Bromantic Pics

I knew this was going to eventually degenerate into this. why can't you lot just keep scrolling down or click 'x'.

your brand of bromance is everywhere. Try MLB NFL NHL and the like...

I guess I liken it to uncharacteristic or candid tenderness, kindness, softness, romance and general male male beauty pics.

I'll leave this thread till a quorum or decision is made. sigh

:(
 

Attachments

I guess I liken it to uncharacteristic or candid tenderness, kindness, softness, romance and general male male beauty pics.
What you are describing here is romance between two men. I am saying that there is a difference between intimacy and friendship. Most of the pictures here, if they don't suggest sex (and half of them do), at least suggest an intimate, perhaps romantic, relationship between the guys in the picture. I'm not saying that there's anything wrong with intimacy between men. I'm just saying that it's not what's commonly known as bromance. By conjuring up intimate sexual images every time you imagine a relationship between two men, you deny the possibility that men, both straight and gay, can make close relationships with other men that do not involve sex and that these types of relationships can be rewarding in their own way.
 
  • Like
Reactions: upinseattle
If you don't like the pics we are posting, then get off your ass and post some of your own. Otherwise, let those of us that enjoy these pics, no matter how accurate the title of the thread is, enjoy this without negative comments. No one is making you look at the pics. It is YOUR choice to open this thread and look at the pics. It is also your choice to NOT complain about the efforts of the rest of us.
Besides, if you even bothered to read the very first post, you will see that I also asked for the pics you are bitching about.

[Bromance pics, pals/buddies, snuggling... Anything, straight or gay that has guys breaking the "I'm too macho to do that" boundaries.
 
  • Like
Reactions: jiminpgh
I knew this was going to eventually degenerate into this. why can't you lot just keep scrolling down or click 'x'.

your brand of bromance is everywhere. Try MLB NFL NHL and the like...

I'll degenerate it more (lol).

I help run a rugby club. The other day one player had concussion after a game & was sick (vomited). Until the ambulance arrived another player had his arms around the sick guy's shoulders & was cradling his head, just to make sure he kept conscious. These are the same guys that beat up the other team and have girlfriends. In 'intimate' team sports its not so much bromance but being comfortable in touching.
 
I have been enjoying these pics and, frankly, I appreciate the commentary and discussion around them, too. The comments about many of these not being "bromance" and more "romance" are legit, I think, and I would argue that the guy who was making the observation was saying just that and not really criticizing.

While I'm attracted to men and women, I mentioned earlier on this thread that the intimacy that was the sub-text of most of these photos was something I crave with other men. I've had one or two true "bromances" I guess where there was a real closeness with another guy but nothing sexual at all. I valued those, and, in fact, would welcome more of them. However, as part of those relationships, we were more comfortable touching, being in each other's space, and just being unguarded than I find many men are willing (or even want) to be.

So, a pic of a guy with his head on another's shoulder asleep, or rubbing another's back, or wrestling playfully would accurately reflect bromance aspects in my opinion. Tenderness, kindness, concern, affection, and the like does not necessarily indicate romance or sexuality.

That said, I have to agree with some of the posters who say that there is an implied sexuality (and an obvious one in some cases) to many of these photos. I'm not complaining, and that sexuality is a bit different than the "hardcore" you see in true porn because it IS more about communicating intimacy rather than about body parts.

The one pic of the two guys kissing on what looks like a patio at night, and the one has the other's head in his hands as he kisses him gets me every time I see it. And by "gets me" I mean shoots straight through me to my groin and makes my cock tingle. It is intimate and sexy and damn I want some of that. :)
 
  • Like
Reactions: jiminpgh
Sorry that there is so much controversy over "Bromances" :-(
Anyone can skip pics that they find (in their interpretation of"Bromance") I just like the idea of guys with other guys in something closer than the accepted "norm"= like just horseplay, but even that is fine, too!
I hope we can get back to the original intent. And if some seem to be "bordering on sexual intimacy"---well that can happen, too and those who find that offensive can go on and find others that fit their sensitivities on this issue. NO NEED to be so judgmental about what another person finds "Bromance", right? Or am I way off base? I found some of the early posts so good and reflective of what I think many men would like to experience (or have in their lives.) Some have led to exploration and others have just allowed men to express their tender, intimate feelings with a close male friend. Is any or all of that so offensive that we have to leave the human interactions of man-to-man and only go to men and their affection for their pets? I regret the judgement of some who have to impose their views on others interpretation of "Bromance."
Just sayin' Rant over!
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: jiminpgh
I am pretty sure there is less offense and just that people like to point out inaccuracies. Some people are just assholes.

Sorry that there is so much controversy over "Bromances" :-(
Anyone can skip pics that they find (in their interpretation of"Bromance") I just like the idea of guys with other guys in something closer than the accepted "norm"= like just horseplay, but even that is fine, too!
I hope we can get back to the original intent. And if some seem to be "bordering on sexual intimacy"---well that can happen, too and those who find that offensive can go on and find others that fit their sensitivities on this issue. NO NEED to be so judgmental about what another person finds "Bromance", right? Or am I way off base? I found some of the early posts so good and reflective of what I think many men would like to experience (or have in their lives.) Some have led to exploration and others have just allowed men to express their tender, intimate feelings with a close male friend. Is any or all of that so offensive that we have to leave the human interactions of man-to-man and only go to men and their affection for their pets? I regret the judgement of some who have to impose their views on others interpretation of "Bromance."
Just sayin' Rant over!