like most uncircumcised seem to be. I kept the foreskin back and used mid shaft strokes, I typically kept the foreskin back behind the head allowing it on occasion to go over the head. I suspect as a teen it was a way of keeping leaking fluids, precum or failed ejaculation fluids contained within the foreskin. That all worked well with the inner foreskin, however I lost a lot of that through circumcision.

In the twenty years since, I've learned to find other areas on my cock that will induce some intense erections by rubbing still around the mid-shaft area, however I can't cum that way. I sort of found what I surmise is my frenulum, I didn't have much of one prior to circumcision and there's nothing there now. However, I noticed through the years a lot of cut guys using a grip method just under the glans that puts pressure just under the head (the frenulum), the snug grip with just a few minutes of stroking will have me cum. This is why I don't use the grip as much or not if I don't want to cum quickly. The friction directly rubs what nerve-endings I still have in the frenulum.

As for the glans, it's a great source of sensation still post circumcision but I can't cum that way. I notice guys can grip their glans and cum fairly fast that way. I can't do that. It's too much. Rubbing the coronal ridge of the glans is also another great area of sensation and that has never changed again I can't cum that way, pre or post. On ejaculation, I can't rub the glans, some cut guys rub it like crazy. It's too much for me. Oddity for me, before circumcision my glans didn't seem to be so sensitive post ejaculation, even while the head remained exposed and I could rub it directly with whatever. Post-circumcision, the head can become super sensitive. Can't say what is going there.

Over all appearance, this may be more of a visual perception, it does seem that the coronal rim of the head is more pronounced and size wise the glans looks a bit fuller. On the plus that I've come to appreciate, purely a personal matter, its noticing the color, enlargement and hardness of the glans as I go through cycles of high-arousal, much like seeing a clitoris change. I may have had the same effects earlier but I was just not as observant, don't know. Also the foreskin use to absorb the precum I would emit I only once got to see myself drip precum. Now with no foreskin, I'm still not a great producer of precum, but the fluid will drip freely creating some nice strands from time to time. That's got to be a plus for any guy, right!

As for having male sexual partners, I am Bi, I seem to have a tendency for gravitating towards uncircumcised guys. They seem more gentler when masturbating, some cut guys are rough grippers.

 

[rockettt]

what do you wanna hear?

 

[deleted19507421]

I'm uncut, most men are in catholic countries and I'm glad I am that way. The foreskin is part of my body and it has a function. It protects the glans. It also keeps your glans much more sensitive to touch and stimulation. But for me there's more, an uncut cock smells more manly, is more beautiful. I hear so many cut guys saying nobody asked their opinion about getting circumcised and they regret getting it

 

[Luvcutdick]

I was circumcised at birth. I vaguely remember having the conversation with my parents, they mentioned the usual, "It's cleaner" and "We wanted you to look like your father". I was adopted so there may have been more of a need to have me look like part of the family.
Personally, I'm fine with it. I've wondered what it would be like without it and truthfully I'm glad it was done.
I think my dick wouldn't have been one of the attractive uncut dicks but that's subjective.
I've had similar experiences as other people here. The first uncut dick I sucked, smelled absolutely awful. The experience was terrible, I didn't do it for very long because I couldn't stand it. The second uncut guy I dated, smelled terrible, too. I even tried washing it for him a couple of times and the smell would not go away. It was a real turnoff.
The third guy I dated was uncut, and magnificent. It's arguably the most beautiful dick I've seen. Top 5. Most memorable head I've ever given.

So, numbers-wise, 3 of the 6 uncut dicks I've experienced smelled pretty bad. Of the circumcised dicks I've experienced. 4 out of 50 were smelly.

When I bottom, I have noticed that cut dicks feel better as none of the uncut guys I've had sex with felt great. Less friction I guess?

But this is a tough debate because some of us are GLAD we were circumcised, some are glad they weren't, some are sad they didn't have a choice. The debate is subjective, but I feel the procedure is odd and mean to do to a baby but perfectly fine if you do it on your own volition or for medical reasons.

Sorry, my answer is complicated but I overthink a lot of things and this is a topic I feel I can contribute a lot to as I've dealt with a lot of dicks.
I attached pics of mine just so you can debate in your head whether or not my dick would have looked good uncircumcised.
View attachment 84618131View attachment 84618181View attachment 84618191

U did a great job with your narrative !

My first uncut was smelly. A turn-off. All other guys have been cut. That being said, I have seen some really great, uncut dicks on this site.

 

[Luvcutdick]

Enjoyed reading peoples thoughts and experiences. I don't know if I am a bit odd on the matter, technically I don't feel pro or con on the matter. It's a matter of choice more as an adult.

My story begins with having kept my foreskin retracted for as long I can remember, that's another story. By *Mod edit* foreskin stayed pretty much retracted. In only a few rare instances, would the foreskin roll over the head and I could feel it go over. Not being one to have foreskin over the head, I would find a place or moment to adjust it back and problem solved. The foreskin seemed trained to stay back as I could roll it over the head and if I gave it just enough time, you could see it gradually roll itself back behind the head.

While I was in the Navy, I was circumcised, again that's another story. I was just under 21. 20 years after, I've learned to adapt and like or dislike things about being circumcised. I didn't go through as much adjustment as some guys have gone through, the constant glans exposure-sensitivity issue was not much of a problem. Where I had to adjust was in the way of masturbating. I relied heavily on stimulating the inner lining of the foreskin. I was not much of a foreskin head stroker, like most uncircumcised seem to be. I kept the foreskin back and used mid shaft strokes, I typically kept the foreskin back behind the head allowing it on occasion to go over the head. I suspect as a teen it was a way of keeping leaking fluids, precum or failed ejaculation fluids contained within the foreskin. That all worked well with the inner foreskin, however I lost a lot of that through circumcision.

In the twenty years since, I've learned to find other areas on my cock that will induce some intense erections by rubbing still around the mid-shaft area, however I can't cum that way. I sort of found what I surmise is my frenulum, I didn't have much of one prior to circumcision and there's nothing there now. However, I noticed through the years a lot of cut guys using a grip method just under the glans that puts pressure just under the head (the frenulum), the snug grip with just a few minutes of stroking will have me cum. This is why I don't use the grip as much or not if I don't want to cum quickly. The friction directly rubs what nerve-endings I still have in the frenulum.

As for the glans, it's a great source of sensation still post circumcision but I can't cum that way. I notice guys can grip their glans and cum fairly fast that way. I can't do that. It's too much. Rubbing the coronal ridge of the glans is also another great area of sensation and that has never changed again I can't cum that way, pre or post. On ejaculation, I can't rub the glans, some cut guys rub it like crazy. It's too much for me. Oddity for me, before circumcision my glans didn't seem to be so sensitive post ejaculation, even while the head remained exposed and I could rub it directly with whatever. Post-circumcision, the head can become super sensitive. Can't say what is going there.

Over all appearance, this may be more of a visual perception, it does seem that the coronal rim of the head is more pronounced and size wise the glans looks a bit fuller. On the plus that I've come to appreciate, purely a personal matter, its noticing the color, enlargement and hardness of the glans as I go through cycles of high-arousal, much like seeing a clitoris change. I may have had the same effects earlier but I was just not as observant, don't know. Also the foreskin use to absorb the precum I would emit I only once got to see myself drip precum. Now with no foreskin, I'm still not a great producer of precum, but the fluid will drip freely creating some nice strands from time to time. That's got to be a plus for any guy, right!

As for having male sexual partners, I am Bi, I seem to have a tendency for gravitating towards uncircumcised guys. They seem more gentler when masturbating, some cut guys are rough grippers.

Another great narrative ........... plus there are a lot of similarities between us. I was cut at age 19. There was really no need to have it cut; my doctor tried to persuade me because he felt I had the "perfect" foreskin. I did it to "fit in". No real regrets, however, I am developing a preference for uncut, providing they don't smell.

I must say I have seen some really nice uncut dicks on this site.

 

[bloompark]

Was

Enjoyed reading peoples thoughts and experiences. I don't know if I am a bit odd on the matter, technically I don't feel pro or con on the matter. It's a matter of choice more as an adult.

My story begins with having kept my foreskin retracted for as long I can remember, that's another story. By *Mod edit* foreskin stayed pretty much retracted. In only a few rare instances, would the foreskin roll over the head and I could feel it go over. Not being one to have foreskin over the head, I would find a place or moment to adjust it back and problem solved. The foreskin seemed trained to stay back as I could roll it over the head and if I gave it just enough time, you could see it gradually roll itself back behind the head.

While I was in the Navy, I was circumcised, again that's another story. I was just under 21. 20 years after, I've learned to adapt and like or dislike things about being circumcised. I didn't go through as much adjustment as some guys have gone through, the constant glans exposure-sensitivity issue was not much of a problem. Where I had to adjust was in the way of masturbating. I relied heavily on stimulating the inner lining of the foreskin. I was not much of a foreskin head stroker, like most uncircumcised seem to be. I kept the foreskin back and used mid shaft strokes, I typically kept the foreskin back behind the head allowing it on occasion to go over the head. I suspect as a teen it was a way of keeping leaking fluids, precum or failed ejaculation fluids contained within the foreskin. That all worked well with the inner foreskin, however I lost a lot of that through circumcision.

In the twenty years since, I've learned to find other areas on my cock that will induce some intense erections by rubbing still around the mid-shaft area, however I can't cum that way. I sort of found what I surmise is my frenulum, I didn't have much of one prior to circumcision and there's nothing there now. However, I noticed through the years a lot of cut guys using a grip method just under the glans that puts pressure just under the head (the frenulum), the snug grip with just a few minutes of stroking will have me cum. This is why I don't use the grip as much or not if I don't want to cum quickly. The friction directly rubs what nerve-endings I still have in the frenulum.

As for the glans, it's a great source of sensation still post circumcision but I can't cum that way. I notice guys can grip their glans and cum fairly fast that way. I can't do that. It's too much. Rubbing the coronal ridge of the glans is also another great area of sensation and that has never changed again I can't cum that way, pre or post. On ejaculation, I can't rub the glans, some cut guys rub it like crazy. It's too much for me. Oddity for me, before circumcision my glans didn't seem to be so sensitive post ejaculation, even while the head remained exposed and I could rub it directly with whatever. Post-circumcision, the head can become super sensitive. Can't say what is going there.

Over all appearance, this may be more of a visual perception, it does seem that the coronal rim of the head is more pronounced and size wise the glans looks a bit fuller. On the plus that I've come to appreciate, purely a personal matter, its noticing the color, enlargement and hardness of the glans as I go through cycles of high-arousal, much like seeing a clitoris change. I may have had the same effects earlier but I was just not as observant, don't know. Also the foreskin use to absorb the precum I would emit I only once got to see myself drip precum. Now with no foreskin, I'm still not a great producer of precum, but the fluid will drip freely creating some nice strands from time to time. That's got to be a plus for any guy, right!

As for having male sexual partners, I am Bi, I seem to have a tendency for gravitating towards uncircumcised guys. They seem more gentler when masturbating, some cut guys are rough grippers.

Was the navy happy to get you circumcised?