Measured porn stars??

If you think that Wesley is 8" then you should know that Mandingo is more than 9.5". Wesley did dozens and dozens of early scenes with Mandingo so it is a well documented fact that Wesley is absolutely DWARFED by him. In fact I have a theory that the reason Wesley's porn career stalled out so bad until just last year is because everyone thought he was so small because they were comparing him to Mandingo since they did so many videos together.

All the old-timer experts here at LPSG have come to a consensus years ago that Mandingo is somewhere in the neighborhood of 10.5". With Wesley being shown here to be around 8 - 8.5" I believe we were pretty accurate with that estimation.

I'm going off the photographic evidence here. I might be .5" off either way. I don't watch much porn with Mandingo/Wesley in it and have never seen them 'perform' together.
 
She is being generous here, but I agree with 7.5 inches.
A stickler based on this screen capture would say just 7 inches.
I give myself 7.5 inches and his always "looks" longer than mine.

I've always felt Johnny Sinns has been shortchanged on here! Idk why he is, but he is! Here is a video of a girl measuring him at 8.5in from the side, maybe slightly more. I'd say he is a legit 7.5in(He's admitted that he is 7.5in).

Tlib lily carter-sd169 clip1 - XVIDEOS.COM
 

Attachments

I think this is a good side by side of Shane Diesel and Jack Napier
http://galleries.blacksonblondes.com/content/cherry_torn/pics/pic/27.jpg

This photo is a GREAT example of how little things can trick viewers.

First of all I have seen the scene with Shane and Jack Napier. I must say I was very surprised at the fact that Shane absolutely DWARFED Jack. I really didn't expect that because I estimated Jack to be close to 10" while Shane I estimated at between 9-9.5" But in the scene it was clear that the two mens' lengths were closer than I thought but shane had an enormous girth advantage over Jack.

So what's up with this photo? Well first off Shane is clearly no where near all the way erect, while this appears to be a full sized Jack. Secondly, it may be difficult to spot to the untrained eye, but the cameraman is NOT in fact "side-by-side" with Shane and Jack. In fact it looks like he is positioned directly to the side of Jack (closer) with Shane off a little further away from the lens to the left. There is tons of evidence in this photo to support this assertion. But in the end just watch the original VIDEO and you'll see what I mean. Shane is significantly bigger.