really difficult to estimate a guy's size from a penetration video, he maybe in the 8s with girth in the low 5s
Measured porn stars??
- Thread starter _avg_
- Start date
Pretty sure he messes with the aspect ratio on his vids. Always looks odd.
Just like with pictures you can alter the aspect ratio so it looks longer. Either that or uses fisheye lens. He is big but not as big as it appears.
I’d agree with 8.5
He has twitter account: https://twitter.com/Pornstarr_vonni , to me look about lexington steele size - low to mid 8", <8.5".
So here is porn star, Alex Davis. He is one of the bigger ones that I see out there on the main sites.
https://www.xvideos.com/video29188159/petite_teen_bangs_cock_bigger_than_banana#_tabComments
https://www.xvideos.com/video29188159/petite_teen_bangs_cock_bigger_than_banana#_tabComments
Could somebody explain how this is altered besides being bone pressed. It doesn't look to be 10" but how is it able to read 10" on the ruler
Double0- You get a knack for this after a while, but basically, one of the things to look for in shopped pictures is overly well-defined, artificial looking shadowing. You can copy some selected part of an image, and drag or enlarge it. When you do this, you also need to see that the newly edited part casts a convincing shadow in the direction it would have been in were the part actually present under those conditions (it needs to match the rest of the shadowing in the shot). People tend to either go overboard on this, or to run with Photoshop's default shadow settings which are a bit too obvious and well defined.
In the picture in question, the entire top left half of the dick is actually missing the (possibly bogus) shadowing that the rest of the objects cast in that direction. In the previous shot with the extender, you can see that the thumbnail on the one on the right doesn't cast the same shadow that all the rest of the thumb's left edge casts. An artificial shadow is essentially an object which sits under the shadowed object. You can move it around to emulate what would happen if light hit the object in a given direction, but it won't always follow the rules exactly, and you need to tweak it. If the aforementioned shadow is moved toward the tip of the thumb, the thumbnail now obscures part of it, yet if the entire left side of the thumb casts something so noticeable, in real life you would at least see something roughly the same from the nail. Light sources in real life also won't typically appear with the same width and clarity in several directions at once. You'll notice that happening in a lot of dick pictures.
You'll get better at it after a while, but unfortunately, the rule today seems to be that it's fake until proven genuine. With pictures of dicks beyond a certain size, they're almost all bullshit at this point. If it's not direct digital editing, it's going to be deceptive angling or camerawork.
Hope that helps!
PS- I started to enlarge the dick in this edit, but when you turn those things loose in the wild, they spread all over everywhere. SDP did it a couple times as an example and now I get hit with his images or gifs in banner ads on every other porn site.
In the picture in question, the entire top left half of the dick is actually missing the (possibly bogus) shadowing that the rest of the objects cast in that direction. In the previous shot with the extender, you can see that the thumbnail on the one on the right doesn't cast the same shadow that all the rest of the thumb's left edge casts. An artificial shadow is essentially an object which sits under the shadowed object. You can move it around to emulate what would happen if light hit the object in a given direction, but it won't always follow the rules exactly, and you need to tweak it. If the aforementioned shadow is moved toward the tip of the thumb, the thumbnail now obscures part of it, yet if the entire left side of the thumb casts something so noticeable, in real life you would at least see something roughly the same from the nail. Light sources in real life also won't typically appear with the same width and clarity in several directions at once. You'll notice that happening in a lot of dick pictures.
You'll get better at it after a while, but unfortunately, the rule today seems to be that it's fake until proven genuine. With pictures of dicks beyond a certain size, they're almost all bullshit at this point. If it's not direct digital editing, it's going to be deceptive angling or camerawork.
Hope that helps!
PS- I started to enlarge the dick in this edit, but when you turn those things loose in the wild, they spread all over everywhere. SDP did it a couple times as an example and now I get hit with his images or gifs in banner ads on every other porn site.
Attachments
Yeah I could see that but I think bp measurements count too. I have maybe 1 1/2 of fat pad that's useable for sex so his real measurements are 8"" bp and maybe 7.25" nbp could we agree on that
Damn, I should have stayed on here for a minute 
No- That was an edit of his edit. I have no earthly idea what the original looked like. With images which were edited by the dick owner themselves, the original will often never see the light of day and the fake one goes straight to the internet, so it's not like you can Google image search and find it to compare.
Sorry about the confusion.
No- That was an edit of his edit. I have no earthly idea what the original looked like. With images which were edited by the dick owner themselves, the original will often never see the light of day and the fake one goes straight to the internet, so it's not like you can Google image search and find it to compare.
Sorry about the confusion.
Well in the "original" image there is an idea of a shadow at about 8". Maybe you ain't so far off.Damn, I should have stayed on here for a minute
No- That was an edit of his edit. I have no earthly idea what the original looked like. With images which were edited by the dick owner themselves, the original will often never see the light of day and the fake one goes straight to the internet, so it's not like you can Google image search and find it to compare.
Sorry about the confusion.
Yeah, I see that now. It could also be something which was carried along with the relocated dick end though, or something in the grain pattern of the floor. It does look like part of the floor has been moved around, maybe to mask the area to prepare for the new dick. You can see a horizontal line to the left of his glans where it's misaligned.
TinyPrincess
Mythical Member
- Joined
- Mar 26, 2008
- Posts
- 16,041
- Media
- 2
- Likes
- 31,861
- Points
- 368
- Location
- Copenhagen (Capital Region, Denmark)
- Sexuality
- 100% Straight, 0% Gay
- Gender
- Female
Why is there black tape over the numbers? Looks weird.
