Brian Jordan Alvarez

i hope Ebeling is charged with making a false police report, and the LA prosecutor seeks the most aggressive carceral sentence in line with the typcial sentence for the crime he falsified. If you get two years in jail for sexual assault, you get two years in jail for falsely accusing someone of sexual assault.

then, i hope BJA sues Ebeling for millions for libel & defamation. Ebeling said he was raped, and, unless he is a transgender, that’s objectively a lie in California.

my final hope is gay rights organizations support BJA’s legal defense and campaign against this horrific hate crime against the gay community that uses the nonsense trope that homosexual men are really sexual predators of men who fuck women. men who fuck women are the oppressor class for gay men, the class who commits all gay bashing, the class who hate us for existing as homosexual. heterosupremacy is not ok, certainly not in California.
Ok brian
 
males can’t be raped in California. it’s the law. Ebeling said BJA raped him, an impossibility. That’s libel. Rape doesn’t mean sexual assault in the way murder does not mean kill. Rape is a special crime where the victim must be female and be vaginaly penetrated with a penis because biology means this is a far different and worse crime than other unwanted sexual activity. As ABC News now knows, don’t say rape when no rape occurred or be prepared to pay up.

Please cite specifically the California Penal code that supports this because you are talking out your fucking ass because I certainly cannot find any reference specifically "women" or exclusively "vaginal". ABC paid out because it wasn't worth pursuing in court and what was paid was a charitable contribution that can be written off on their taxes.
 
Calling me a rape apologist is libel. Your IP address is tracked. Get a lawyer.

Rape is sexual intercourse. Sexual intercourse is penis in vagina.
California Code, PEN 261.
https://www.justia.com/documents/criminal-law-calcrim.pdf
maybe the legal terminology isn't rape, but that's just semantics because sexual assault is sexual assault and being coerced into performing oral sex against your will is still rape. and you need to stop defending scumbags who commit sexual assaults or else more people will call you a rape apologist.
 
easy to connect the dots between a man spreading lies that play on the blood libel that gay men are sexual predators of defenseless heterosexual men when you see the motivation is a big fat payout from the star & creator of a wildly successful national TV show
MSN
 
easy to connect the dots between a man spreading lies that play on the blood libel that gay men are sexual predators of defenseless heterosexual men when you see the motivation is a big fat payout from the star & creator of a wildly successful national TV show
MSN
except these allegations have been around for years, mentioned in this very thread in 2021 and elsewhere before!... so a long time before his successful sitcom
 
except these allegations have been around for years, mentioned in this very thread in 2021 and elsewhere before!... so a long time before his successful sitcom
you're saying is mendacity his better linked to the Will & Grace reboot, and he only ramped it up with The English Teacher. solid analysis.
 
you're saying is mendacity his better linked to the Will & Grace reboot, and he only ramped it up with The English Teacher. solid analysis.
God I wish you would stop peppering your replies with deep cut thesaurus words to make yourself sound smarter. It's almost worse than you being selectively illiterate.
 
God I wish you would stop peppering your replies with deep cut thesaurus words to make yourself sound smarter. It's almost worse than you being selectively illiterate.
my wish is that men who fuck women like you stop spreading the dangerous myth of the gay male like me as sexual predator of defenseless men in our oppressor class.
 
  • Like
Reactions: colorfulkent
my wish is that men who fuck women like you stop spreading the dangerous myth of the gay male like me as sexual predator of defenseless men in our oppressor class.
I have never fucked a woman lmao. Stop making shit up. What skeletons do you have in your closet?
 
  • Like
Reactions: NamourTheRuler
California law specifies that rape can be against a female or male. The law defines rape as penetration and the victim not being married to the person at the time. I guess spousal rape still isn’t a thing there.

As there wasn’t penetration alleged in this case, it’s sexual assault. Will that now make @cdnla310 happy? Brian will have to say that he sexually assaulted somebody but didn’t rape them. I’m not sure how one sounds better than the other.
 
who is they?
California law specifies that rape can be against a female or male. The law defines rape as penetration and the victim not being married to the person at the time. I guess spousal rape still isn’t a thing there.

As there wasn’t penetration alleged in this case, it’s sexual assault. Will that now make @cdnla310 happy? Brian will have to say that he sexually assaulted somebody but didn’t rape them. I’m not sure how one sounds better than the other.
rape is sexual intercourse and sexual intercourse is penis in vagina. us californians define our laws that way because we aren’t raging misogynists who equate sexual acts between men to forcible procreation where a woman both can’t defend herself against male biology and where her own biology forces her into the impossible decision that results from that forcible procreation. mendacious men used the word rape to describe both BJA and my defense of BJA because they literally believe a man’s cock momentarily on another man’s lip with whom he’d previously enjoyed coonsensual oral while filming a highly sexual, non-union, trying-to-get-buzz streaming show is the same as a 200 lb man who benches 250 overpowering & impregnating a 120 lb woman. textbook misogyny that denies biological reality, similar to but orders of magnitude more harmful than pretending a man is a they.
https://www.justia.com/documents/criminal-law-calcrim.pdf
 
  • Like
Reactions: colorfulkent
who is they?

rape is sexual intercourse and sexual intercourse is penis in vagina. us californians define our laws that way because we aren’t raging misogynists who equate sexual acts between men to forcible procreation where a woman both can’t defend herself against male biology and where her own biology forces her into the impossible decision that results from that forcible procreation. mendacious men used the word rape to describe both BJA and my defense of BJA because they literally believe a man’s cock momentarily on another man’s lip with whom he’d previously enjoyed coonsensual oral while filming a highly sexual, non-union, trying-to-get-buzz streaming show is the same as a 200 lb man who benches 250 overpowering & impregnating a 120 lb woman. textbook misogyny that denies biological reality, similar to but orders of magnitude more harmful than pretending a man is a they.
https://www.justia.com/documents/criminal-law-calcrim.pdf
The crime of rape contains the following elements, all of which must be proven beyond a reasonable doubt: The defendant had sexual intercourse with a woman (or man). They were not married at the time of the intercourse. The other party did not consent to the intercourse.

California Penal Code Section 261 PC: Rape