Greco-Roman
Superior Member
- Joined
- Jan 7, 2021
- Posts
- 828
- Media
- 0
- Likes
- 3,069
- Points
- 188
- Location
- England (United Kingdom)
- Sexuality
- 99% Straight, 1% Gay
- Gender
- Male
I'd argue the more well known shot from the top with the Barbie doll is more of a flattering shot for Mandingo, and a better angle to judge his size. It's been analysed before on this site or another but I can't remember what size he was guesstimated to be at.I disagree. The position of the doll doesn't matter since I counted the pixels, and it very much is close to parallel with his dick. The doll is at a very slight angle, but is actually closer to the (extreme wide-angle lens) camera, which if anything means the doll would look smaller if it was on the exact same plane as his dick. Adjusting for all factors, i.e. the erection angle, erection quality, standing position, doll position, parallax error, and distortion of the camera, his dick still falls somewhere between 9.5-9.75". You're welcome to pick a better frame from the scene and count the pixels yourself; in fact, I encourage it. I tried to remain as objective as possible but I'm only human after all.
I don't really see it with it with regards to your picture. The dolls leg, even though not completely flush , goes way beyond the tip of his penis. Past his co stars hand even. I think it actually makes him look smaller in this shot.
Not against using pixels, it's quite a interesting method I know little about. I've seen knowledgeable posters use them as a loose reference point. Not sure how exact and completely accurate that method is though.