Measured porn stars??

I disagree. The position of the doll doesn't matter since I counted the pixels, and it very much is close to parallel with his dick. The doll is at a very slight angle, but is actually closer to the (extreme wide-angle lens) camera, which if anything means the doll would look smaller if it was on the exact same plane as his dick. Adjusting for all factors, i.e. the erection angle, erection quality, standing position, doll position, parallax error, and distortion of the camera, his dick still falls somewhere between 9.5-9.75". You're welcome to pick a better frame from the scene and count the pixels yourself; in fact, I encourage it. I tried to remain as objective as possible but I'm only human after all.

Pixels aren’t needed. All that’s needed is common sense. Which you apparently don’t have.
 
  • Like
Reactions: JGUIDO
I disagree. The position of the doll doesn't matter since I counted the pixels, and it very much is close to parallel with his dick. The doll is at a very slight angle, but is actually closer to the (extreme wide-angle lens) camera, which if anything means the doll would look smaller if it was on the exact same plane as his dick. Adjusting for all factors, i.e. the erection angle, erection quality, standing position, doll position, parallax error, and distortion of the camera, his dick still falls somewhere between 9.5-9.75". You're welcome to pick a better frame from the scene and count the pixels yourself; in fact, I encourage it. I tried to remain as objective as possible but I'm only human after all.
I'd argue the more well known shot from the top with the Barbie doll is more of a flattering shot for Mandingo, and a better angle to judge his size. It's been analysed before on this site or another but I can't remember what size he was guesstimated to be at.

I don't really see it with it with regards to your picture. The dolls leg, even though not completely flush , goes way beyond the tip of his penis. Past his co stars hand even. I think it actually makes him look smaller in this shot.

Not against using pixels, it's quite a interesting method I know little about. I've seen knowledgeable posters use them as a loose reference point. Not sure how exact and completely accurate that method is though.
 
  • Like
Reactions: JGUIDO
View attachment 136748751
Almost perfectly from the side.

9.5-9.75"

(this was shot in 2010/11, before he got fat and old)
He looks nowhere near that size when we see him in videos with other guys. For example with Lex Steele, Boz, Wesley Pipes, etc. All guys confirmed around 8 inches he looks nowhere near over 1.5 inches longer than them. Always looks 1 inch longer at most. Not to mention the down completely bends downward by its legs, is placed lower than his dick into his pelvis. This is not a good comparison.
 
It's not about whether it's "flattering" or makes him look smaller. The famous image taken from above is useless for comparison because of the fisheye lens. His dick is right up in the camera and the barbie doll is on a plane underneath. I picked this frame because it's relatively neutral when it comes to the positioning and lens distortion.
I'd still argue it's a better example than this one, even with a fisheye lens. The doll is on line with his dick for a start. Your picture isn't. It has a solid reference point, seeing the doll from head to toe. It almost mimics people posting pictures of there own measurements, along the top side. From the base to the head.

Nothing against what your saying, I love anyone who does there own research with regards to size. Snapshots of porn actors at there biggest, good reference points etc etc. And I think Mandingo is one of the biggest out there, if not the biggest. But your picture doesn't really do him justice, even from a visual point of view. It certainly doesn't tell me he's 9.75". Neither picture does, in all honesty. We'll agree to disagree..
 
  • Like
Reactions: JGUIDO
Again, the position of the doll doesn't matter since I'm counting the pixels. I don't know when he did scenes with those other guys, but he's definitely lost length since the start of his career. Also, Lex is about 8.5, so 1 inch longer sounds about right. Even then, it doesn't matter how he "looks" in comparison to other actors, since I've provided a picture with his dick next to an object with a known size. The barbie doll is 18% longer than his dick, making him around 9.5-9.75", as was estimated quite a while ago before people started gradually downplaying him.
Lex is absolutely not 8.5” lmao, he’s been proven to be maybe just maybe 8.25” at his absolute max, but typically more akin to 8”
 
Again, the position of the doll doesn't matter since I'm counting the pixels. I don't know when he did scenes with those other guys, but he's definitely lost length since the start of his career. Also, Lex is about 8.5, so 1 inch longer sounds about right. Even then, it doesn't matter how he "looks" in comparison to other actors, since I've provided a picture with his dick next to an object with a known size. The barbie doll is 18% longer than his dick, making him around 9.5-9.75", as was estimated quite a while ago before people started gradually downplaying him.
You realize pixel counting is not an exact science either. Having a legit comparison or measurement far out weighs that. Which is why the other pic with the top down view of the doll next to his dick is better. At least the doll is more in line with his dick and based off that photo, he’s around 9” max.
 
This is getting really old. He’s ~8.5-8.75 and this photo proves nothing to suggest otherwise. If anything, it supports that. I swear no one would care this much about this dude if he just surfaced yesterday.
 
  • Like
Reactions: JGUIDO
This is getting really old. He’s ~8.5-8.75 and this photo proves nothing to suggest otherwise. If anything, it supports that. I swear no one would care this much about this dude if he just surfaced yesterday.
Interesting, I wouldn't disagree with 8.75 to 9"...If he's as low as 8.5" then I can imagine a lot of other porn actors sizes would have to be revalued and assessed. Certainly from what I've read in this thread. Or None of these guys are a full 9" and that is reaching.

How many porn stars, amateur or professional, would you put above Mandingo in terms of length?
 
Do you know someone with better software who can draw lines and stuff? I appreciate your criticism but I'd like someone to at least double check my results.
I'm not that technical sorry but I think there are posters in here who use pixels as a reference point. But has as been mentioned, it's not an exact science either, or completely accurate.
 
  • Like
Reactions: JGUIDO
View attachment 136748751
Almost perfectly from the side.

9.5-9.75"

(this was shot in 2010/11, before he got fat and old)

I got 215 pixels for the barbie and 175 pixels for Mandingo's approx NBP.

175 / 215 = 0.814

0.814 * 11.5 = 9.361 inches

And thats with Mandingo angled downward.

And again this is just a pixel count. Its not reality. Nearly all comparisons show Mandingo to be about 9.5 inches NBP max and a few comparisons show him being 9.5 inches NBP and thats being super duper stupid generous.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Greco-Roman
I got 215 pixels for the barbie and 175 pixels for Mandingo's approx NBP.

175 / 215 = 0.814

0.814 * 11.5 = 9.361 inches

And thats with Mandingo angled downward.

And again this is just a pixel count. Its not reality. Nearly all comparisons show Mandingo to be about 9.5 inches NBP max and a few comparisons show him being 9.5 inches NBP and thats being super duper stupid generous.
Nah 9.5 is too much, I don’t think I’ve seen anything that really puts him over 9 nbp max
 
I'm not that technical sorry but I think there are posters in here who use pixels as a reference point. But has as been mentioned, it's not an exact science either, or completely accurate.

And not only does it inherently have its own flaws, but almost everyone who tries to use does so in a thoughtless moronic way and don’t account for angles, distances, etc.
 
  • Like
Reactions: JGUIDO
How many porn stars, amateur or professional, would you put above Mandingo in terms of length?

Miro Manning and Tony Duncan are clearly both longer than him. Manning also has massive girth which takes away a bit of the length visual. I think Gomez and Vlad are of very similar length, especially when they clamp themselves, considering their EQ.
 
  • Like
Reactions: JGUIDO
Miro Manning and Tony Duncan are clearly both longer than him. Manning also has massive girth which takes away a bit of the length visual. I think Gomez and Vlad are of very similar length, especially when they clamp themselves, considering their EQ.

Sly Diggler is also right there as well. I don’t think he’s any less than Mandingo at all actually. He’s just younger and didn’t come around at as lucky of a time where he’d stand out.
 
He’s not bigger. He’s longer. But the length gap probably appears more than it really is because he’s way thicker than Gomez with far more overall volume. Extreme girth will make a dick look shorter than it really is. Gomez is clearly a pumper too.
no Julio Gomez is much longer and almost as thick, BLACKED Zierliche Blondine mit dem größten BBC der Welt
stop the video at 3,49 and you can see how muck longer his dick is than her hand. The average female hand length is 6.8 inches, so he has to be close to 10 inches.