Charlie Matthews

Posts Attachments
Sort by date Most Liked Posts
Mattnope3 said:
what is even the point of charging people without anything wed like to see?
Click to expand...
well because none of us are forced to do so.

subscribers have a choice to "subscribe" and it's not mandatory so he won't forcefully take money from our bank accounts.

If you don't like what you see:
DO NOT subscribe
Easy :)
 
  • Like
Reactions: laprol, Jack_anderson, tarheel6 and 3 others
Lindsaykoslovsky said:
well because none of us are forced to do so.

subscribers have a choice to "subscribe" and it's not mandatory so he won't forcefully take money from our bank accounts.

If you don't like what you see:
DO NOT subscribe
Easy :)
Click to expand...



thanks for the info Capt. Obvious
 
  • Like
Reactions: Tagood7
Lindsaykoslovsky said:
Right back at you, babe

"Capt. Obvious"?
That was LITERALLY the whole point of my reply
lol

Lol, can't read sarcasm?
Hahaha

Here ya go, hun:

Definition of SARCASM

Enjoy!
Click to expand...
But your reply didn’t really go with what he said. He wasn’t even acting like he was being forced to subscribe. He said would would be the point if there’s nothing worth it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Lindsaykoslovsky
Tagood7 said:
But your reply didn’t really go with what he said. He wasn’t even acting like he was being forced to subscribe. He said would would be the point if there’s nothing worth it.
Click to expand...

Ok... read the initial post again please :)

So here's how it went :)

* He replied to a ss of Charlie's twitter post (not sure) basically saying that he won't be posting frontals (also, I don't know the legitimacy of the ss.)
*He then replied, "what is even the point of charging people without anything wed[sic] like to see?"
1. Now my thought process with that comment is like, "Why'd you even have to type that?" Like, you do know that OnlyFans is not EXCLUSIVELY for nudity content (the things "wed[sic] like to see") as a LOT of people have their own workout/fitness-dedicated, cooking-dedicated, music-dedicated, etc, basically SFW-dedicated accounts, right? Contents that cater to SFW-seekers. Or are you just too hypnotized or misinformed with OnlyFans as the platform for d!cks and f*cks?
2. He mentioned "charging people" and like I said earlier, you don't have to subscribe. You DON'T have to subscribe! And in turn HE DOESN'T have to CHARGE YOU. He WON'T charge you if you don't subscribe. If you're all like, "Well, I don't like it if the content he'll put out doesn't contain nudity" or "what's even the point if there's no nudity?" Then, go! You do you. Don't subscribe. You know what happens then? You wanna know what happens next if you don't subscribe? What will happen is YOU WON'T BE CHARGED.
3. And the fact that he said, "Thanks, Capt. Obvious" and I'm like, "You still don't get it. I was seriously making fun of it. That's why I replied. The whole point of my first reply was a.) Not to help you, but b.) To laugh and go, "Are you serious right now? Like if it's such a problem to you or you get turned off that ge won't post nudity then don't subscribe. Just don't. Then you won't have the (eventual) problem of worrying about the fees. Period.

So what is the point of Charlie joining OnlyFans? The point is Charlie Matthews wants to post more of his content on OnlyFans. Contents, mind you, contents that Instagram deems too risque and to NSFW for the platform. And if you follow Charlie on IG, YOU'd know his frustration whenever he post a somewhat-almost-maybe risque photo (from his modelling work) on instagram that it'd be taken down minutes (or hours) later. So the way I see it, Charlie wanted to have another platform where he can post his risque-erotic-nsfw-deemed content without the possibility of it getting taken down AND at the same time, get paif for it.
So that's that.
My takeaway?
My takeaways would be OnlyFans is not JUST for nudity, anyone who joins OnlyFans are not obligated to post nudity (and yes, he didn't say it was an obligation but come on, I'm not stupid. That's what he impiles with, and I again quote, "wed[sic] like to see") and I called it.

:)
 
  • Like
Reactions: laprol
Lindsaykoslovsky said:
Ok... read the initial post again please :)

So here's how it went :)

* He replied to a ss of Charlie's twitter post (not sure) basically saying that he won't be posting frontals (also, I don't know the legitimacy of the ss.)
*He then replied, "what is even the point of charging people without anything wed[sic] like to see?"
1. Now my thought process with that comment is like, "Why'd you even have to type that?" Like, you do know that OnlyFans is not EXCLUSIVELY for nudity content (the things "wed[sic] like to see") as a LOT of people have their own workout/fitness-dedicated, cooking-dedicated, music-dedicated, etc, basically SFW-dedicated accounts, right? Contents that cater to SFW-seekers. Or are you just too hypnotized or misinformed with OnlyFans as the platform for d!cks and f*cks?
2. He mentioned "charging people" and like I said earlier, you don't have to subscribe. You DON'T have to subscribe! And in turn HE DOESN'T have to CHARGE YOU. He WON'T charge you if you don't subscribe. If you're all like, "Well, I don't like it if the content he'll put out doesn't contain nudity" or "what's even the point if there's no nudity?" Then, go! You do you. Don't subscribe. You know what happens then? You wanna know what happens next if you don't subscribe? What will happen is YOU WON'T BE CHARGED.
3. And the fact that he said, "Thanks, Capt. Obvious" and I'm like, "You still don't get it. I was seriously making fun of it. That's why I replied. The whole point of my first reply was a.) Not to help you, but b.) To laugh and go, "Are you serious right now? Like if it's such a problem to you or you get turned off that ge won't post nudity then don't subscribe. Just don't. Then you won't have the (eventual) problem of worrying about the fees. Period.

So what is the point of Charlie joining OnlyFans? The point is Charlie Matthews wants to post more of his content on OnlyFans. Contents, mind you, contents that Instagram deems too risque and to NSFW for the platform. And if you follow Charlie on IG, YOU'd know his frustration whenever he post a somewhat-almost-maybe risque photo (from his modelling work) on instagram that it'd be taken down minutes (or hours) later. So the way I see it, Charlie wanted to have another platform where he can post his risque-erotic-nsfw-deemed content without the possibility of it getting taken down AND at the same time, get paif for it.
So that's that.
My takeaway?
My takeaways would be OnlyFans is not JUST for nudity, anyone who joins OnlyFans are not obligated to post nudity (and yes, he didn't say it was an obligation but come on, I'm not stupid. That's what he impiles with, and I again quote, "wed[sic] like to see") and I called it.

:)
Click to expand...
Sorry, I don’t come here to read books.
 
  • Like
Reactions: alwaysaxyl, Eske85, justachicken and 2 others
Tagood7 said:
Sorry, I don’t come here to read books.
Click to expand...

Ohhhh, that's so sad :(
I can refer you to someone since you need help :(

I emphatize with you, I really do.

This country's education system needs improvement so it's never your fault. It's never your fault. :(

That's so sad.
I actually gave you a somewhat thought out answer so it breaks my heart, with your state and all.

It's okay.
It's okay.
It's never wrong to ask for help.
We're here for you
This can be a safe space for you now.
I'll send you my email and maybe we can have a one-on-one tutoring lessons so I can help you. :)
Let's do this together.

Sending all my love to you and your future.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Newboy777
Lindsaykoslovsky said:
Ok... read the initial post again please :)

So here's how it went :)

* He replied to a ss of Charlie's twitter post (not sure) basically saying that he won't be posting frontals (also, I don't know the legitimacy of the ss.)
*He then replied, "what is even the point of charging people without anything wed[sic] like to see?"
1. Now my thought process with that comment is like, "Why'd you even have to type that?" Like, you do know that OnlyFans is not EXCLUSIVELY for nudity content (the things "wed[sic] like to see") as a LOT of people have their own workout/fitness-dedicated, cooking-dedicated, music-dedicated, etc, basically SFW-dedicated accounts, right? Contents that cater to SFW-seekers. Or are you just too hypnotized or misinformed with OnlyFans as the platform for d!cks and f*cks?
2. He mentioned "charging people" and like I said earlier, you don't have to subscribe. You DON'T have to subscribe! And in turn HE DOESN'T have to CHARGE YOU. He WON'T charge you if you don't subscribe. If you're all like, "Well, I don't like it if the content he'll put out doesn't contain nudity" or "what's even the point if there's no nudity?" Then, go! You do you. Don't subscribe. You know what happens then? You wanna know what happens next if you don't subscribe? What will happen is YOU WON'T BE CHARGED.
3. And the fact that he said, "Thanks, Capt. Obvious" and I'm like, "You still don't get it. I was seriously making fun of it. That's why I replied. The whole point of my first reply was a.) Not to help you, but b.) To laugh and go, "Are you serious right now? Like if it's such a problem to you or you get turned off that ge won't post nudity then don't subscribe. Just don't. Then you won't have the (eventual) problem of worrying about the fees. Period.

So what is the point of Charlie joining OnlyFans? The point is Charlie Matthews wants to post more of his content on OnlyFans. Contents, mind you, contents that Instagram deems too risque and to NSFW for the platform. And if you follow Charlie on IG, YOU'd know his frustration whenever he post a somewhat-almost-maybe risque photo (from his modelling work) on instagram that it'd be taken down minutes (or hours) later. So the way I see it, Charlie wanted to have another platform where he can post his risque-erotic-nsfw-deemed content without the possibility of it getting taken down AND at the same time, get paif for it.
So that's that.
My takeaway?
My takeaways would be OnlyFans is not JUST for nudity, anyone who joins OnlyFans are not obligated to post nudity (and yes, he didn't say it was an obligation but come on, I'm not stupid. That's what he impiles with, and I again quote, "wed[sic] like to see") and I called it.

:)
Click to expand...
I agree with you. Charley clearly stated he won’t be posting full frontals. He is posting artistic nudes that Instagram won’t allow. If you don’t want to subscribe to Charley Matthew on onlyfans go somewhere else where other models can show dick and porn. Charley is one of top male models.
 
  • Like
Reactions: deewarc, JayceeReid, Xxgummyxx and 1 other person
Iknowsecrets123 said:
I agree with you. Charley clearly stated he won’t be posting full frontals. He is posting artistic nudes that Instagram won’t allow. If you don’t want to subscribe to Charley Matthew on onlyfans go somewhere else where other models can show dick and porn. Charley is one of top male models.
Click to expand...

Thank you very much :)

See... they get it :)
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

S
Cristian Onorato
Replies
2
Views
514
OnlyFans and Web Personalities
Fantasinas
F
T
Joshua Hee
Replies
1
Views
2K
Models and Celebrities
YvesSaidYes
Y
T
Hussein Beydoun (huss.bey)
Replies
3
Views
576
OnlyFans and Web Personalities
Filthy Boi Casual
F
DX2069
RizXTar (Indian Instagram model)
Replies
1
Views
1K
OnlyFans and Web Personalities
Anurag_9261
A
S
Pakistani model hot Twink on twitter
Replies
7
Views
1K
OnlyFans and Web Personalities
lestat1137
L
Remove Ads
Top Bottom