Measured porn stars??

What about Justin Slayer?

Hi sorry, I wasn't familiar with him, but just checked him out. I think he is definitely very long, around 8 inches but his girth is less than Richard Mann and maybe comparable or a bit less than Lexington Steele. I'd guess 8x5.5
 
  • Like
Reactions: Lance Bass
............Part II continues
SubjectDistance: This is the focus distance. Under the XMP format of Adobe it is found as <exif: SubjectDistance>
FocalLength: Focal length of our optics. In XMP it is given by the tag <exif: FocalLength>
In the same way, we can also help us with angular approaches:
The Wide Angle covers between 100º and 60º, the stardard between 50 and 25º, telephoto (which isolates the objects better) between 10º and 15º .... And by the frontality, contrapicado or verticality of the shot in scene (apart from, as I said, metadata and excluding, by the easy to determine, the "fisheye")
With this data, unless we are using extension tubes for macro photography, where we must also know the length of the tube or set of tubes, we can perform almost all calculations.
Then we divide the sensor width by the magnification factor, for example for a focusing distance of 0.45m and a 50mm optics, the magnification factor is 0.15.
And, how to know the lens with which the image was taken? For comparison, the human eye has a viewing angle of about 140 ° by 80 °. The usual is 36 mm × 24 mm (ie 135mm film or 35mm full-frame digital cameras using 36mm width, 24mm height, and diagonal 43.3mm d in the above formula) Compact digital cameras Declare the focal lengths of their equivalent 35mm lenses. We make the mathematical calculation of measurements between diagonal, horizontal, vertical and focal length and we will have the lens used, which will eliminate later, knowing the alteration that presents said lens on projected objects, twists, distances, perspectives and volumes, locating all The elements of photography in parallel, two-dimensional.
All this long process (it is easier to have the right software) eliminates the margins of error in photogrammetry leaving it to a maximum of 0.09, so our measurement will be very correct.
For example, this system serves to find out even the complicated measurements of a marine bubble of a photo in reality, being a round and three-dimensional element, decentering and tilting. Well, this method applied to porn videos and photos, which are susceptible to the same analysis, is the one I use in most cases. For that I review several photos and videos, not just one, and I do the calculations on all of them. Then, to finish, there are even clear signs and "less scientific", such as the navel / pubis distance. All you have to do is add up all, do the average and give the result. With these applications I found out that in some videos and photos, Mandingo reaches 23.9776 cm (9.44 inches), being now its general measurement 23,1902cm (9,13 inches). Criss Strokes in many videos / photos, applying all the steps and software, results in the majority between 7.5 / 7.65 inches. Lex Steele, when you get more, 8.57 inches, Chris Diamond 7.42 '' and so on ... If in some posts I expose photos "without applying" my method is because it is so evident that, serve as an example, Mandingo is More than 1 inch larger than Wesley Pipes, does not need much discussion, even in spite of those "hands" that are valued so much and of the lenses (whatever) that are used.
I add a FIELD OF VISION table below internationally used:
Longitud focal (mm) 13 15 18 21 24 28 35 50 85 105 135 180 210 300 400 500 600 830 1200
Diagonal (°) 118 111 100 91,7 84,1 75,4 63,4 46,8 28,6 23,3 18,2 13,7 11,8 8,25 6,19 4,96 4,13 2,99 2,07
Vertical (°) 85,4 77,3 67,4 59,5 53,1 46,4 37,8 27 16,1 13 10,2 7,63 6,54 4,58 3,44 2,75 2,29 1,66 1,15
Horizontal (°) 108 100,4 90 81,2 73,7 65,5 54,4 39,6 23,9 19,5 15,2 11,4 9,80 6,87 5,15 4,12 3,44 2,48 1,72

complete and utter bollocks!!!!!! this is pictures of measured pornstars not mathematics. this thread has attracted a lot of loons, now you too!!
 
  • Like
Reactions: deleted978960
CHRIS DIAMOND ANALYSIS ( in spanish , check interview & comment posts )

https://www.orgasmatrix.com/entrevista-chris-diamond/

This is pseudoscience bullshit delusion pal. The guy who wrote that is a banned member here, his name raul, rjf.

He was banned from orgasmatrix

https://disqus.com/by/disqus_CCTR5v85mC/

He thinks chris diamond and Mandingo have the same dick length... he has stolon photos of people from this forum such as calboner and impersonated people... this user is a cyber criminal.

are you raul?
 
  • Like
Reactions: deleted978960
Hi sorry, I wasn't familiar with him, but just checked him out. I think he is definitely very long, around 8 inches but his girth is less than Richard Mann and maybe comparable or a bit less than Lexington Steele. I'd guess 8x5.5

Ok thanks

One more..... John Depth?
 
complete and utter bollocks!!!!!! this is pictures of measured pornstars not mathematics. this thread has attracted a lot of loons, now you too!!

Whatever you say .... But I expose my analysis to the public opinion, and I am right on most occasions with the measures. And, of course, without having to resort to low passions and insult anyone. Here everyone is well aware of your inquisitorial methods, much anger and little reasoning. I'm just telling you not to waste your time, no matter how you disqualify photogrammetry or myself, users will be free to believe what is convincing them ... and from what we know in this forum, you do not convince much ...
We all give undervalued measures except you, which you always guess ... Do not you think it's weird?
By the way, this thread is not for photos, but to calculate measures ... if you want a thread just for your entertainment, your photos of hands and cocks, and you get the reason, make a blog!
 
This is pseudoscience bullshit delusion pal. The guy who wrote that is a banned member here, his name raul, rjf.

He was banned from orgasmatrix

https://disqus.com/by/disqus_CCTR5v85mC/

He thinks chris diamond and Mandingo have the same dick length... he has stolon photos of people from this forum such as calboner and impersonated people... this user is a cyber criminal.

are you raul?
LOL. U're very funny. Can you read in Spanish? If you translate the link analysis, you will see that nowhere is said that C.Diamond has the same measure as Mandingo.

Also, I was not referring to Raul's analysis, but to the comments that are after the interview & analysis, from several readers, where someone is very sharp on the measures.

The conclusion reached through these media (pixels per inch PPI monitor) is that Diamond is between 18 and 19 cms. I do not follow that method of the link, as I explained a thousand times. I just attached it so that you could see the difference between the can and the penis ( russian version can "Monster", special edition ), and that by any method it follows that Diamond is more than 7 inches. Through photogrammetry, which PSEUDOSCIENCE has the same thing that you hit with the measures (ie NOTHING), I have been able to deduce (not for one or two manipulated photos, as you usually do, but for multiple videos, photos and other materials) that Diamond has 7.3 ( Alberto Blanco is slightly longer than Nacho, and has been measured in a pic with a burger bun, so he seems to be 7,2. When we watch him with Diamond in a scene together, we can corroborate that he is a little bit shorter )

And no, my name isn't Raúl, but if you want, you can call me that .... By the way, I encourage you to continue attacking and disqualifying what we say to other users, so you define yourself while you continue with your ancients beliefs without provide evidences to the forum.
I have nothing more to discuss with you
regards
 
You are not the first nor will be the last to advocate pseudoscientific methods in this thread. Hmmm so you are not interested in looking at measurements with ruler or tapes but doing your own photogrammetry bullshit. Well that is up to you. Some of your figures are massively downplaying certain pornstars though.

If a man has his dick measured with a tape on screen that is the closest thing you will get to knowing his true size in the real world. The photogrammetry nonsense you have made up is no different than that other hand quackery that was done on this thread. It is delusion pal. Snap out of this.
Photogrammetry pseudoscience? No words needed.........:confused:
I imagine you didn't like maths in primary school
Anyway, Sean Lawless is 7 inches or slightly above
 
  • Like
Reactions: Zaromski
radius=C/2π
where:
C is the circumference of the circle
π is Pi, approximately 3.142

Volume = πr^2h of a Cylinder

Alternatively, I used these two formulas and got the same answers for the total volume of cubic inches for a Lex Steele, Nacho and Mark Ashley
Lex Steele 22.101 ci
Nacho 22.109 ci
Mark Ashley 22.330 ci

Do you get different results ?
Be careful! There are maths enemies near here....
 
  • Like
Reactions: Zaromski and FIODOR
What the size of Alberto blanco please ?

The conclusion reached through these media (pixels per inch PPI monitor) is that Diamond is between 18 and 19 cms. I do not follow that method of the link, as I explained a thousand times. I just attached it so that you could see the difference between the can and the penis ( russian version can "Monster", special edition ), and that by any method it follows that Diamond is more than 7 inches. Through photogrammetry, which PSEUDOSCIENCE has the same thing that you hit with the measures (ie NOTHING), I have been able to deduce (not for one or two manipulated photos, as you usually do, but for multiple videos, photos and other materials) that Diamond has 7.3 ( Alberto Blanco is slightly longer than Nacho, and has been measured in a pic with a burger bun, so he seems to be 7,2. When we watch him with Diamond in a scene together, we can corroborate that he is a little bit shorter )

OK sorry i haven't look .
 
i have to agree with goldzilla on this one i used this methods before and found them non accurate this thread is about measured pics with a tape/ruler or objects with known dimensions i don't want to be rude but u cant solve a dick size to the nearest fraction of inch without a measuring tool next to the dick
 
  • Like
Reactions: goldzilla
i have to agree with goldzilla on this one i used this methods before and found them non accurate this thread is about measured pics with a tape/ruler or objects with known dimensions i don't want to be rude but u cant solve a dick size to the nearest fraction of inch without a measuring tool next to the dick
It's just your opinion, but obviously I'm not agree. I think your measurements & the Goldzilla ones have more failures than hits. You because tend to undervalue the calculations, and he because increases the numbers without meaning. But it is only my opinion. From now on I will only publish in this forum the calculations that I get and that each one compare with yours and draw your conclusions if any user is interested ...
If you don't trust my posts, it's easy....Don't read them!