Daniel Radcliffe
- Thread starter wat2dowit it
- Start date
B_Hickboy
Sexy Member
- Joined
- Jul 13, 2005
- Posts
- 10,056
- Media
- 0
- Likes
- 66
- Points
- 183
- Location
- That twinge in your intestines
Laws are irrelevant. Every member agreed to comply with the ToS when they joined this board.
BremerChick
1st Like
it is good pics of min0rs are not allowed, but maybe the adults can limit their over indulgence w/ sex as well...all major scriptures discourage bodily obsession and lack of modesty as unspiritual and harmful
BremerChick
1st Like
Well i was curious what the big deal was im aware of the rules. Ive seen him without a shirt before so im like umm..
notsmallmatt
Sexy Member
theres a shirtless pic of him on freaking wikipedia... and a ton of other entertainment sites..
the kid is 17 for craps sake.. not 14...
if that pic was anything less than full frontal you people seriously need to reevaluate youre "values".. maybe try and contemplate how a puritan based mindset fits with frequenting a big dick website..
i mean..... christ.. blah... i have far too many different avenues to follow on how increadibly ridiculous the knee jerking in this post is...
if on the other hand.. it WAS a dick shot... i understand... rules and such...
i just doubt it..
silly peoples!..
the kid is 17 for craps sake.. not 14...
if that pic was anything less than full frontal you people seriously need to reevaluate youre "values".. maybe try and contemplate how a puritan based mindset fits with frequenting a big dick website..
i mean..... christ.. blah... i have far too many different avenues to follow on how increadibly ridiculous the knee jerking in this post is...
if on the other hand.. it WAS a dick shot... i understand... rules and such...
i just doubt it..
silly peoples!..
notsmallmatt
Sexy Member
and id like to add... i cant stop looking at that pic on wikipedia... holy shit... i had NO IDEA.. wow... those are some good... jeans..
oop.. found a butt shot.. on some british news website... i bet theyll be going down for pedophilia any minute..
*snort*
oop.. found a butt shot.. on some british news website... i bet theyll be going down for pedophilia any minute..
*snort*
B_Hickboy
Sexy Member
- Joined
- Jul 13, 2005
- Posts
- 10,056
- Media
- 0
- Likes
- 66
- Points
- 183
- Location
- That twinge in your intestines
B_Hickboy
Sexy Member
- Joined
- Jul 13, 2005
- Posts
- 10,056
- Media
- 0
- Likes
- 66
- Points
- 183
- Location
- That twinge in your intestines
There is NOTHING puritanical about insisting that pedophilic content be kept out of this site.
My trigger finger is beginning to itch.
B_Hickboy
Sexy Member
- Joined
- Jul 13, 2005
- Posts
- 10,056
- Media
- 0
- Likes
- 66
- Points
- 183
- Location
- That twinge in your intestines
Look at it anywhere you want. Just don't post a link or discuss it here. You're talking about being sexually attracted to a naked child, and that's not a very healthy thing.
notsmallmatt
Sexy Member
17 is legal age in england.
17 is not a child.. and im only 24 for craps sake. my parents were 7 years apart in age as well.. is my mother a child to my father?
youre insane mr. moderator.... remove me if you want.. but know its not because im a pedo.. its because youre unable to handle a different perspective...
i actually remember 17.. clearly.. and i wasnt a damn child.
17 is not a child.. and im only 24 for craps sake. my parents were 7 years apart in age as well.. is my mother a child to my father?
youre insane mr. moderator.... remove me if you want.. but know its not because im a pedo.. its because youre unable to handle a different perspective...
i actually remember 17.. clearly.. and i wasnt a damn child.
B_Hickboy
Sexy Member
- Joined
- Jul 13, 2005
- Posts
- 10,056
- Media
- 0
- Likes
- 66
- Points
- 183
- Location
- That twinge in your intestines
You're banned for a day. The policy is to not allow pictures of minors or posts in which minors are sexualized. The governing legal jurisdiction for the LPSG ToS is United States laws. If you have a problem with that, join another site and don't come back to this one.
Be aware also that if you create another identity to get around this temporary ban, you will be banned permanently.
Be aware also that if you create another identity to get around this temporary ban, you will be banned permanently.
B_Think_Kink
Sexy Member
kalipygian
Expert Member
There are 3 very recent threads in which this was gone over, and over, and over:
Harry Potter's Daniel Radcliffe,
Daniel Radcliffe to appear nude,
My how you have grown, Harry Potter.
I suggest people read those instead of expecting the same questions to be answered again, and again, and again, and again.
Try using the search function before starting a new thread, now there are 4 on this subject.
Harry Potter's Daniel Radcliffe,
Daniel Radcliffe to appear nude,
My how you have grown, Harry Potter.
I suggest people read those instead of expecting the same questions to be answered again, and again, and again, and again.
Try using the search function before starting a new thread, now there are 4 on this subject.
If it smells like an R.W.P.F.E. (right-wing, pseudo-fundamentalist evangelist) looks like an R.W.P.F.E. and acts like an R.W.P.F.E., it must be an R.W.P.F.E.
Here,
Thanks for bringing this up, Kali... To save people the pain of the search function, I've created a link to a comprehensive, definitive reason behind not permitting the Radcliffe photo, courtesy of Alex8.
Please read Alex8's explanation: reference to US laws/ punitive measures that governments have taken against other websites.
In short, LPSG runs the risk of being shut down by US law over "one tiny photo". It's happened to other sites of significance. We can't risk the years of collective posts - from the intelligent and humorous to the insulting - over purient curiosity with one photo.
Thanks for bringing this up, Kali... To save people the pain of the search function, I've created a link to a comprehensive, definitive reason behind not permitting the Radcliffe photo, courtesy of Alex8.
Please read Alex8's explanation: reference to US laws/ punitive measures that governments have taken against other websites.
In short, LPSG runs the risk of being shut down by US law over "one tiny photo". It's happened to other sites of significance. We can't risk the years of collective posts - from the intelligent and humorous to the insulting - over purient curiosity with one photo.
Similar threads
Photos & Videos
Anyone have anything of Daniel Teder?
