Hayden Greene

[samuelviana700]

A guy who has not shown more than a basic tease level is going to star showing hole because he suddenly realizes he is gay? That is some powerful wishful thinking

It has nothing to do with sexual labels but with money, sexuality is so fickle so you never know lol

 

[psy89]

He's been traveling all summer (Greece, Denver, NYC to name a few) and doesn't have a job outside of going to the gym and posting on social media. He's already making plenty of money in that game without needing to increase his profit.

"He's not straight" and "he's gonna go full nude" have been repeated in this thread ad nauseam—two things there is no evidence for, besides horny gays wanting them to be true and therefore becoming convinced that they are.

 

[JJREAGAN]

H

He's been traveling all summer (Greece, Denver, NYC to name a few) and doesn't have a job outside of going to the gym and posting on social media. He's already making plenty of money in that game without needing to increase his profit.

"He's not straight" and "he's gonna go full nude" have been repeated in this thread ad nauseam—two things there is no evidence for, besides horny gays wanting them to be true and therefore becoming convinced that they a

He's been traveling all summer (Greece, Denver, NYC to name a few) and doesn't have a job outside of going to the gym and posting on social media. He's already making plenty of money in that game without needing to increase his profit.

"He's not straight" and "he's gonna go full nude" have been repeated in this thread ad nauseam—two things there is no evidence for, besides horny gays wanting them to be true and therefore becoming convinced that they are.

He’s dating a girl and she went with him abroad. He posted a pic of them on a scooter in Greece.

 

[samuelviana700]

He's been traveling all summer (Greece, Denver, NYC to name a few) and doesn't have a job outside of going to the gym and posting on social media. He's already making plenty of money in that game without needing to increase his profit.

"He's not straight" and "he's gonna go full nude" have been repeated in this thread ad nauseam—two things there is no evidence for, besides horny gays wanting them to be true and therefore becoming convinced that they are.

I know but he already sells soft nudes to guys who want to buy privately, it's a start lol

 

[Waterbewet]

I don't believe he's 100% straight. If one day he wants to increase his profit, he'll have to make concessions to take more explicit pictures showing his hole.

I think he is religiously straight. You can just tell

 

[samuelviana700]

I think he is religiously straight. You can just tell

No, it's not, I think only the Kinsey scale can explain it lol

 

[Waterbewet]

No, it's not, I think only the Kinsey scale can explain it lol

1. I’m pretty sure he identifies as a guy so idk why we’re referring to HIM as “it’s”

2. The Kinsey scale is not a staple measurement of ascertaining ones “straightness” or lack there of so, therefore, your snuck premises of asserting a metric as widely accepted is not applicable especially when you don’t make a case for its relevance in this context.

3. Even if I were to give credence to the Kinsey scale, in this context, you nor the other guy has shown proof or a comprehensive explanation that would give you the illusion, or should I say delusion, that he is remotely “gay enough” to send his dick pics to men or post largely for his male audience despite EXUDING copious amounts of vast religious heterosexual undertones.

with that I digress

 

[samuelviana700]

1. I’m pretty sure he identifies as a guy so idk why we’re referring to HIM as “it’s”

2. The Kinsey scale is not a staple measurement of ascertaining ones “straightness” or lack there of so, therefore, your snuck premises of asserting a metric as widely accepted is not applicable especially when you don’t make a case for its relevance in this context.

3. Even if I were to give credence to the Kinsey scale, in this context, you nor the other guy has shown proof or a comprehensive explanation that would give you the illusion, or should I say delusion, that he is remotely “gay enough” to send his dick pics to men or post largely for his male audience despite EXUDING copious amounts of vast religious heterosexual undertones.

with that I digress

But Kinsey Scale gives the best answer for those who don't know how to say with the right words what they feel at certain times. It details small behaviors and feelings on a mathematical scale of sexuality that removes many doubts but one thing is certain, Hayden has never spoken about how he identifies, so any statement here is nothing more than mere theory. Sexuality is a spectrum, science, nothing more, in the gay porn industry, it's full of straight porn actors who have gay sex for money and I know hundreds where I live who do the same.

 

[TopsOnBottom]

But Kinsey Scale gives the best answer for those who don't know how to say with the right words what they feel at certain times. It details small behaviors and feelings on a mathematical scale of sexuality that removes many doubts but one thing is certain, Hayden has never spoken about how he identifies, so any statement here is nothing more than mere theory. Sexuality is a spectrum, science, nothing more, in the gay porn industry, it's full of straight porn actors who have gay sex for money and I know hundreds where I live who do the same.

Ok hundreds? I'm going to need proof in the form of pics, numbers (or social media) and rates

 

[deleted21475781]

What the hell does religiously straight mean? Lol.

 

[samuelviana700]

So here we go again with the snuck premises:

-he clearly identifies as a heterosexual male which he strictly states in the video below

-even if he didn’t say such, you calling him an IT is not proper way to direct your statement(s) towards someone you don’t know how to identify. You can refer to them as they/them or call him by his name.

-you have proven, yet again, your lack in awareness pertaining to this individual which continues to highlight the lack in validity any of your arguments have.

-it is not objectively substantiated that sexuality is on a spectrum. Nor is sexuality contingent on the spectrum of the Kenzie Scale. I for one support the notion that sexuality does not exist. Everyone has the ability to love one another or engage sexual with each other, however, because of modern social constructs forcing our perspectives, we see more things like “toxic masculinity” (I hate that term makes me sound like a SJW). I feel like cavemen were having sex with everyone and everything and I feel like if babies were raised in a vacuum, they would grow up and have similar experiences to that of those cavemen. I do give credence to the possibility that some people potentially being born gay/straight but, I think that is such a minority.

-Also just because people have gay sex for money doesn’t make them any more/less straight on or off your unsubstantiated scale

I didn't say he's gay or bi, what I meant is that the fact that he's straight doesn't change anything about opening himself up to new experiences someday, like I said, it's all a matter of choice and his own and yes, sexuality is still a mystery. I still go by the Kinsey Scale

 

[TopsOnBottom]

I didn't say he's gay or bi, what I meant is that the fact that he's straight doesn't change anything about opening himself up to new experiences someday, like I said, it's all a matter of choice and his own and yes, sexuality is still a mystery. I still go by the Kinsey Scale

I go by the Lindsay scale, the Lindsay Lohan scale of whether or not i would watch someone do a sex tape with Lindsay Lohan. And he is on that scale of Yes!! I would watch a sex tape with him in it and I would portray Lindsay Lohan

 

[patcw]

Footage of me reading this thread

View attachment 103971581

Lol yes

 

[patcw]

I’m considering getting his of for just like a month do y’all recommend it or nah

 

[creedore]

I’m considering getting his of for just like a month do y’all recommend it or nah

Not at all. I’ve subscribed before and it’s really not worth the money

 

[TopsOnBottom]

I’m considering getting his of for just like a month do y’all recommend it or nah

Ask him how much for a solo performance video and let us kno

 

[wwwnyc80]

I’m considering getting his of for just like a month do y’all recommend it or nah

I’ve subscribed before, the pics are a little more revealing than IG, but not much. There’s quite a few shots where you can see the outline of his head through his underwear, vids of him flexing his cock in his underwear, underwear down to expose the very top of his shaft, or at most about half of his ass. (Not necessarily all in the same photo)

if they haven’t been taken down, you find examples in this thread. There’s nothing more revealing on OF. if you’re fine with that, and won’t come here to bitch about how horrible it is, then go for it. Just be aware that’s all there is.

 

[JJREAGAN]

I’ve subscribed before, the pics are a little more revealing than IG, but not much. There’s quite a few shots where you can see the outline of his head through his underwear, vids of him flexing his cock in his underwear, underwear down to expose the very top of his shaft, or at most about half of his ass. (Not necessarily all in the same photo)

if they haven’t been taken down, you find examples in this thread. There’s nothing more revealing on OF. if you’re fine with that, and won’t come here to bitch about how horrible it is, then go for it. Just be aware that’s all there is.

Good review

 

[jerker96]

I’m liking the higher quality pics he is putting on his “Fam” thread

 

[Zhugezen]

Anyone have updates on his grwm for bed ppv? 30 sec for $13? Really?