Measured porn stars??
- Thread starter _avg_
- Start date
TinyPrincess
Mythical Member
- Joined
- Mar 26, 2008
- Posts
- 15,947
- Media
- 2
- Likes
- 31,542
- Points
- 368
- Location
- Copenhagen (Capital Region, Denmark)
- Sexuality
- 100% Straight, 0% Gay
- Gender
- Female
Actually funny. If you search the source (https://unravelingsize.wordpress.com), you will find two different answers to the pictures at hand. The metric version of the picture is listed at 4", the US version is listed at 5".
So much for the credibility and/or ability of the author of that page. And I even uses one of his pictures to debunk length. Geez...
So much for the credibility and/or ability of the author of that page. And I even uses one of his pictures to debunk length. Geez...
- RuoG,
for the metric version for the first pic it says 12.7 cm, which is 5 inches
there is whole variety of girths from 4in to 8 in
and the pic link name is the same, so no chance that the metric and us versions are different
Hey guys,
I found a measurement of James Brossman.
It's probably not the best, but can be found here:
http://www.fxporn.net/video/mom-xxx-james-brossman-sharon-lee-big-facial-for-big-tits-asian-beauty
07:45
Cheers!
I found a measurement of James Brossman.
It's probably not the best, but can be found here:
http://www.fxporn.net/video/mom-xxx-james-brossman-sharon-lee-big-facial-for-big-tits-asian-beauty
07:45
Cheers!
Looking at this again and I think he is the biggest in porn if we're talking volume. Julio doesnt look as thick and if hes longer its by just a bit. Mandingo and Mr 18 extra length not enough to make up for significant girth difference. Shane Diesel is way shorter and the same girth really, if he's bigger it's only his head or in small parts etc, Shorty Mac is the thickest of all but so much shorter that his volume wouldn't be comparable.
Funny because this guy is the least well known of them all!
I notice with scenes from guys like Ramon, Shane Diesel, Charlie Mac there are quite a few edits where they look like they were about to get the woman off. I believe real female orgasms in porn happen ALOT more often than people think but porn production companies edit those bits out. This possibly so women who star in porn scenes know they won't end up showing something which is probably the most personal thing a woman can show( her actually having an orgasm) during a porn scene. This way porn companies will be able to recruit more women into the industry as they will know if an accidental orgasm(s) happen on set it will be edited out so something that personal won't be for ever immortalised in film. This would be ALOT more reassuring for women.
That gets me to Max Black, I notice in some of the scenes I have seen him in there did not appear to be as many of these "edits" and moments where it looked like he was about to bring the woman to orgasm ans in general not as much raw emotion from the women in Max Blacks scenes compared to other guys like Ramon, Charlie Mac and Shane Diesel.
I found this on adultdvdtalk about maxx:
Max Black was like a big, rowdy, puppy. He liked to clown a lot. (Which isn't always a bad thing, but sometimes it can get annoying.)
But from a technical porn perspective, (in my view), he had a big dick that he couldn't keep hard, and he was not a very good fuck. He was never in great physical shape, he couldn't stay in the pussy, and as the porn (and the porn girls) got better, harder, and more demanding, he got exposed as not all that great a cocksman. He just didn't bring the noise. I think it is pretty illuminative that aside from Evasive and some web work, not too many other studios used him that much. With the monster package he was sportin', you would think he would have gotten much more work. But he didn't.
Sometimes I got the sense that he wasn't that mature or professional about how he approached his job
Lol. Those women are paid whores. They don't care if someone sees them cumming. And the producers definitely don't care about their feelings.
Kinda blunt/crass way to put it but your right, pornstars have a certain set of priorities and keeping footage of them cumming secret is not one of them lol.
The edits are probably because the girl is in pain or uncomfortable. Hard and huge dicks plowing away compared to a soft erection that keeps falling out.
You should not use terms like calling them "whores" as they are not, they are simply sexually liberated women.
You should be more respectable of their work as plenty if these women have scenes freely available online for you to enjoy.
Yoy
Plus porn companies would probably have a vested interest to keep those candid moments out because many people would just fast forward it to the best bits ( the woman getting off). That way there would be less online members to porn websites as people would get through too many scenes too fast and that means they would run out of scenes to watch ALOT sooner and end their membership.
That would mean alot less money for the porn studios.
Many of them would be trying to keep fragile relationships of theirs with their boyfriend's intact as if their boyfriend is the only one to be able to get them to orgasm.
Plus porn companies would probably have a vested interest to keep those candid moments out because many people would just fast forward it to the best bits ( the woman getting off). That way there would be less online members to porn websites as people would get through too many scenes too fast and that means they would run out of scenes to watch ALOT sooner and end their membership.
That would mean alot less money for the porn studios.
No its just not plausible. They literally scream with orgasmic pleasure whenever a dick touches them, the whole goal of half of porn now is to make it seem as real as possible it all ahas a fake amature sheen. Im sure porn producers would love to catch real intense mutually enjoyable sex on camera rather than over acted mechanical inanity..
