Measured porn stars??

To me it is impossible to believe that Nacho is 5.75'' girth, Manuel is 5.5'' girth, and especially Ian Scott is 5-5.2'' girth. Those numbers beggar belief to be honest. It would be nice and confidence boosting for many men to believe, but those guys listed above are simply too thick for me to believe those numbers.
i disagree with ian or nacho to be under 6" but it's not impossible for manuel just watch him with a regular size woman doesn't look that impressive[/QUOTE]

It is impossible for Manuel to be under 6. You used to say he was 6.25 in his old days. It is disappointing how you just picked a team and stuck with it instead of trying to be accurate.
 
I know it's hilarious he actually put them in the "between 5.25 and 5.5" category LOL
To me it is impossible to believe that Nacho is 5.75'' girth, Manuel is 5.5'' girth, and especially Ian Scott is 5-5.2'' girth. Those numbers beggar belief to be honest. It would be nice and confidence boosting for many men to believe, but those guys listed above are simply too thick for me to believe those numbers.[/QUOTE]
Lol I'm not listing their girths @ those numbers for a confidence boost, that's why I provided evidence. I'm not one of these retards who just declares a size without showing anything. A lot of you guys have a warped view of size from being on this site too much. I'm 100% sure about Manuel Ferrara around 5.5, Mike Adriano around 5.25, Jason Brown around 5.25, Dredd around 6.1, and Mandingo around 5.25 uppershaft maybe 5.5 lower, it's not my problem if you don't want to believe it but it's pretty obvious to me at this point from hours of research and observations on these guys.
 
It's frightening how wrong your girth estimates are and quite obvious you have an agenda once you claim to be 5.6 and say Manuel is 5.5 max rotfl.....

Ian Scott is not average to just over average girth...He is one of the biggest guys in porn and mainly because of his girth.
This is true, there might be some bias there.
I also will be surprised if even some of the veterans of this thread who are known to be on the more downplaying side support the number Plas95 gave. I doubt the numbers he gives for girth for Manuel, Nacho and Ian Scott would have much support even from members such as unknownuserx or Snakebyte.[/QUOTE]
i am not downplaying i use more accurate methods than guessing based on how big someone looks snakebyte doesn't downplay also he just analyze measured pics and rarely gives his own opinion
 
  • Like
Reactions: plas95
To me it is impossible to believe that Nacho is 5.75'' girth, Manuel is 5.5'' girth, and especially Ian Scott is 5-5.2'' girth. Those numbers beggar belief to be honest. It would be nice and confidence boosting for many men to believe, but those guys listed above are simply too thick for me to believe those numbers.
Lol I'm not listing their girths @ those numbers for a confidence boost, that's why I provided evidence. I'm not one of these retards who just declares a size without showing anything. A lot of you guys have a warped view of size from being on this site too much. I'm 100% sure about Manuel Ferrara around 5.5, Mike Adriano around 5.25, Jason Brown around 5.25, Dredd around 6.1, and Mandingo around 5.25 uppershaft maybe 5.5 lower, it's not my problem if you don't want to believe it but it's pretty obvious to me at this point from hours of research and observations on these guys.[/QUOTE]

You're wrong it doesn't matter if you did 100000 hours. I showed you your theory of girth being distributed differently was WRONG. And you just don't address it. You are a complete moron autistic lunatic spending 10000 hours and coming to biased conclusions.
 
i disagree with ian or nacho to be under 6" but it's not impossible for manuel just watch him with a regular size woman doesn't look that impressive

It is impossible for Manuel to be under 6. You used to say he was 6.25 in his old days. It is disappointing how you just picked a team and stuck with it instead of trying to be accurate.[/QUOTE]
so any one disagrees with you is not accurate ?? i beileved he was atleast 6 before my study but then after watching many scenes of him i have better view now
 
This is true, there might be some bias there.
I also will be surprised if even some of the veterans of this thread who are known to be on the more downplaying side support the number Plas95 gave. I doubt the numbers he gives for girth for Manuel, Nacho and Ian Scott would have much support even from members such as unknownuserx or Snakebyte.
i am not downplaying i use more accurate methods than guessing based on how big someone looks snakebyte doesn't downplay also he just analyze measured pics and rarely gives his own opinion[/QUOTE]

You do downplay you used to say Manuel is 6.1 and may have been 6.25. Now with more evidence of his actual size based on several dildo owners saying they measured it and it's 6.1 or 6.25 you say he mite be under 6 because you are biased.
 
It is impossible for Manuel to be under 6. You used to say he was 6.25 in his old days. It is disappointing how you just picked a team and stuck with it instead of trying to be accurate.
so any one disagrees with you is not accurate ?? i beileved he was atleast 6 before my study but then after watching many scenes of him i have better view now[/QUOTE]

Your study was for length you are showing bias now indeed
 
Lol I'm not listing their girths @ those numbers for a confidence boost, that's why I provided evidence. I'm not one of these retards who just declares a size without showing anything. A lot of you guys have a warped view of size from being on this site too much. I'm 100% sure about Manuel Ferrara around 5.5, Mike Adriano around 5.25, Jason Brown around 5.25, Dredd around 6.1, and Mandingo around 5.25 uppershaft maybe 5.5 lower, it's not my problem if you don't want to believe it but it's pretty obvious to me at this point from hours of research and observations on these guys.

You're wrong it doesn't matter if you did 100000 hours. I showed you your theory of girth being distributed differently was WRONG. And you just don't address it. You are a complete moron autistic lunatic spending 10000 hours and coming to biased conclusions.[/QUOTE]

And one more thing saying Mandingo is 5.25 girth is one of the dumbest things ever said on this website.
 
You do downplay you used to say Manuel is 6.1 and may have been 6.25. Now with more evidence of his actual size based on several dildo owners saying they measured it and it's 6.1 or 6.25 you say he mite be under 6 because you are biased.
do you realize how silly you sound ? just because i have different opinion then i am downplayer biased with agenda
 
  • Like
Reactions: plas95
Now you know how I feel going at it with this guy lol.

Pretty much everyone agreed with my girth estimates not yours it's like 12 to 0 even unknownsuserx agreed with me on all of them now he says Manuel could be under 6 because he's biased
But you know you're wrong and an idiot deep down.

Unknownuserx I used to think Goldzilla was out of line but now I thijnk he's right you are a biased guy with a small dick
 
do you realize how silly you sound ? just because i have different opinion then i am downplayer biased with agenda
To be honest unknownuserx, I have noticed the point where you start your analysis on pics isn't exactly where it should be most of the time. You start it slightly up the shaft instead of where it meets the skin on top of the shaft.
 
do you realize how silly you sound ? just because i have different opinion then i am downplayer biased with agenda

You said Manuel was 6 or 6.25 then MORE evidence came out confirming that and instead of strengthening your opinion or it staying the same you went in the opposite direction with no new evidence. And now hiding behind it's your "opinion"
 
To be honest unknownuserx, I have noticed the point where you start your analysis on pics isn't exactly where it should be most of the time. You start it slightly up the shaft instead of where it meets the skin on top of the shaft.

Yes exactly these guys start nbp like 0.5 inch from pubo mound
 
  • Like
Reactions: Zaromski
To be honest unknownuserx, I have noticed the point where you start your analysis on pics isn't exactly where it should be most of the time. You start it slightly up the shaft instead of where it meets the skin on top of the shaft.
can you show me an example ??
 
Pretty much everyone agreed with my girth estimates not yours it's like 12 to 0 even unknownsuserx agreed with me on all of them now he says Manuel could be under 6 because he's biased
But you know you're wrong and an idiot deep down.

Unknownuserx I used to think Goldzilla was out of line but now I thijnk he's right you are a biased guy with a small dick
actually i think you really have some thing for manuel you always makes it personall when someone try to tell you he is not as big as you think, as for the small cock part i ignored it in the past maybe that made some believe true or something idk but i don't have small cock dude get over it i am longer than the mean average bp (6.3) i was 5.1 last year but as i said before i lost some weight and now i am 5.25" show me one study that suggest that is smaller than 1 std from the mean
 
From the little time I've been on this thread, unkownuserx is one of the best people here because he actually provides visuals and evidence to support his length measurements unlike a lot of you guys who just babble and attack anyone who doesn't agree with you but yet have nothing to show.
 
Several people have the Manuel dildo and all that measured it got figures between 6 and 6.25. The other figured given were grosd estimates by shipping company.There is a scene of him holding it against his dick and he is at least the same. Anyone arguing under 6 is biased.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Zaromski