that's enough to judge when the delivery is AWFUL every single time.You can't judge him just for 47 seconds on screen
Froy (teen wolf)
- Thread starter 4everbilly
- Start date
-
- Tags
- #froy #froygutierrez
soul4soulgimp
Superior Member
- Joined
- Feb 1, 2020
- Posts
- 700
- Media
- 0
- Likes
- 4,159
- Points
- 288
- Location
- Cali (Valle del Cauca, Colombia)
- Sexuality
- 100% Gay, 0% Straight
- Gender
- Male
I've followed him for a couple of years, and if he acts horrible, but it's because of the kind of characters they give him (except the teen wolf one, I think he's better done than all the others), I hope one day they give him a character different and being able to see how good he can be, look at Kesha for example a while ago a lot of people said she had no talent, that she didn't know how to sing and look nowYou can't judge him just for 47 seconds on screen
I’m just gonna say this. He’s seen with Richard Madden, who use to “date” Brandon Flynn (who publicly
dated Sam smith) further more Richard got Flynn a neckless that his ex girlfriend also had. Just Google Richard madden brandon Flynn neckless.
In terms of Froy.
Froy and Richard They went to Mexico, London, etc together.
Richard def like the younger guys but I do wanna say this realistically. Why would they be hanging out but idk lol whenever I’m im doubt, I go to someone’s ig and see who they’re following. Tells you everything you need to know haha I know it’s not good to generalize but majority of straight guys just follow insta models, a couple sports teams, cbum, body builders etc. certain stuff isn’t allowed on LPSG
dated Sam smith) further more Richard got Flynn a neckless that his ex girlfriend also had. Just Google Richard madden brandon Flynn neckless.
In terms of Froy.
Froy and Richard They went to Mexico, London, etc together.
Richard def like the younger guys but I do wanna say this realistically. Why would they be hanging out but idk lol whenever I’m im doubt, I go to someone’s ig and see who they’re following. Tells you everything you need to know haha I know it’s not good to generalize but majority of straight guys just follow insta models, a couple sports teams, cbum, body builders etc. certain stuff isn’t allowed on LPSG
Attachments
Also please don’t attack me. If he’s gay, bi, experimenting whatever it doesn’t matter obviously haha I was just stating things to give people some depth
Idras Rafaello
Worshipped Member
They're fucking, no question.
So far, I think he has shown his acting skills best on Cruel Summer.
They could have done so much more with the character though. So @soul4soulgimp is right, he's just not getting very good roles overall.
They could have done so much more with the character though. So @soul4soulgimp is right, he's just not getting very good roles overall.
You can’t blame actors if they have to work with a bad writing or bad directing. Good actors that’ve went on to have good careers and have even won awards have had to deal with roles that didn’t do justice for them. Matthew Mcconaughey and Renée Zellweger both delivered terrible performances in the texas chainsaw massacre the next generation and yet they’re good actors, for example. I think Froy can deliver a good performance, but the roles that he’s been casted on don’t suit him very well.
He's not getting 'good' roles because his acting his terrible.
He's attractive af and seems like a genuinely nice likeable person. However, no studio is going to give a role that he can't handle, which is why he gets the roles he does and even then, he delivers those pretty poorly.
so i decided to watch hocus pocus 2. i was interested at first as it seemed to be an origin story for the sanderson sisters, and then froy's character comes along. dear lord he's awful in it. not only does he look much older than every else(he looks like a college student next to the rest of the cast), his line delivery is painful.
good thing he's pretty
good thing he's pretty
In a way, it's like a cycle. At what point can an actor really prove themselves unless they get good material, with a good director, to show what they're really capable of? If then they can't pull it off, with at least a few shots at it, then maybe one can say, "they're just not that good". But if they never get the chance, and all they get is crappy material, they're kind of stuck. Every actor has said you can only do so much with the material you're given, and the direction you have. And plenty of good, if not great, actors have admitted to some real duds in their earlier work. Some just have that innate talent. Others have to really work at it.
That’s what typecasting is. Most actors struggle to get their career off the ground because casting directors only chose them to play similar roles to he ones they’re known for. Anne Hathaway for example dealt with that after the Princess Diaries. She’s said that people saw her as a typical Disney girl or a typical Disney princess, although she never felt that way and it wasn’t until Devil Wears Prada that people started to see her true potential. Legendary actor Bela Lugosi could never separate himself from his portray of Universal’s Dracula even though he had a much bigger range of acting. Even the late actor Robin Williams struggled to distance himself from comedic roles, even though he was very capable of delivering dramatic performances. Actors can be good, but if they can’t get past typecasting and bad projects, their career will most likely never take off and people will say they are either bad or good for just one type of roles.
I know i named 3 actors that had or have had very prolific careers but for every actor that gets to make it out of the typecasting zone, there are like 50 that don’t get to do it. There’s this one actress from uk’s hit show skins, Kaya Scodelario, that gave a pretty good performance for 4 seasons and the very first role she got after her character was written off was a duller version of her character in skins in a movie that most people haven’t even heard of, and even being casted in a multi millionaire movie trilogy didn’t help her career and now she just participates in b class projects that don’t use her to her whole potential.
don't blame the director or script for this. HIS delivery of lines was bad
the movie was fine and the rest of the cast was fine. he stood out like a sore thumb, because his line delivery wasn't good.
can the director be to blame? yes, but only partially, because it's part of their job to tell the actor how to deliver the lines the way they want them to. but it's also on the actor to deliver the lines as they're supposed to, either by cues from the script on how they're meant to be delivered, or from being directed on how to deliver them. the script in general was also fine, so either everyone else got good writing and he got the short end of the stick, or they all got the same level of writing and the others were able to use their acting skills to make it work and he didn't.
froy was more of a small comedic relief character and maybe they didn't really bother directing him properly. his minimal screen time was mostly him being the butt of the joke for being the dumb popular kid. if the director told him to act like that, then he can't be blamed, he was following orders. but the rest of the cast did pretty well, while he's the one that stands out negatively. he was the only one in the movie, imo, who gave a bad performance.
this can negatively impact his career, because anyone that could be considering him for a role might drop him after seeing his performance in the movie
can the director be to blame? yes, but only partially, because it's part of their job to tell the actor how to deliver the lines the way they want them to. but it's also on the actor to deliver the lines as they're supposed to, either by cues from the script on how they're meant to be delivered, or from being directed on how to deliver them. the script in general was also fine, so either everyone else got good writing and he got the short end of the stick, or they all got the same level of writing and the others were able to use their acting skills to make it work and he didn't.
froy was more of a small comedic relief character and maybe they didn't really bother directing him properly. his minimal screen time was mostly him being the butt of the joke for being the dumb popular kid. if the director told him to act like that, then he can't be blamed, he was following orders. but the rest of the cast did pretty well, while he's the one that stands out negatively. he was the only one in the movie, imo, who gave a bad performance.
this can negatively impact his career, because anyone that could be considering him for a role might drop him after seeing his performance in the movie
Tbh I feel bad for agreeing to this but that’s exactly what I was thinking when I saw his acting on Hocus Pocus …..frankly his acting was a lot better in teen wolf and cruel summer.
The problem is the comedic role he was given, he doesn’t know how to execute those well, I dont think that’s where his talent shines. He does a lot better in serious roles like Cruel Summer
After having now watched his scenes, honestly, I think we're being way too hard on him. Yes, he plays the dumb jock (again), but more for comic relief, and considering the character archetype, I think he pulled it off just fine. Really. Nothing to write home about, but certainly not bad to the point where it would negatively impact his career overall. (And for the record, the 3 young girls were absolutely nothing to write home about either.)
That said, I do think he does better with angsty, emo roles (not surprisingly) like Jamie in Cruel Summer, and Nolan in Teen Wolf, so far.
That said, I do think he does better with angsty, emo roles (not surprisingly) like Jamie in Cruel Summer, and Nolan in Teen Wolf, so far.
