Luigi Mangione

Luigis biggest flaw is he's too smart to let his physical perfection leak to the public by sending it to others.
Its probably out there but im CERTAIN he doesnt take full nudes, at least none with his face in them. And it doesnt seem like he has any identifying marks so his body pic will just look like any other sexy white guy lol
 
Its probably out there but im CERTAIN he doesnt take full nudes, at least none with his face in them. And it doesnt seem like he has any identifying marks so his body pic will just look like any other sexy white guy lol
They say he had a love affair with a black girl attending Stanford.
 
  • Wow
Reactions: .airs.
Sorry, but that forum is very disturbing, with 402 page in only 1 month !. Who's care about the guy that he killed, but Luigi is still a killer. He's so average looking and i found weird to sexualizing him knowing that he's killer even if the victim won't be missed.
First, alleged killer, not convicted. We believe in innocent until proven guilty. And based on how things have gone in this case, where his rights were ignored, and he was prosecuted by the NYPD and media before he was even extradited to NY, it's almost ridiculous to believe that we will ever know for sure.

Also, this is LPSG - expecting people to think with anything other than their cocks is a lot.
 
Sorry, but that forum is very disturbing, with 402 page in only 1 month !. Who's care about the guy that he killed, but Luigi is still a killer. He's so average looking and i found weird to sexualizing him knowing that he's killer even if the victim won't be missed.

KlFj2HQfP10hq (1).gif


YOU DONE YET?????????????
 
If I may keep some of you from lusting for a moment…

There have been quite a few posts about how disturbing it is to cheer on a murderer, and I think that deserves a genuine response. So, here's my take:

My first response was 'Murder? To prison you go! You bastard!'
When you ask whether or not murder is alright almost everyone will answer with 'of course not'.

But that question lives in the abstract. Random Person A kills Random Person B. Obviously that is to be detested.

Murder, however, never actually occurs in the abstract but is a real thing involving real people.

Random Person B is Baby Hitler. Still wrong?
Random Person B is a serial killer. Still wrong?

Random Person B a healthcare insurance CEO whose company is responsible for thousands upon thousands of deaths every single year. A company that uses AI to reject claims - about a third - from people who pay hundreds of dollars every month to have access to healthcare. And in the process millions of dollars were earned, literally over the bodies of others.

Still wrong?

Almost everyone in the media starts with 'violence is never the answer'.
Except, it has been - again and again. Violence has been the answer, good and bad, many many times throughout history in every culture and society. In the USA in particular violence has been the frequent method of choice, also by those who hold power.

But, in my humble opinion, violence should only be an answer when you have asked the question in every other way imaginable and have been told no and no again and again. In essence, violence becomes a form of self defence when there's no other path.

Healthcare generally, and in the US specifically, is a disaster and causing millions of people to suffer, be in pain and to die. Even for people who hold insurance, even for people who are financially in a good position.
No serious political effort is made to change it - in fact quite the opposite once again. No corporations, least of all insurance companies, work to make things better. No one seriously considers the actual harm done to actual people (beautiful words notwithstanding). Yet, CEOs, shareholders and political leaders line their coffers.

I can't speak for Luigi, but I think for many people this is not just about healthcare but the entire system. The deck being stacked against everyday people in every way imaginable. People just looking to get by, care for themselves and their families. Nothing excessive.

There's a boiling point and it has been reached or we're about to. Luigi (allegedly) took a stance, he sacrificed himself for a greater cause. The life he ended was that of a mass murderer - just one who did it on paper and is seemingly backed by the law.

It seems troubling. Yes. But is it still troubling once you consider all the context? Once you determine what - morally - qualifies as murder. Once you recognise all the non-violent efforts that have been made to no avail by thousands of people over many years?

Something had to happen. At some point all options are exhausted.

The response of the leaders in our societies will determine what happens next. So far, it does not seem promising.

In the abstract I cannot support Luigi.
In reality, our actual lived reality - I absolutely do.
 
If I may keep some of you from lusting for a moment…

There have been quite a few posts about how disturbing it is to cheer on a murderer, and I think that deserves a genuine response. So, here's my take:

My first response was 'Murder? To prison you go! You bastard!'
When you ask whether or not murder is alright almost everyone will answer with 'of course not'.

But that question lives in the abstract. Random Person A kills Random Person B. Obviously that is to be detested.

Murder, however, never actually occurs in the abstract but is a real thing involving real people.

Random Person B is Baby Hitler. Still wrong?
Random Person B is a serial killer. Still wrong?

Random Person B a healthcare insurance CEO whose company is responsible for thousands upon thousands of deaths every single year. A company that uses AI to reject claims - about a third - from people who pay hundreds of dollars every month to have access to healthcare. And in the process millions of dollars were earned, literally over the bodies of others.

Still wrong?

Almost everyone in the media starts with 'violence is never the answer'.
Except, it has been - again and again. Violence has been the answer, good and bad, many many times throughout history in every culture and society. In the USA in particular violence has been the frequent method of choice, also by those who hold power.

But, in my humble opinion, violence should only be an answer when you have asked the question in every other way imaginable and have been told no and no again and again. In essence, violence becomes a form of self defence when there's no other path.

Healthcare generally, and in the US specifically, is a disaster and causing millions of people to suffer, be in pain and to die. Even for people who hold insurance, even for people who are financially in a good position.
No serious political effort is made to change it - in fact quite the opposite once again. No corporations, least of all insurance companies, work to make things better. No one seriously considers the actual harm done to actual people (beautiful words notwithstanding). Yet, CEOs, shareholders and political leaders line their coffers.

I can't speak for Luigi, but I think for many people this is not just about healthcare but the entire system. The deck being stacked against everyday people in every way imaginable. People just looking to get by, care for themselves and their families. Nothing excessive.

There's a boiling point and it has been reached or we're about to. Luigi (allegedly) took a stance, he sacrificed himself for a greater cause. The life he ended was that of a mass murderer - just one who did it on paper and is seemingly backed by the law.

It seems troubling. Yes. But is it still troubling once you consider all the context? Once you determine what - morally - qualifies as murder. Once you recognise all the non-violent efforts that have been made to no avail by thousands of people over many years?

Something had to happen. At some point all options are exhausted.

The response of the leaders in our societies will determine what happens next. So far, it does not seem promising.

In the abstract I cannot support Luigi.
In reality, our actual lived reality - I absolutely do.
I detest violence in any form, but I also understand that there is a level of non-violent violence that occurs in our society. The response in history has always been that the people being violated eventually rise up against it and use violence to end the suffering they have experienced. Runaway capitalism is just the result of many attempts in history for a very few to control, exploit, and lessen others to live excessively lavish lifestyles at the expense of literally everyone around them without any remorse.

This is just the beginning, and I really cannot blame whoever did this for that, if that was their intent. As of right now, we have not seen the 'evidence' that Luigi is actually the perpetrator, and I've seen more evidence to the contrary based on the public statements. That's another reason I am not too upset about all the lust