The Lilo and Stitch complaints are absolutely ridiculous. As far as I can tell the actors cast for the part are all of Hawaiian/Asian descendants. Only because their skin tone is not dark brown, that doesn’t make them less of their race or any close to look like white people. All races come in different shades of color. I’m a very white dude and sometimes I see Asians or Latinos that are even whiter than my white ass. So seriously what are we even discussing here?They complain about racism when Ariel is black but dont complain about racism if they swap the actor a little whiter like in Lilo and Stich (they casted Hawaian actors for the roles who they thought are a little too white).
People didn't pay attention to Black Cinderella because the movie didn't make racial sense. A white father, a black mother, and an Asian child, people thought it was just an interpretation like in the theater.I've seen the trailer and the youtube comments below. You'll find a number of hilarous ones.
I won't quote them as that would be "spoilers"
The film release date is May 26, 2023.
BTW there has been a "Black Cinderella movie" without a huge backlash:
Cinderella (1997 film) - Wikipedia
I already said it. If they move Hollywood to a majority black state in the US they would have far more black people without quotas. They can even film in countries that are majority black countries and they have only black people.People didn't pay attention to Black Cinderella because the movie didn't make racial sense. A white father, a black mother, and an Asian child, people thought it was just an interpretation like in the theater.
Plus at that time there was not the toxicity of the internet and the sometimes very forced quotas.
That is not even my main problem. They inconsistency is a problem.All races come in different shades of color. I’m a very white dude and sometimes I see Asians or Latinos that are even whiter than my white ass. So seriously what are we even discussing here?
Are you for real??? The only reason they cast American actors in American movies is because the movies are “”American”” indeed. The production companies are from here and they need to be on the same page to shoot the movie, with people speaking the same language otherwise it would be a formula for disaster; beside being incredibly more expensive. Imagine if they cast all actors who spoke a different language from the director or even worse if the actors spoke all different languages from each other. Then they should hire so many translators and that would cost so much more beside the fact the costs would increase for delayed shoots for sure.. And it’s not just an American thing. Movies from all over the world work the same. Idk where you’re from, but I’m sure they make movies mostly everywhere. For example I’m sure a German movie has only people who speak German in it or a Chinese movie casts Chinese actors. Common sense. Reality. Your comment moves the needle a little bit too much on the opposite direction, which is just as bad as things used to be. Tbh I consider it a b***hurt commentBEcause most people dont speak English as their first language like me, they can only see themselves if the movies are filmed in their original language and if the movies have people from every nation in it.
I just saw the movie today it was beautiful. little boys were crying in the theatre. It was crazy how watching King Triton die made them cry out for their fathers to comfort them. I realized so much has changed in todays society. The movie is wonderful. The best live action they’ve made thus far. After a few minutes you discover. When you take the racism and creepy adult obsessions out of it you forget the film is for children. All of the kids were so happy at the end they were excited and jumping up and down. I had forgotten myself just how dazzling Disney can be. After that awful Beauty and the Beast film… I wasn’t sure but this was great Melissa McCarthy was great too. Her movements were so smooth and she scared a few of the kids too. Lol that was funny. Halle really did an excellent job as Ariel. Her voice was perfectly angelic like Jodie’s and her sisters were all so beautiful. The movie is up against a lot of hatred but so is the rest of the country. It was a great escape and it truly is wonderful.This review said it best.
In 1989, The Little Mermaid delivered the kiss of life to Disney’s floundering animation studio, ushering in a period now fondly thought of as its creative renaissance. Now its live-action remake is arriving at a time of falling profits and uncertainty about the studio’s future. Talk about synchronicity. But the differences between The Little Mermaid of yesterday and The Little Mermaid of today, as with many of these remakes, are really the differences between what the industry once was and what it now is. This is a Little Mermaid robbed of its voice – its choices ruled largely by fear, rather than the thrill of creative risk.
I'm not white and I'm not racist either. I really think the movie has a lot of low moments - it's too long, too dark, and the performances of Ariel and Eric are not up to par. Although Ariel's voice is gorgeous, and the love story between her and Eric is better than in the original movie, the original movie was not really about Ariel and Eric, but rather about Ariel and King Triton. Ariel, Ursula, Sebastian, and King Triton are the best aspects of this movie, but I don't think Ariel's performance was convincing enough to surpass even the animated version. For me, the problem with this movie lies with the director. He tends to make flat movies and is the same guy who directed the Pirates of the Caribbean movies.This entire thread is a bunch of cowardice white gay racists trying to find a polite way to say I don’t want to see a black woman play a white fictional character. Yet you have been fighting the Egyptians over CleoPatra for centuries. You want the world to see white people as the only people that matter. You mock The Hawaiian people complaining about Lilo and Stitch (who have every right to be upset) and one of you actually said Hawaiians come in multiple colors yet the film is all pale Asians that look nothing like the Pacific Islanders the characters were actually based on. you guys are a joke. You’re so oppressive for people that have been trying to compare 400 years of torture, rape and slavery to gay rights. Put down the poppers and think about others for once.
I don't think it's their best work to date. The best is Cinderella, which was produced during the Bob Iger era and was not created exclusively for Disney+. It's one of the few films where the feminist changes make sense (in addition to Cruella and Alice in Wonderland). This movie stays true to the original story like The Lion King or Aladdin, but also adds some originality to it, similar to Dumbo and Cruella, without being as bland as Mulan. The actors are well-cast, not only because of their skin color but also because their performances are outstanding, particularly the Prince, the Stepmother, and Cinderella. I remember watching this film and thinking that it was the future of live-action movies. Although The Little Mermaid is a good film, I would rank it lower than Aladdin but higher than Mulan and Beauty and the Beast.I just saw the movie today it was beautiful. little boys were crying in the theatre. It was crazy how watching King Triton die made them cry out for their fathers to comfort them. I realized so much has changed in todays society. The movie is wonderful. The best live action they’ve made thus far. After a few minutes you discover. When you take the racism and creepy adult obsessions out of it you forget the film is for children. All of the kids were so happy at the end they were excited and jumping up and down. I had forgotten myself just how dazzling Disney can be. After that awful Beauty and the Beast film… I wasn’t sure but this was great Melissa McCarthy was great too. Her movements were so smooth and she scared a few of the kids too. Lol that was funny. Halle really did an excellent job as Ariel. Her voice was perfectly angelic like Jodie’s and her sisters were all so beautiful. The movie is up against a lot of hatred but so is the rest of the country. It was a great escape and it truly is wonderful.
Does that necessarily make the film a hit? At best, it's a domestic success. I consider a film a true hit when it is both successful and good. For instance, RRR is an excellent film that meets all the criteria to be a hit - it's successful not only in India, but also internationally, the acting is great, and it's well-made.Also, the movie had a $48 million opening day box office, in the US alone. That's just a bit under Avatar2, and about the same as Guardians 3 and higher than Ant-Man 3. It's higher than Super Mario's opening day, but a bit under its first Friday. Those are the biggest films of the year, so far. So, surprisingly, it does actually have a chance. Let's face it, the movie is targeted to kids. And kids aren't generally inherently racist, unless they're taught to be.
Surprisingly, it has a 95% audience score on RottenTomatoes, though I'm sure they removed the early "reviews" based only on her skin color. The Cinemascore rating - which takes a random sampling of people who actually watched the film and can't be faked by review bombing campaigns - is an A.
So, it looks like it actually does have a chance. The kids have spoken. And as usual, they've shown us a better way.
They literally created an entire sea… it’s not the same.I don't think it's their best work to date. The best is Cinderella, which was produced during the Bob Iger era and was not created exclusively for Disney+. It's one of the few films where the feminist changes make sense (in addition to Cruella and Alice in Wonderland). This movie stays true to the original story like The Lion King or Aladdin, but also adds some originality to it, similar to Dumbo and Cruella, without being as bland as Mulan. The actors are well-cast, not only because of their skin color but also because their performances are outstanding, particularly the Prince, the Stepmother, and Cinderella. I remember watching this film and thinking that it was the future of live-action movies. Although The Little Mermaid is a good film, I would rank it lower than Aladdin but higher than Mulan and Beauty and the Beast.
I would not describe these two films as hits. Frozen is a hit, and even people who don't know the name of the singer who provides the voice of Elsa can remember her voice, performance, and presence. In France alone, I have encountered people who can recognize the voice of the singer who dubbed Elsa's character in French. A hit impact the culture.The Lion King was doing good but do people remember Beyoncé and Childish Gambino? Aladdin did well but do they still remember Will Smith? Unfortunately, they still remember the original actors and singers and the new ones are forgotten.
Cinderella was great but Cinderella was not half fish. You can’t compare that to this it isn’t nearly as complex. Just about everything was fake. The root of the issue with this film is race. Most people are upset that the character wasn’t white and no matter how hard they deflect or reword their hatred it is still there. It’s not just racism it’s prejudice as well. It’s ok to disagree but have a good life.I don't think it's their best work to date. The best is Cinderella, which was produced during the Bob Iger era and was not created exclusively for Disney+. It's one of the few films where the feminist changes make sense (in addition to Cruella and Alice in Wonderland). This movie stays true to the original story like The Lion King or Aladdin, but also adds some originality to it, similar to Dumbo and Cruella, without being as bland as Mulan. The actors are well-cast, not only because of their skin color but also because their performances are outstanding, particularly the Prince, the Stepmother, and Cinderella. I remember watching this film and thinking that it was the future of live-action movies. Although The Little Mermaid is a good film, I would rank it lower than Aladdin but higher than Mulan and Beauty and the Beast.