Armie hammer!

Omg... why no D leaks?
Come on, it only requires a very small amount of common sense.

Uhmm... you guys are clearly missing the point.

Clearly.

By "houseofeffie (and other victims) ain't cray-cray" I meant that they are at least knowledgeable of the law (unlike SOME people here.)

Yes they all wanted the D.

Like, duh!

99% of visitors here want the d!

But at this point in time with their current relationship with Armie, if they do so what y'all want, then how will they be perceived?

Ever heard of revenge porn?
Yeah.

They want consequences with his actions: they want to expose him as a person, not his D to the entire world.

And yes, I'd also like to see the D.

But if one of the victims leak the D, it'll (the leak-er) be VERY easily tracked (with Armie and his family's billions helping) and then hello lawsuit!
:)


:)
*Crystal Meth, "Ms. Cayman," Smoking, etc, were from his secret private account only followed by a few selected people.
*If a D is leaked,
Armie will just nonchalantly scroll through his messages,
look for the specific D pic,
look for the time when he sent the D pic
and which girl he sent it to,
and boom we got ourselves a new headline.
Do y'all really think the victims will want that?

Mystery solved!
:)


Also, I know we all are anxiously awaiting for the LA Times cover that will "break everything" so, like some of y'all I'm working on limited info from following ths story since it surfaced.

Have a nice night, y'all.


How is it possible that he didn’t share his cock pics?

Answer:
:) RE.VENGE.POOOORNNN. :)
 
surprised no one has shared this yet...
saw it on HBO and just had a chuckle like, "ohhhh" so thought y'all should too :)

Y’all know that boy isn’t a real cannibal. It’s weird how this could kill his career when The Long Ranger and Man from UNCLE didn’t.
Actually, aside from the alleged victims, NOBODY knows for sure.
The upcoming article will shed light to that, then we can get back to this. :)
 
Well, apparently House of Effie (the woman who started this shitshow) is basically being dropped even by the other alleged victims and it's no more a reliable source for the scandal.

I think he was abusive to women but only in consensual terms (?) and people tried to make this whole mess bigger than it is/was.

Also, she keeps involving AH and Elizabeth's kids in this, which is very weird. I think she enjoys this very much, now she gained a platform and she's not using it right.

Bit the real question is: why am I so interested in this? I need therapy.
 
Well, apparently House of Effie (the woman who started this shitshow) is basically being dropped even by the other alleged victims and it's no more a reliable source for the scandal.

I think he was abusive to women but only in consensual terms (?) and people tried to make this whole mess bigger than it is/was.

Also, she keeps involving AH and Elizabeth's kids in this, which is very weird. I think she enjoys this very much, now she gained a platform and she's not using it right.

Bit the real question is: why am I so interested in this? I need therapy.
How does she involve Elizabeth and the kids? I don’t follow her so idk what’s going on. But yeah odd if she does
 
Oh, you're sure.
We'll see how well this post holds up. :)

No need to by psycho about it tho.

How does she involve Elizabeth and the kids? I don’t follow her so idk what’s going on. But yeah odd if she does

She's basically mentioning them in the discourse now and again.
 
Well, apparently House of Effie (the woman who started this shitshow) is basically being dropped even by the other alleged victims and it's no more a reliable source for the scandal.

I think he was abusive to women but only in consensual terms (?) and people tried to make this whole mess bigger than it is/was.

Also, she keeps involving AH and Elizabeth's kids in this, which is very weird. I think she enjoys this very much, now she gained a platform and she's not using it right.

Bit the real question is: why am I so interested in this? I need therapy.

Of course there's "no need to by[sic] psycho about it."

Btw, good luck on your therapy.
Let's just hope they can, you know, help you.
 
Well, apparently House of Effie (the woman who started this shitshow) is basically being dropped even by the other alleged victims and it's no more a reliable source for the scandal.

I think he was abusive to women but only in consensual terms (?) and people tried to make this whole mess bigger than it is/was.

Also, she keeps involving AH and Elizabeth's kids in this, which is very weird. I think she enjoys this very much, now she gained a platform and she's not using it right.

Bit the real question is: why am I so interested in this? I need therapy.

wow you should see her instagram stories.
I really don’t know about other women and what they are saying, but only focusing on her and her stories she really and strongly comes over as an unreliable source and person! If you have been victimized like you are saying, then what the fuck... diagnosing yourself with Stockholm syndrome is a bit weird for me...
 
  • Like
Reactions: baby g
Of course there's "no need to by[sic] psycho about it."

Btw, good luck on your therapy.
Let's just hope they can, you know, help you.

giphy.gif
 
  • Like
Reactions: Lindsaykoslovsky
There has been texts and audible evidence of his behavior, yet still people are more inclined to believe the victim is lying. It's so predictable.
Notice how little we see of "the victim's" texts in response?
VERY interesting that....
 
  • Like
Reactions: baby g and Uic94
Notice how little we see of "the victim's" texts in response?
VERY interesting that....
You just proved the point. The insanely high bar victims must jump through to be deemed "believable" when the perp is a blandly sexy white man.
 
You just proved the point. The insanely high bar victims must jump through to be deemed "believable" when the perp is a blandly sexy white man.
It's an "insane high bar" to also post what you are replying to a person so people can see both sides of a conversation?

The replies probably went something like "Hmmmmm..Can't wait for you to taste me.."

Be a bit harder to call them a victim then wouldn't it?
 
There has been texts and audible evidence of his behavior, yet still people are more inclined to believe the victim is lying. It's so predictable.

Has anyone said she is "lying" about what Armie said?

Or is that just your lazy cliche'd narrative on this sort of issue?

People have identified that certain messages point to this being consensual, reciprocal behaviour. Before we judge more, we want to see more. Easy to understand.

You're so predictable.
 
You just proved the point. The insanely high bar victims must jump through to be deemed "believable" when the perp is a blandly sexy white man.

Hmm why bland?

He is a major film star.

You are talking about him here.

He seems VERY kinky and out-there according to these texts.

He has insane wealth compared with others.

There is literally NO factor based on which he would be called "bland".
 
  • Like
Reactions: danerain