Lpsg Perpetuates Average Isn't Good Enough

[Llbaker]

The excuse that one's penis is too small and therefore a relationship is impossible is utter bullshit.

Yes, of course. I've never said otherwise.

My point has been that men are size conscious and were so before porn was easily available. This size consciousness has been an important factor in the male hierarchy, the phallocracy.

 

[cherryboom66]

How many days has this been raging on for now?

 

[Tattooed Goddess]

How many days has this been raging on for now?

Let's ask Clippy if he has that statistical data readily available.

 

[cherryboom66]

Let's ask Clippy if he has that statistical data readily available.

 

[IntactMale]

Confidence level is different from the interval selected.

To understand male obsession about being "too small" we don't need to know the % within .5% You can have a high confidence with a small sample if you select a reasonable interval which still shows the obsession.

There is a relevance to confidence, and part of confidence is expressed through the confidence interval. I provided you with a few resources you should read before you try to twist statistics to suit your needs any further.

I already said I was done discussing statistics with you since you refuse to acknowledge the science behind statistics.

You said you had "looked at evidence" in order to come to your conclusions about size. Share the evidence or just admit that you never looked at anything or that it doesn't exist. Can you be honest about any part of your argument?

That is either the 4th or 5th time I've asked for you to cite your evidence. Either stop ignoring the request or stop quoting my posts.

 

[IntactMale]

To state if differently, we don't need to know "exactly" what percent think they are too small. We are trying to show there is a very large %. Only a small sample size is required to show the % is between 40 and 60%, In many applications that is why the practical standard is 30 or so. . .

This is a lie and I have already provided multiple sources to show that this is untrue.

 

[IntactMale]

Often, the exact % is important. Then a smaller interval and large sample size is required. I guess this is rocket science.

It's not rocket science. I showed you multiple sources that show that your sample size is extremely small, too small to have any confidence in the findings.

You don't know the first thing about statistics so find a new avenue for your bullshit argument.

 

[IntactMale]

When you have 2 conflicting studies, then you need to examine each for possible flaws in methodology or, if the resources are available, do a larger, better designed study to resolve the issues.

Repeating the study can be of value also as, for instance, a 95% confidence level means 5% of the time, the study won't be representative. Could be an outlier. In science, there is no 'final' finding.

30% is pretty high also. Are you saying 30% is "no problem?"

A 95% confidence level does not mean that 5% of the time the data is inaccurate. You know nothing about statistics so stop talking about it. You should read some of the sources that I gave you earlier that explain confidence and selecting sample sizes.

 

[Llbaker]

Let's ask Clippy if he has that statistical data readily available.

Of what value would be that statistic?

 

[Llbaker]

A larger study? Why larger, if the sample size is already several times greater than the minimum of 30 needed for accuracy?

There could be flaws in methodology, but this was a rather simple question.

Note that even at 30%, the number represents far more men than the percentage who have one standard deviation below the median. So there are men with "average and large penises among those who feel they are "too small". Why would this be? A good suggestion is the porn that says bigger is better, and the lies about size that pervade it.

I have never said there is "no problem", and now is no exception. I've continually said that body image issues can and should be addressed with counseling. Just as most of these studies center around the need for counseling of many men who have an unrealistic body image. I've also consistently pointed out that there's a market for virtually anything and anyone out there. The excuse that one's penis is too small and therefore a relationship is impossible is utter bullshit.

How a sample is drawn is quite important. This is not like drawing from a bowl of black and white marbles which are easily mixed.

 

[Llbaker]

A 95% confidence level does not mean that 5% of the time the data is inaccurate. You know nothing about statistics so stop talking about it. You should read some of the sources that I gave you earlier that explain confidence and selecting sample sizes.

No, it means 5% of the time, the sample is not representative of the population.

 

[Llbaker]

There is a relevance to confidence, and part of confidence is expressed through the confidence interval. I provided you with a few resources you should read before you try to twist statistics to suit your needs any further.

I already said I was done discussing statistics with you since you refuse to acknowledge the science behind statistics.

You said you had "looked at evidence" in order to come to your conclusions about size. Share the evidence or just admit that you never looked at anything or that it doesn't exist. Can you be honest about any part of your argument?

That is either the 4th or 5th time I've asked for you to cite your evidence. Either stop ignoring the request or stop quoting my posts.

No such thing as "confidence interval." We can have a confidence that the % of the population lies within the interval specified.

 

[IntactMale]

No, it means 5% of the time, the sample is not representative of the population.

No, it doesn't mean that either. Again, I gave you sources that you could actually read, but I'm guess that's just something that you USED to do too.

I'm still waiting for you to cite the sources of evidence that you referred to earlier.

 

[IntactMale]

No such thing as "confidence interval." We can have a confidence that the % of the population lies within the interval specified.

Go back and look at the links I provided.

 

[rtg]

LOL, hilarious, you mentioned Harry and Lloyd, and guess who's names those are in a movie? "Dumb and Dumber" LOLOLOL bahahaha, sure seems fitting in this thread.

Hahahaha omg I didn’t even notice! This is the best news of the day

 

[1345864]

Hahahaha omg I didn’t even notice! This is the best news of the day

"Lloyd, just when you couldn't be any dumber...you go and TOTALLY REDEEM YOURSELF!!!"

 

[rtg]

Yes, of course. I've never said otherwise.

My point has been that men are size conscious and were so before porn was easily available. This size consciousness has been an important factor in the male hierarchy, the phallocracy.

Uhhhh no... you’ve also been harping on about how women don’t want a man with a small peen. Geez you can’t even keep up with your own bullshit.

 

[rtg]

There is a relevance to confidence, and part of confidence is expressed through the confidence interval. I provided you with a few resources you should read before you try to twist statistics to suit your needs any further.

I already said I was done discussing statistics with you since you refuse to acknowledge the science behind statistics.

You said you had "looked at evidence" in order to come to your conclusions about size. Share the evidence or just admit that you never looked at anything or that it doesn't exist. Can you be honest about any part of your argument?

That is either the 4th or 5th time I've asked for you to cite your evidence. Either stop ignoring the request or stop quoting my posts.

Don’t you know that he has lived in the world statistics?! DUH!

 

[twoton]

Having studied statistics off and on for 30 years, I'm 95% confident that I'll never understand statistics as well as I should.
Having said that, I'm also 95% confident that 1) a confidence interval is a measure of how accurate our measuring tool is rather than being a measure of the data, per se, and 2) I read somewhere that the inventor of the confidence interval regretted it because it was a) usually misunderstood and b) not worth the trouble it causes.

 

[Tattooed Goddess]

No such thing as "confidence interval." We can have a confidence that the % of the population lies within the interval specified.

I'm 102.28361% repeating with an exponent of 11 multiplied by pi that you are wrong damn near 1,009.28755% of the time. Stick those integers in your statistical pipe and smoke it, Clippy.