Hopefully the definitive mandingo length analysis

[goldzilla]

• Not sure who my banned friend is... RFJ perhaps oh, no - he's always on my back over multiple threads, so can't be...
• Multi thread name-calling is trolling.
• The majority of measurements have been contributed by sdp - not you.
• Your primary contribution so far have been unsubstantiated claims and pictures not fit for the purpose of the thread stated by the OP - you so far have been spearheading an attempt to derail the work done by sdp instead of making useful contributions.

• You have indeed posted countless pictures, however none of them shows a measurement. I can spam this thread with pictures of Mandingo as well, claiming he's 6' tall. Claiming something over and over doesn't make it the truth. It only derails.
• Barbie Doll - hope he paid royalties
• Various users - hurray
• No idea who MrHuge1n is. Has he compared his cock with Mandingo?

• I honestly believe Mandingo is an inch longer and quite a bit thicker than Steve Holmes. However I seriously doubt Steve Holmes is 7.5" to be honest. So again we disagree - I believe Mandingo is at least an inch longer.

Wrong. Check the measured pornstars thread. The majority of hard work is done by me. Many of the recent measurements are found by me and posted in, many of which have not been seen before or cited on this forum. Sdp is not doing ruler or tape measurements, or searching for them, he doing subjective hand measurements of Mandingo. Apart from the banned guy, Nehoo, yourself and Stevenson no other user on this forum takes the 8.7 claim for Mandingo seriously. Everyone on these forums know you are the downplayers on this board. You are a little club

There are users on this forum that are over 8.7 inches with meausements (MrHuge1, Mr. Snufalufagus, Quercusone, runner9 and bigdicknickb), all of them would tell you Mandingo is slightly longer than themselves.

Steve Holmes is 7.5 inches erect, I have spoken to him about this, why would he lie? Someone posted he was 12 inches long and he found the idea funny and came clean and admitted to being 7.5".

Mandingo is 9.5-10 inches erect... get over it. Dick exists over 8.7 inches long. Now let's just move on now and never talk to each other again. Take care.

Lex, measuring from side does not make you 8.75, its top measurement who count.

This has been explained by user phenomenon many times. It comes to 9 inches with a margin of 0.25 possible error, so he is 8.75 erect and that was Lex in his prime. Mandingo appears in several early videos with Lex and they are side by side and Mandingo is one inch longer... this has already been cited in many photos. Mandingo is longer than Lex, so how could Mandingo be 8.7 inches? Impossible.

 

[pepsiversuscoke]

Wrong. Check the measured pornstars thread. The majority of hard work is done by me. Many of the recent measurements are found by me and posted in, many of which have not been seen before or cited on this forum. Sdp is not doing ruler or tape measurements, or searching for them, he doing subjective hand measurements of Mandingo. Apart from the banned guy, Nehoo, yourself and Stevenson no other user on this forum takes the 8.7 claim for Mandingo seriously. Everyone on these forums know you are the downplayers on this board. You are a little club

There are users on this forum that are over 8.7 inches with meausements (MrHuge1, Mr. Snufalufagus, Quercusone, runner9 and bigdicknickb), all of them would tell you Mandingo is slightly longer than themselves.

Steve Holmes is 7.5 inches erect, I have spoken to him about this, why would he lie? Someone posted he was 12 inches long and he found the idea funny and came clean and admitted to being 7.5".

Mandingo is 9.5-10 inches erect... get over it. Dick exists over 8.7 inches long. Now let's just move on now and never talk to each other again. Take care.



This has been explained by user phenomenon many times. It comes to 9 inches with a margin of 0.25 possible error, so he is 8.75 erect and that was Lex in his prime. Mandingo appears in several early videos with Lex and they are side by side and Mandingo is one inch longer... this has already been cited in many photos. Mandingo is longer than Lex, so how could Mandingo be 8.7 inches? Impossible.

Same stinky bull crap time and time and time again.

Someone get this guy a Ritalin or Prozac.

 

[pepsiversuscoke]

I love how he has the arrogance to speak for everyone too...

 

[goldzilla]

I honestly believe Mandingo is an inch longer and quite a bit thicker than Steve Holmes. However I seriously doubt Steve Holmes is 7.5" to be honest. So again we disagree - I believe Mandingo is at least an inch longer.

Clearly more than 1 inch longer:

Vs

Still believe Mandingo is 8.7" ?

 

[goldzilla]

Same stinky bull crap time and time and time again.

Someone get this guy a Ritalin or Prozac.

Mandingo is 9.5-10 inches... get over it pal Life goes on.

 

[pepsiversuscoke]

You're right goldzilla, you are so right. You're trolling has convinced everyone. Everyone else here is wrong, and it's your world and we're all just living in it.

Is that what you wanted to hear? Will you leave now?

 

[dickbutt69]

Clearly more than 1 inch longer:

View attachment 596777

View attachment 596778

Vs

View attachment 596780

View attachment 596784


Still believe Mandingo is 8.7" ?

Isn't Riley Reid super short? This is what I'm talking about, using tiny standards of reference to artificially enlarge the members. The second photo isn't accurate, she isn't grasping the penis as she is in the first image. The two aren't both naked, and the angles are all bonkers. You can't get a measurement from this, this isn't a valid argument. You can't take what you want away from an obtuse image; doing so is proof that you are trying to conflate your own arbitrary narrative with the truth. I can easily say that he is 9+/- 'x' inches from the image, but that gets us nowhere. I haven't set forth a methodology, I haven't provided more evidence replicating my results. There's a reason they don't want accurate measurements, it's to fool people into believing that the guys have 10+ inch penises. That just doesn't work like that. Most average pornstars are 6-7, bigger ones are 7-8, and the really big ones are 8-9. Above 9 is very rare, there might be a few around, but it isn't going to be on the upper ends of 9.
It's also telling when you are not able to directly provide evidence of a length upfront. There is no need to compare other people's lengths, the standard of reference should be a ruler: only then will you get a legitimate length. There will be no conjecture of camera angles to control for when you just go straight to measuring the penis upfront. sdp does this with a pixel measurement, and that is much more superior to just finding two images. There is a big margin of error, you are literally eyeballing it. Until you can provide direct proof with a reliable methodology/standard of reference getting right into the legitimate measurements, you can't make claims of size, just as I can't say the length is 9 +/- 'x' inches.

 

[goldzilla]

Isn't Riley Reid super short? This is what I'm talking about, using tiny standards of reference to artificially enlarge the members. The second photo isn't accurate, she isn't grasping the penis as she is in the first image. The two aren't both naked, and the angles are all bonkers. You can't get a measurement from this, this isn't a valid argument. You can't take what you want away from an obtuse image; doing so is proof that you are trying to conflate your own arbitrary narrative with the truth. I can easily say that he is 9+/- 'x' inches from the image, but that gets us nowhere. I haven't set forth a methodology, I haven't provided more evidence replicating my results. There's a reason they don't want accurate measurements, it's to fool people into believing that the guys have 10+ inch penises. That just doesn't work like that. Most average pornstars are 6-7, bigger ones are 7-8, and the really big ones are 8-9. Above 9 is very rare, there might be a few around, but it isn't going to be on the upper ends of 9.
It's also telling when you are not able to directly provide evidence of a length upfront. There is no need to compare other people's lengths, the standard of reference should be a ruler: only then will you get a legitimate length. There will be no conjecture of camera angles to control for when you just go straight to measuring the penis upfront. sdp does this with a pixel measurement, and that is much more superior to just finding two images. There is a big margin of error, you are literally eyeballing it. Until you can provide direct proof with a reliable methodology/standard of reference getting right into the legitimate measurements, you can't make claims of size, just as I can't say the length is 9 +/- 'x' inches.

From a solid standing position a female porn actress (Riley Reid) can get 3 and half hands on Mandingo's erect dick, you can work this out from the above photographs. Her hands are not even joined together there either, there is a small gap there between her hands. You can see that even with two hands there is still loads of room left on his shaft. How can he possibly be 8.7 inches long? How can all this add up to 8.7 inches? Lol. That is over 3 hands. Average female hand width is 2.91 inches.

Stand up, pull out a 12 inch wooden ruler put and 3 solid hands on it. Does not equal 8.7 inches!!

He has a solid 9.5-10 inch penis on a good day, why do you want to rob him of this inch or so? It is hilarious this 8.7 claim which doesn't have a single scientific piece of evidence to support it only sdp's subjective hand analysis. It amazes me how far people want to downplay pornstars to make themselves feel better. You guys are no different than the fantasy players who exaggerate porn dick sizes. This is fundamentalism, but thank you for an interesting debate

 

[phenomenon]

For the umpteenth time this is the easiest way to break this down: Lex was measured just about dead-on to be 9 inches in his prime. At no point has Mandingo ever appeared smaller than Lex in his prime. Mandingo has always been unmistakably larger than Lex. Thus Mandingo is > 9"

HOW HARD IS THIS TO COMPREHEND?

Dickbutt in your own words "most of the big pornstars are around 8-9 inches, most at around 8.5"

Mandingo is clearly, demonstrably not the same as most big pornstars. He's bigger by at least half an inch. You have to cite the biggest dicks in the entire industry to even make comparable arguments.

Goldzilla in 1 post has made a more useful contribution toward the topic than sdp has all year long, because Goldzilla has used a consistent frame of reference, that is to say Riley Reid.

Every instance in which I've seen the same female in a scene with other big, well hung pornstars, who is also in a scene with Mandingo, the other dick looks smaller. Mandingo's dick requires more than 3 hands in almost every single instance. The average female hand width is 2.9 inches.

3 x 2.9 = 8.7.
Then you have to add the remainder, which usually includes most if not all of the head of his dick. That's at least half an inch. Depending on the female's hand size, you're typically seeing 3 hand widths + half and inch to 1 inch remaining.

 

[pepsiversuscoke]

From a solid standing position a female porn actress (Riley Reid) can get 3 and half hands on Mandingo's erect dick, you can work this out from the above photographs. Her hands are not even joined together there either, there is a small gap there between her hands. You can see that even with two hands there is still loads of room left on his shaft. How can he possibly be 8.7 inches long? How can all this add up to 8.7 inches? Lol. That is over 3 hands. Average female hand width is 2.91 inches.

Stand up, pull out a 12 inch wooden ruler put and 3 solid hands on it. Does not equal 8.7 inches!!

He has a solid 9.5-10 inch penis on a good day, why do you want to rob him of this inch or so? It is hilarious this 8.7 claim which doesn't have a single scientific piece of evidence to support it only sdp's subjective hand analysis. It amazes me how far people want to downplay pornstars to make themselves feel better. You guys are no different than the fantasy players who exaggerate porn dick sizes. This is fundamentalism, but thank you for an interesting debate

For the umpteenth time this is the easiest way to break this down: Lex was measured just about dead-on to be 9 inches in his prime. At no point has Mandingo ever appeared smaller than Lex in his prime. Mandingo has always been unmistakably larger than Lex. Thus Mandingo is > 9"

HOW HARD IS THIS TO COMPREHEND?

Dickbutt in your own words "most of the big pornstars are around 8-9 inches, most at around 8.5"

Mandingo is clearly, demonstrably not the same as most big pornstars. He's bigger by at least half an inch. You have to cite the biggest dicks in the entire industry to even make comparable arguments.

Goldzilla in 1 post has made a more useful contribution toward the topic than sdp has all year long, because Goldzilla has used a consistent frame of reference, that is to say Riley Reid.

Every instance in which I've seen the same female in a scene with other big, well hung pornstars, who is also in a scene with Mandingo, the other dick looks smaller. Mandingo's dick requires more than 3 hands in almost every single instance. The average female hand width is 2.9 inches.

3 x 2.9 = 8.7.
Then you have to add the remainder, which usually includes most if not all of the head of his dick. That's at least half an inch. Depending on the female's hand size, you're typically seeing 3 hand widths + half and inch to 1 inch remaining.

Ah, the dynamic duo...the two stooges....if only they could manufacture anything the least bit accurate.

 

[Ocine]

This has been explained by user phenomenon many times. It comes to 9 inches with a margin of 0.25 possible error, so he is 8.75 erect and that was Lex in his prime. Mandingo appears in several early videos with Lex and they are side by side and Mandingo is one inch longer... this has already been cited in many photos. Mandingo is longer than Lex, so how could Mandingo be 8.7 inches? Impossible.

This right ? :

http://pornmeasurements.tumblr.com/image/103358690097

You can cleary see that the tape dont touch his dick and there a little triangle between thre start of the tape and his dick ? we cant see where it start but it end at a bit more than 9

I did a very fast test :

here a measure from top :

https://www.lpsg.com/gallery/photos/1121705/

~7.2 "

and here some side measurements like Lex :

https://www.lpsg.com/gallery/photos/1121707/

https://www.lpsg.com/gallery/photos/1121706/

I can reach 8.5 to 9 depends how I angle the ruler


So see it took me 5 min to lie on my measurements, and Im alone I dont have a cameraman for help me

I did a top measurements, so tis easier for you to see how I cheat with the rule

I didnt want to lost my time doing that, but if I took the time and did a side measurement like Lex I could totaly lure you and make you beleive that 7.2 things was 9


And all the other user you named higher as being 9+ and still shorter than Mandingo use some tricks like I just used now, (penis downard, ruler not straight and angling on a side for make a perception etc...)

Now I stop to lose my time with you... and flood with off thread

 

[pepsiversuscoke]

This right ? :

http://pornmeasurements.tumblr.com/image/103358690097

You can cleary see that the tape dont touch his dick and there a little triangle between thre start of the tape and his dick ? we cant see where it start but it end at a bit more than 9

I did a very fast test :

here a measure from top :

https://www.lpsg.com/gallery/photos/1121705/

~7.2 "

and here some side measurements like Lex :

https://www.lpsg.com/gallery/photos/1121707/

https://www.lpsg.com/gallery/photos/1121706/

I can reach 8.5 to 9 depends how I angle the ruler


So see it took me 5 min to lie on my measurements, and Im alone I dont have a cameraman for help me

I did a top measurements, so tis easier for you to see how I cheat with the rule

I didnt want to lost my time doing that, but if I took the time and did a side measurement like Lex I could totaly lure you and make you beleive that 7.2 things was 9


And all the other user you named higher as being 9+ and still shorter than Mandingo use some tricks like I just used now, (penis downard, ruler not straight and angling on a side for make a perception etc...)

Now I stop to lose my time with you... and flood with off thread

It's arguably a waste of time to attempt to reason with them. They'll insist Lexington Steele was "measured" at 8.5"+ when the tape isn't on the same plane as the dick, is farther away from the lens than the dick, and isn't positioned dorsal. This pic was posted by sdp and it completely shows how both that Steele measurement (and the "Barbie doll" pic which every 'tard seems to love) are both horrendously inaccurate and all but useless.

But don't try to reason with these two dorks...they're void of any of it.

 

[dickbutt69]

From a solid standing position a female porn actress (Riley Reid) can get 3 and half hands on Mandingo's erect dick, you can work this out from the above photographs. Her hands are not even joined together there either, there is a small gap there between her hands. You can see that even with two hands there is still loads of room left on his shaft. How can he possibly be 8.7 inches long? How can all this add up to 8.7 inches? Lol. That is over 3 hands. Average female hand width is 2.91 inches.

Stand up, pull out a 12 inch wooden ruler put and 3 solid hands on it. Does not equal 8.7 inches!!

He has a solid 9.5-10 inch penis on a good day, why do you want to rob him of this inch or so? It is hilarious this 8.7 claim which doesn't have a single scientific piece of evidence to support it only sdp's subjective hand analysis. It amazes me how far people want to downplay pornstars to make themselves feel better. You guys are no different than the fantasy players who exaggerate porn dick sizes. This is fundamentalism, but thank you for an interesting debate

Buddy, you are making it clear to the world that you are literally eye-balling it. That is not an accurate measurement. I will trust sdp because he sets forth his methods and replicates his results. The onus is now on your shoulders, and "eye-balling" it is not an argument, just as coming to a conclusion about the speed of a car simply because you saw one go really fast the other day isn't an argument. Which do you think is more accurate: the size of a hand or the size of a pixel? To elaborate, let me put forth another question. What is the best tool to use in order to measure a relatively average (relative to your body) object: an aluminum can or a piano? You know both objects do not change dimensions, but which is superior? The answer is the aluminum can, because it is a smaller unit of measurement. It can be more accurate. The length of the object can be 6 cans long, as opposed to one-sixteenth the length of a piano. When considering our situation, we cannot get to a one-sixteenth length (if we could, we would just use a ruler), so the pixel measurement is superior over the eye-balling hand measurement.
Then you claim that sdp's measurement is subjective, which means that he manipulated the results in order to make it seem smaller than it is. Can you prove how the measurements are inaccurate? Can you put forth a more accurate method of measurement so as to disprove his results? That is how you disprove something, put forth better evidence and make a better case/rebuttal. I'm giving you the benefit of the doubt and assuming you have this evidence, so I will wait until you provide it.

 

[steveo188]

Ummm there are 30 pages of messages about how big one guy's dick is?

 

[dickbutt69]

For the umpteenth time this is the easiest way to break this down: Lex was measured just about dead-on to be 9 inches in his prime. At no point has Mandingo ever appeared smaller than Lex in his prime. Mandingo has always been unmistakably larger than Lex. Thus Mandingo is > 9"

HOW HARD IS THIS TO COMPREHEND?

Dickbutt in your own words "most of the big pornstars are around 8-9 inches, most at around 8.5"

Mandingo is clearly, demonstrably not the same as most big pornstars. He's bigger by at least half an inch. You have to cite the biggest dicks in the entire industry to even make comparable arguments.

Goldzilla in 1 post has made a more useful contribution toward the topic than sdp has all year long, because Goldzilla has used a consistent frame of reference, that is to say Riley Reid.

Every instance in which I've seen the same female in a scene with other big, well hung pornstars, who is also in a scene with Mandingo, the other dick looks smaller. Mandingo's dick requires more than 3 hands in almost every single instance. The average female hand width is 2.9 inches.

3 x 2.9 = 8.7.
Then you have to add the remainder, which usually includes most if not all of the head of his dick. That's at least half an inch. Depending on the female's hand size, you're typically seeing 3 hand widths + half and inch to 1 inch remaining.

Why do you rely on comparison as opposed to outright measurements of the case-in-point? If the result is SO obvious and overt, why not just prove the length from the case-in-point, as opposed to resorting to other people? That is the equivalent of measuring a length with your hand and then moving over to the object you wish to compare it to while trying to hold your hand still (so as to maintain the original measurement). It isn't very accurate, why not just measure the object-in-question upfront? Goldzilla's frame-of-reference resorts to the same reasoning. If you claim the truth is on your side, just prove it with the measurement as it is. sdp did not compare any other images to anything else, he uses pixels, which are a much smaller unit (I have discussed why smaller units are superior measuring tools in these contexts), to make his claims, as opposed to "hands". Comparatively speaking, the arguments don't match up, sdp has a better claim. Unless you can prove him wrong by making more accurate measurements. I'd put the object at 9 or so inches, I don't really care about a half an inch, but others do and have made their cases, which I find to be valid. You don't use your palm's length to measure an object, you use a ruler. Pixels are the digital equivalent.

 

[pepsiversuscoke]

Buddy, you are making it clear to the world that you are literally eye-balling it. That is not an accurate measurement. I will trust sdp because he sets forth his methods and replicates his results. The onus is now on your shoulders, and "eye-balling" it is not an argument, just as coming to a conclusion about the speed of a car simply because you saw one go really fast the other day isn't an argument. Which do you think is more accurate: the size of a hand or the size of a pixel? To elaborate, let me put forth another question. What is the best tool to use in order to measure a relatively average (relative to your body) object: an aluminum can or a piano? You know both objects do not change dimensions, but which is superior? The answer is the aluminum can, because it is a smaller unit of measurement. It can be more accurate. The length of the object can be 6 cans long, as opposed to one-sixteenth the length of a piano. When considering our situation, we cannot get to a one-sixteenth length (if we could, we would just use a ruler), so the pixel measurement is superior over the eye-balling hand measurement.
Then you claim that sdp's measurement is subjective, which means that he manipulated the results in order to make it seem smaller than it is. Can you prove how the measurements are inaccurate? Can you put forth a more accurate method of measurement so as to disprove his results? That is how you disprove something, put forth better evidence and make a better case/rebuttal. I'm giving you the benefit of the doubt and assuming you have this evidence, so I will wait until you provide it.

Why do you rely on comparison as opposed to outright measurements of the case-in-point? If the result is SO obvious and overt, why not just prove the length from the case-in-point, as opposed to resorting to other people? That is the equivalent of measuring a length with your hand and then moving over to the object you wish to compare it to while trying to hold your hand still (so as to maintain the original measurement). It isn't very accurate, why not just measure the object-in-question upfront? Goldzilla's frame-of-reference resorts to the same reasoning. If you claim the truth is on your side, just prove it with the measurement as it is. sdp did not compare any other images to anything else, he uses pixels, which are a much smaller unit (I have discussed why smaller units are superior measuring tools in these contexts), to make his claims, as opposed to "hands". Comparatively speaking, the arguments don't match up, sdp has a better claim. Unless you can prove him wrong by making more accurate measurements. I'd put the object at 9 or so inches, I don't really care about a half an inch, but others do and have made their cases, which I find to be valid. You don't use your palm's length to measure an object, you use a ruler. Pixels are the digital equivalent.

Great posts. Clear, concise and articulated very well. But I can't help but think your way of reasoning might "fly over" some people's heads...

 

[sdp]

he doing subjective hand measurements of Mandingo.

Care to elaborate on what's subjective about my methodology?

There are users on this forum that are over 8.7 inches with meausements (MrHuge1, Mr. Snufalufagus, Quercusone, runner9 and bigdicknickb)

None of them have legit NBP measured pics, not even close.

Steve Holmes is 7.5 inches erect

lol no way.

Average female hand width is 2.91 inches.

The average female hand width is 2.9 inches.

For the billionth time, the average female hand breadth is 2.91", see post #1. You never get to see the full hand breadth at the correct angle along the cock, so you can't just use that figure as is. That's the whole point of this thread.

-----------------------------

Pic 184a

My hand: 56mm
Her hand: 45.6mm, 72px
Penis: 337px, 213.4mm (8.40")

Average of results so far: 8.72"

 

[23skadoo]

Great us average guys are gonna now be looking at our ladies' hand clinched around our johnsons and instead of enjoying it, we will be thinking...2.91 inches...and how much more is showing after that...thnx a lot!

 

[23skadoo]

Thnx....now when my lady has my cock in her hand, instead of enjoying...I will be thinking how much more shaft is visible after 2.91 inches...thnx a lot....a good hand job ruined

 

[23skadoo]

Got me so upset, I posted twice...ha...actually, thought first didn't go thru