Measured porn stars??

His dildo looks 5.5 insertable. That's why I said 5.5x6.1 is probably the accurate measurement. But that does not mean his dick is that size. The point about insertable length on a dildo vs actual NBP irl depending on the ball positioning is very valid.

Actually you are quite wrong about how a "realistic" dildo is made. "Ball positioning" has zero effect on the size of the dildo. When a mold is made - said porn star inserts into the mold as far as they can go - full length - balls shoved back etc. The shaft is all that is molded and usually the balls are added and sculpted on later - and some shaft length is added to accommodate them. That way if they want - they can add a few inches in length to the insertable shaft if they so desired. Even if they don't add length they sure as hell don't take any away in the ball addition. That is why the realistic dildo is NEVER smaller than the actual penis it is molded on. Often it's quite a bit larger, but never smaller.

I have actually been there when molds of talent were made. So I know of what I speak. Now I don't know what the actual size of Manuel is but it's not going to be bigger than the insertable part of the dildo that much you can be sure of.
 
Actually you are quite wrong about how a "realistic" dildo is made. "Ball positioning" has zero effect on the size of the dildo. When a mold is made - said porn star inserts into the mold as far as they can go - full length - balls shoved back etc. The shaft is all that is molded and usually the balls are added and sculpted on later - and some shaft length is added to accommodate them. That way if they want - they can add a few inches in length to the insertable shaft if they so desired. Even if they don't add length they sure as hell don't take any away in the ball addition. That is why the realistic dildo is NEVER smaller than the actual penis it is molded on. Often it's quite a bit larger, but never smaller.

I have actually been there when molds of talent were made. So I know of what I speak. Now I don't know what the actual size of Manuel is but it's not going to be bigger than the insertable part of the dildo that much you can be sure of.
Tommy_Gunn-2-1.jpg
Tommy_Gunn-5-1.jpg
Tommy_Gunn-4-1.jpg
Tommy_Gunn-6-1.jpg
 
Actually you are quite wrong about how a "realistic" dildo is made. "Ball positioning" has zero effect on the size of the dildo. When a mold is made - said porn star inserts into the mold as far as they can go - full length - balls shoved back etc. The shaft is all that is molded and usually the balls are added and sculpted on later - and some shaft length is added to accommodate them. That way if they want - they can add a few inches in length to the insertable shaft if they so desired. Even if they don't add length they sure as hell don't take any away in the ball addition. That is why the realistic dildo is NEVER smaller than the actual penis it is molded on. Often it's quite a bit larger, but never smaller.

I have actually been there when molds of talent were made. So I know of what I speak. Now I don't know what the actual size of Manuel is but it's not going to be bigger than the insertable part of the dildo that much you can be sure of.


Agree with the ball comment. They are added on at the end - pseudoballs!
 
DHhFwg1W0AAEv4F

https://mobile.twitter.com/Crosxsover75/status/911268339368054784

Why does this guy look 6inches in some, then 8inches at other times?
 
Why do you think they often shoot "big cock" porn with wide angle lenses?
Dummy photography question, but is the "focal length" thing we've seen described in here controlled by the same optomechanics as a camera's "angle width", or are they two totally different things? For instance, you can do "sphere" type effects after-the-fact with software, but they only seem to produce the rounded room look, whereas professional dick lens photography seems to have a way of expanding just the foreground objects without always noticeably distorting the rest of the frame. -Thanks if anybody knows that stuff!
 
  • Like
Reactions: iruleyou
Dummy photography question, but is the "focal length" thing we've seen described in here controlled by the same optomechanics as a camera's "angle width", or are they two totally different things? For instance, you can do "sphere" type effects after-the-fact with software, but they only seem to produce the rounded room look, whereas professional dick lens photography seems to have a way of expanding just the foreground objects without always noticeably distorting the rest of the frame. -Thanks if anybody knows that stuff!

A professional wide angle lens is what is used to distort the size aspect and is much less noticeable than any after effect - "sphere" "fish eye" effect etc. Focal length, depth of field and angle width are all related - and each different lens effects all those aspects as well.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Shepardson
Actually you are quite wrong about how a "realistic" dildo is made. "Ball positioning" has zero effect on the size of the dildo. When a mold is made - said porn star inserts into the mold as far as they can go - full length - balls shoved back etc. The shaft is all that is molded and usually the balls are added and sculpted on later - and some shaft length is added to accommodate them. That way if they want - they can add a few inches in length to the insertable shaft if they so desired. Even if they don't add length they sure as hell don't take any away in the ball addition. That is why the realistic dildo is NEVER smaller than the actual penis it is molded on. Often it's quite a bit larger, but never smaller.

I have actually been there when molds of talent were made. So I know of what I speak. Now I don't know what the actual size of Manuel is but it's not going to be bigger than the insertable part of the dildo that much you can be sure of.

Agreed
 
According to his dildo his girth is 5.5 inches. They aren't going to make a porn stars dick smaller than his dildos size.
True, and I actually believe he is 5.5 inches in girth. A lot of you guys are underestimating how much a little difference in girth makes a big difference. Most guys in porn are around 5" girth. The ones who are noticeably thicker are roughly .25 more then that, such as Mike Adriano. Anne Alberite actually says Manuel and Mike are similar but Manuel is bigger and I assume she's talking girth. Here is the link: http://liloleme-adt.tumblr.com/post/26470223652/the-new-aaa-amazing-anikka-albrite-speaks-her
 
  • Like
Reactions: iruleyou
True, and I actually believe he is 5.5 inches in girth. A lot of you guys are underestimating how much a little difference in girth makes a big difference. Most guys in porn are around 5" girth. The ones who are noticeably thicker are roughly .25 more then that, such as Mike Adriano. Anne Alberite actually says Manuel and Mike are similar but Manuel is bigger and I assume she's talking girth. Here is the link: http://liloleme-adt.tumblr.com/post/26470223652/the-new-aaa-amazing-anikka-albrite-speaks-her
I think she means length, because Mike's head is probably the same girth as Manuel's shaft. Manuel is definitely longer than him. And he fucks fast and tries to go deep. Mike looks about 6-6.5, while Manuel is probably 7-7.25 bone pressed.
 
I think she means length, because Mike's head is probably the same girth as Manuel's shaft. Manuel is definitely longer than him. And he fucks fast and tries to go deep. Mike looks about 6-6.5, while Manuel is probably 7-7.25 bone pressed.

Lol yeahy Manuel Ferrara is 7 plus inches "bone pressed" even though his dildo molded from his dick is 5.5 or 6 inches. I guess dildo companies are starting to make realistic dildos molded from porn stars dick smaller than their actual dick.