Lorenzo blue/bold/william roepstroff

Status
Not open for further replies.
HF! Unless you've grown up in a cave in the Himalayas or a war-torn country without access to the internet, most of us have grown up with visual culture and can recognize a bit of photo editing. You're not "informing" anyone or making people aware of it. It's pervasive in modern culture. When you're standing outside getting wet, you don't need a weather report to tell you it's raining.
 
HF! Unless you've grown up in a cave in the Himalayas or a war-torn country without access to the internet, most of us have grown up with visual culture and can recognize a bit of photo editing. You're not "informing" anyone or making people aware of it. It's pervasive in modern culture. When you're standing outside getting wet, you don't need a weather report to tell you it's raining.
If you do not agree with my observation and comment, you do not need to rely at all. This forum certainly allows freedom of speech and expression. Thank you.
 
HF! Unless you've grown up in a cave in the Himalayas or a war-torn country without access to the internet, most of us have grown up with visual culture and can recognize a bit of photo editing. You're not "informing" anyone or making people aware of it. It's pervasive in modern culture. When you're standing outside getting wet, you don't need a weather report to tell you it's raining.
I strongly disagree. Most people have no idea when an image is edited in a way that's not super cartoonish; you are vastly overestimating the average internet user's competence in this way (or the average porn consumer, in this case). This is evidenced by the fact that so many LPSG threads, Reddit threads, etc. have people earnestly debating whether images are real. People who never visit those threads probably have no idea.

Anyway, my intent was never to repeatedly tell people that the images are edited, only the express why I think editing images and selling them for actual money with the promise that they are real is in fact a form of fraud and unethical. It ought to be illegal, but laws have not caught up with technology at all (don't even get me started on AI), and there tends to be a lot of hesitance and discomfort with public acknowledgement of issues in the porn industry.
 
I strongly disagree. Most people have no idea when an image is edited in a way that's not super cartoonish; you are vastly overestimating the average internet user's competence in this way (or the average porn consumer, in this case). This is evidenced by the fact that so many LPSG threads, Reddit threads, etc. have people earnestly debating whether images are real. People who never visit those threads probably have no idea.

Anyway, my intent was never to repeatedly tell people that the images are edited, only the express why I think editing images and selling them for actual money with the promise that they are real is in fact a form of fraud and unethical. It ought to be illegal, but laws have not caught up with technology at all (don't even get me started on AI), and there tends to be a lot of hesitance and discomfort with public acknowledgement of issues in the porn industry.
Exactly, this is indeed the point. Consumers should be warned and protected.
 


y.
Large companies like L'Oréal or Avon had problems with their false advertising about mascara for example. Everything was photoshopped. A pasted copy:
The large cosmetics groups will now have to be careful about the commercial arguments they use. Because the British are keeping an eye on things and after having sanctioned L’Oréal and Clarins, it is the turn of the American Avon to be reprimanded. Once again it is an advertisement for mascaras which is in question.
The Advertising Standard Authority has simply banned an advertisement from British magazines extolling the merits of Avon's new Rimmel. The reason given: “exaggeration and deception” on performances.
I know, it's for mascara, but it's the same problem.
 
y.
Large companies like L'Oréal or Avon had problems with their false advertising about mascara for example. Everything was photoshopped. A pasted copy:
The large cosmetics groups will now have to be careful about the commercial arguments they use. Because the British are keeping an eye on things and after having sanctioned L’Oréal and Clarins, it is the turn of the American Avon to be reprimanded. Once again it is an advertisement for mascaras which is in question.
The Advertising Standard Authority has simply banned an advertisement from British magazines extolling the merits of Avon's new Rimmel. The reason given: “exaggeration and deception” on performances.
I know, it's for mascara, but it's the same problem.
Exaggeration and deception are certainly no good. Same as AI generated and photoshopped pictures, should be condemned and reported.
 
Aaaand I'm done with this thread now. Well done on ruining it with your obsession with one porn actor's use of snapchat filters. Congratulations, you win, everyone loses.

View attachment 124396371
You should have flown a Boeing. Those doors just release themselves :joy:
 
Who cares if they use filters? Who cares if it’s photoshopped? It’s porn! It doesn’t need to be real, it just needs to be hot. I’m not going to fuck William of Alex so they aren’t selling any false advertisement. When people sub to their OF it’s because they want so see hot and sexy stuff and they are providing it. Editing porn is as old as porn itself and this is a thread about a guy we find hot to discuss how we find him hot and share pictures and videos for him and you are ruining for everyone coming every day to complain of how much you hate everything he does.
 
Aaaand I'm done with this thread now. Well done on ruining it with your obsession with one porn actor's use of snapchat filters. Congratulations, you win, everyone loses.

View attachment 124396371
I do not understand a person’s absolute obsession with criticizing a porn actor’s pictures.
 
Who cares if they use filters? Who cares if it’s photoshopped? It’s porn! It doesn’t need to be real, it just needs to be hot. I’m not going to fuck William of Alex so they aren’t selling any false advertisement. When people sub to their OF it’s because they want so see hot and sexy stuff and they are providing it. Editing porn is as old as porn itself and this is a thread about a guy we find hot to discuss how we find him hot and share pictures and videos for him and you are ruining for everyone coming every day to complain of how much you hate everything he does.
You certainly know a lot about the porn industry and their usual practice due to whatever reasons. Since you are from Columbia, you may even know Alejo Pino in person, due to the fact that he is a Columbian as well. If you do not agree with my observation and comment, you can choose to ignore or to remain silent. This is a forum which honors freedom of speech and expression. At the same time, we have the responsibility to warn other users for exaggeration and deception as well as AI generated and photoshopped pictures for sale in OF from some irresponsible providers.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.