Let's settle this, cut or uncut? from an aesthetic point.

I did not have a choice as I was cut at birth as were most boys when I was born in Australia.I do wish that I could have a working foreskin for a day to see what it is like but that is not going to happen so I will just have to make the most of what I have.
 
either way as long is clean, !and about

Aesthetics ???​

the must beautiful sculptures in the planet of male figure are uncut…hmmm like David …. Apolo… Zeus .. so again do not care .. as king is hot, above average and clean …
 
  • Like
Reactions: Jagtstein
Uncut, though of course there are some ugly ass uncut cocks. But I think in general the look of a natural penis is more aesthetic. Most circumcision scars are kind of revolting to me. I don't understand why anyone would prefer the look of a mangled cock.
 
Hard to say. Cut cocks always look good when soft. They usually have bigger heads to look at which as we know are the most important part of dicks which but when they get hard technically nothing more happens apart from getting hard. Uncut cocks may be ugly when soft ( wrinkly overhang) but if foreskin is short and pulls back itself when hard showing smooth shiny head that's the most beautiful view. So I think on average cut cocks usually present better but the most perfect ones are uncut.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Hungstraight