How common are 11 inch cocks?

[ItsAll4Kim]

There was a shadow in MrHuge's old measurement photograph. It definitely existed. But the shadow is not proof the measurement was faked. I personally inverted that picture and it had not been photo-shopped. There are many reasons how a shadow can end up on a photograph, it does not automatically equate to fraud.

We all know it wasn't about the shadows created by the hand, or the ruler, or the leg. It was about the lack of a shadow where the penis was, which happened to be between the hand and the ruler. You know this, and neither you nor definitely MrShadow1n can give even a remotely plausible explanation for what is an impossibility.

It does automatically equate to fraud. It was enough of a fraud that he couldn't even stammer out the slightest explanation.

And inverting the picture isn't remotely a firm test of validity.

 

[Snakebyte]

There was a shadow in MrHuge's old measurement photograph. It definitely existed. But the shadow is not proof the measurement was faked. I personally inverted that picture and it had not been photo-shopped. There are many reasons how a shadow can end up on a photograph, it does not automatically equate to fraud.

Oh my gosh, when will you learn that inverting a pic neither is part of a digital image forensic analysis nor will it show any evidence of photoshop? There was absolutely no logical explanation for the missing shadow. None. Zero.

Shadow is a proven fraud. No clue why you still defend him.

where? evidence? wait you have none.

Unfortunately the thread seems to be deleted. But everyone who read it back then knows what you wrote. There is no denying that you are a racist. No matter what you say, as long as you think black men shouldn't date white women you are exactly that: a racist.

 

[goldzilla]

Oh my gosh, when will you learn that inverting a pic neither is part of a digital image forensic analysis nor will it show any evidence of photoshop? There was absolutely no logical explanation for the missing shadow. None. Zero.

Shadow is a proven fraud. No clue why you still defend him.

Inverting an image is an easy way to reveal evidences of photo-shopped images. You can see what pixels have been edited. I am not claiming it is part of any forensic analysis but it is a good method of spotting fakes or getting a closer look at things.

 

[goldzilla]

Shadow is a proven fraud. No clue why you still defend him.

He has demonstrated to my satisfaction he is the longest measured dick on LPSG currently. He has done on top measurements with a tape. None of those are fake. Are you saying every measurement in his gallery is fake?

 

[goldzilla]

You know this, and neither you nor definitely MrShadow1n can give even a remotely plausible explanation for what is an impossibility.

It does automatically equate to fraud. It was enough of a fraud that he couldn't even stammer out the slightest explanation.

Can you explain why a lack of shadow where his penis was automatically equals a fake? Under what rule?

You were not in the room with him, you do not know the light conditions or light source/s that were in the room when he took the photo. Why should we expect a shadow under his penis ?? Just because there may not have been a shadow on part of his penis does not mean it was fake.

There are hundreds of photographs of penis measurements, there has to be a shadow underneath every one does there? I think not. Your are not taking into account the light condition diversity of all photographs.

 

[goldzilla]

No matter what you say, as long as you think black men shouldn't date white women you are exactly that: a racist.

No it is not racist.

Dr. Umar Johnson shares my views on this subject and he is black. Neither of us are racist.

 

[Snakebyte]

Inverting an image is an easy way to reveal evidences of photo-shopped images. You can see what pixels have been edited. I am not claiming it is part of any forensic analysis but it is a good method of spotting fakes or getting a closer look at things.

Inverting an image will show you absolutely nothing. All it does is change the color of every pixel to its complementary color. It doesn't reveal any new details.
But go on, prove me wrong. What was changed in that picture?

He has demonstrated to my satisfaction he is the longest measured dick on LPSG currently. He has done on top measurements with a tape. None of those are fake. Are you saying every measurement in his gallery is fake?

Show me one single legit measurement where he doesn't try to cheat.

Can you explain why a lack of shadow where his penis was automatically equals a fake? Under what rule?

You were not in the room with him, you do not know the light conditions or light source/s that were in the room when he took the photo. Why should we expect a shadow under his penis ?? Just because there may not have been a shadow on part of his penis does not mean it was fake.

There are hundreds of photographs of penis measurements, there has to be a shadow underneath every one does there? I think not. Your are not taking into account the light condition diversity of all photographs.

No, to anyone who has a brain and knows the basics of optics it is obvious that there had to be a shadow in that picture since every object casts a shadow not just every other. Your logic is so flawed, how old are you? Your lack of common knowledge is astounding.

 

[goldzilla]

Inverting an image will show you absolutely nothing. All it does is changing the color of every pixel to its complementary color. It doesn't reveal any new details.
But go on, prove me wrong. What was changed in that picture?

The eyes.

No, to anyone who has a brain and knows the basics of optics it is obvious that there had to be a shadow in that picture since every object casts a shadow not just every other. Your logic is so flawed, how old are you? Your lack of common knowledge is astounding.

Every object automatically casts a shadow? No it doesn't, it all depends on the light source in the room. There are no shadows without light. If I can remember correctly his floorboards were also dark. His photo was not faked at all. It is very sad that people think it was. it is just a way to put him down.

 

[goldzilla]

Show me one single legit measurement where he doesn't try to cheat.

The above is a legit measurement. It's fully on top and he isn't even pressing it hard into himself, admittedly he is not standing but it makes no difference in this case. The only excuse people came up with here is that the entire gif is fake. Sorry but not buying that. This is a very good attempt at a legit measurement.

 

[Ocine]

Inverting an image is an easy way to reveal evidences of photo-shopped images. You can see what pixels have been edited. I am not claiming it is part of any forensic analysis but it is a good method of spotting fakes or getting a closer look at things.

Yeah and inverting an image also show you if the guy use a dildo or no...
We can do so many things by inverting the color of an image! why nobody use it more

 

[963693]

How can you tell anything from that picture? There's no reference, it takes up the entire photo. It's a forced perspective trick. I've called him out on that before, and so have others but he makes excuses as to why he can only take pictures like that to not be identified.

he's a verified member so it is legit.

 

[693987]

he's a verified member so it is legit.

Verified doesn't mean people can't play up angles, and give zero points of reference

 

[1019487]

man

what is it about big dicks that draws in the racist creeps

 

[Shepardson]

The above is a legit measurement.

I'm sorry, but I just don't believe that you can't see through this stuff after all the posts you've read here and things that have been pointed out to you. I'm not real big on this group beatdown thing, but I feel like you're just trying to be argumentative when you back the angledicks like that. It's not rocket science.

 

[Snakebyte]

The eyes.

False. Guess again. The eyes are 100% original.

Every object automatically casts a shadow? No it doesn't, it all depends on the light source in the room. There are no shadows without light. If I can remember correctly his floorboards were also dark. His photo was not faked at all. It is very sad that people think it was. it is just a way to put him down.

Ok, optics for dimwits:
If an object in the picture casts a shadow we do know there has to be a lightsource. We can even pretty much estimate the position of that lightsource because of the angle and the length of the shadow. Hence we can predict where every single object in that picture will cast its shadow. The only thing that's sad is that you don't understand basic things. So yes, there were two objects next to the penis casting a shadow, the penis itself didn't. That's waterproof evidence for an altered picture.

The above is a legit measurement. It's fully on top and he isn't even pressing it hard into himself, admittedly he is not standing but it makes no difference in this case. The only excuse people came up with here is that the entire gif is fake. Sorry but not buying that. This is a very good attempt at a legit measurement.

For a guy who dedicated half of his life to dicks you're pretty easy to trick.
Leaned back, dick pushed down, tape starts way above base, tape bends around the head. All his gifs show a 9" at most. But some people like to believe unicorns exist.

he's a verified member so it is legit.

Not true at all. Verified just means you did send a picture of you and a sign with your name on it. Everyone can do that. Oh wait, he needed three attempts or so.

 

[ItsAll4Kim]

Every object automatically casts a shadow? No it doesn't, it all depends on the light source in the room. There are no shadows without light. If I can remember correctly his floorboards were also dark. His photo was not faked at all. It is very sad that people think it was. it is just a way to put him down.

The shadows in that picture were distinct and sharp-edged. There were no secondary shadows that would indicate a second strong light source. The objects in question were a hand, a penis, and a ruler. All three had the exact same background, namely the floor, below them. All three had the floor visible below them on both sides.

There is no lighting scenario that could possibly explain how a hand holding a ruler against a penis would cast a shadow, as would the ruler, but the penis that's between the ruler and the hand would not.

 

[goldzilla]

False. Guess again. The eyes are 100% original.


Ok, optics for dimwits:
If an object in the picture casts a shadow we do know there has to be a lightsource. We can even pretty much estimate the position of that lightsource because of the angle and the length of the shadow. Hence we can predict where every single object in that picture will cast its shadow. The only thing that's sad is that you don't understand basic things. So yes, there were two objects next to the penis casting a shadow, the penis itself didn't. That's waterproof evidence for an altered picture.



For a guy who dedicated half of his life to dicks you're pretty easy to trick.
Leaned back, dick pushed down, tape starts way above base, tape bends around the head. All his gifs show a 9" at most. But some people like to believe unicorns exist.


Not true at all. Verified just means you did send a picture of you and a sign with your name on it. Everyone can do that. Oh wait, he needed three attempts or so.

Don't be silly the eyes in that photograph were edited. Show me the original photograph then.

as for his measurement, tape starts way above the above the base??? Really. lol. No. But you admit he has 9"? You accept he has a genuine 9 inches?

 

[goldzilla]

The shadows in that picture were distinct and sharp-edged. There were no secondary shadows that would indicate a second strong light source. The objects in question were a hand, a penis, and a ruler. All three had the exact same background, namely the floor, below them. All three had the floor visible below them on both sides.

There is no lighting scenario that could possibly explain how a hand holding a ruler against a penis would cast a shadow, as would the ruler, but the penis that's between the ruler and the hand would not.

Do you have the photograph? Can you re-upload it so we can examine it in more detail.

 

[goldzilla]

man

what is it about big dicks that draws in the racist creeps

Are you calling Dr. Umar Johnson a black psychologist a racist creep? Why? Just because he recommended black men to stay loyal and have children with black women?

 

[goldzilla]

snakebyte can you upload the original photograph of the women you uploaded?

Let's get real. No person has blue eyes like that. They were very obviously edited. Are you claiming those eyes were real? I would like to see and un-edited copy. Or I will look. What is her name?