Measured porn stars??

Seriously, "Indirectly Extrapolated Sizes of Porn Stars" needs its own thread so this one can get back to serving its intended purpose.

Isn't the whole point to try to figure out the size? Many "measured pics" have flaws themselves.

It is one thing if people are just guessing, but if someone is using a clear measurement pic or pics to deduce their conclusion, then what is the problem. We should look at everyone's guesses including measured pics but also just pics that show the erect penis in general, and then we can decide which we agree or disagree with,

I don't understand this attitude.
 
Another classic dick lens example. Look at her porn girl right hand compared to his left. What is that, like 2' away? Imagine putting on some glasses that did that. Within minutes, you'd either run into a wall or have to puke.
 
Children's play!
now I wonder -really somewhere in the title of this thread is specified that only the pictures are useful to measure? I believed that the aim, reading the previous posts, was to calculate- regardless of the means - the most accurate measurements. I do not understand anything either.
Perhaps everything is very simple, and it's because the truth is shown in front of their eyes. That's something that doesn't usually like, it's an old story
 
Another classic dick lens example. Look at her porn girl right hand compared to his left. What is that, like 2' away? Imagine putting on some glasses that did that. Within minutes, you'd either run into a wall or have to puke.

Exactly, you're absolutely right.
For that reason ,calculating measurements with pictures and girls' hands is NOT the most accurate way to operate. To solve such traps from the lens, we must do a mathematical and perspective study, such as Zaromski or Fiodor do. Although some people are reluctant to understand it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Zaromski
It's just your opinion, but obviously I'm not agree. I think your measurements & the Goldzilla ones have more failures than hits. You because tend to undervalue the calculations, and he because increases the numbers without meaning. But it is only my opinion. From now on I will only publish in this forum the calculations that I get and that each one compare with yours and draw your conclusions if any user is interested ...
If you don't trust my posts, it's easy....Don't read them!

Hey, did you see my message? can you send me a PM
 
Also many of us are curious about girth. There are very few if any reliable girth measurement pics. Should we not talk about girth then???

I think Shane Diesel, Billy Glide, Jez Kane, and Shorty mac (the thickest of all) are the only guys 6.5 girth? I would be curious as to an estimate on Julio Gomez. He does look very thick and I can understand why some guessed him at 6.5 girth, but looking at some more I'd guess him at more 6.25. Curious what people think.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Gallowglass
Photogrammetry pseudoscience? No words needed.........:confused:
I imagine you didn't like maths in primary school
Anyway, Sean Lawless is 7 inches or slightly above

I never said photogrammetry was pseudoscience. I said your own method was pseudoscience in relation to what you are doing with dicks.

You have acknowledged the fallacy of cherry-picking, that factors such as different cameras specifications, lens, ratio, lighting, camera distance from the penis, angles or way the hand is held on the penis will greatly mess up estimation results. Do you really think your method neutralizing all these factors? No.

The only way to tell a mans penis size is a ruler or tape on his penis. There is no other way. That is fact.

This thread is called measured porn stars. This means to post in pictures of measured pornstars. No more statistical bullshit please!
 
By the way, this thread is not for photos, but to calculate measures

Lol. You are deluded bro. There are 300 odd pages of photograph measurements on this thread... but sure everyone is wrong and your mathematical calculations are what this thread is really about.
 
I never said photogrammetry was pseudoscience. I said your own method was pseudoscience in relation to what you are doing with dicks.

You have acknowledged the fallacy of cherry-picking, that factors such as different cameras specifications, lens, ratio, lighting, camera distance from the penis, angles or way the hand is held on the penis will greatly mess up estimation results. Do you really think your method neutralizing all these factors? No.

The only way to tell a mans penis size is a ruler or tape on his penis. There is no other way. That is fact.

This thread is called measured porn stars. This means to post in pictures of measured pornstars. No more statistical bullshit please!
My method? Are you talking to me? I think you're deluded
 
Hi sorry, I wasn't familiar with him, but just checked him out. I think he is definitely very long, around 8 inches but his girth is less than Richard Mann and maybe comparable or a bit less than Lexington Steele. I'd guess 8x5.5

Wow you think Slayer is a tad bit shorter than Lex?
 
eric john measured 7,6, maybe 8 ?

Penelope-Looking-For-The-Biggest-Dick-Of-City-300x198.jpg
video ;

https://monsterwhitecock.com/penelope-looking-for-the-biggest-dick-of-city/
 
how long is that bottle?

Bottle is 9.2 inches according to amazon.

Diamond looks around 2 inch less than bottle. (1.5 shorter, but it is on the side which adds around .5 inches usually). That means he is around 7.2 inches. 7.25 was the common estimate around here, Fiodor guessed 7.35 which looks highly possible too.

We can say with certainty he is more than 7 inches, but less than 7.5.
 
  • Like
Reactions: FIODOR and turooso