There were so many people taking what I said 100,000x more seriously than it was intended and clearly I'm not even that invested, and it was on the previous page which I didn't care to re-read for obvious reasons, so yes, I mixed you two up, they've been throwing a tantrum all day long. Anyway -- what you said reads that way. You're saying what I said is "punchable", lol, when no one asked by the way, how else am I going to read into that? I mean, look, you can get sensitively offended that 41.5-42 is factually several years off of 50 all day and night on an existential level despite triggering that reaction not being my intent at all with that comment, but it doesn't make what I'm saying untrue. And as I said, I was purposely emphasizing the 50 part to show how dramatic it is that he looks young when 50 is his next major age milestone, which is true. Which is why I didn't just say "for someone in their early 40s" because that isn't the point I was making from the start, so no I didn't screw up my articulation at all. No matter how badly you want it to be true, it's not. I said what I said. You all got upset. Also, the physical difference between a 2 and a 10 year old is substantially different than a 42 and 50 year old, for obvious reasons, so the point you're trying to make is completely incomparable. A baby/toddler > 5th grader is far different than an adult > adult, like, lol. And I'm sure there are 21 and 30 year-olds who could pass for each other.