So here we go again with the snuck premises:
-he clearly identifies as a heterosexual male which he strictly states in the video below
-even if he didn’t say such, you calling him an IT is not proper way to direct your statement(s) towards someone you don’t know how to identify. You can refer to them as they/them or call him by his name.
-you have proven, yet again, your lack in awareness pertaining to this individual which continues to highlight the lack in validity any of your arguments have.
-it is not objectively substantiated that sexuality is on a pectrum. Nor is sexuality contingent on the spectrum of the Kenzie Scale. I for one support the notion that sexuality does not exist. Everyone has the ability to love one another or engage sexual with each other, however, because of modern social constructs forcing our perspectives, we see more things like “toxic masculinity” (I hate that term makes me sound like a SJW). I feel like cavemen were having sex with everyone and everything and I feel like if babies were raised in a vacuum, they would grow up and have similar experiences to that of those cavemen. I do give credence to the possibility that some people potentially being born gay/straight but, I think that is such a minority.
-Also just because people have gay sex for money doesn’t make them any more/less straight on or off your unsubstantiated scale
