Naked in nature

His dick is ruined because it has an ugly foreskin. But that can be remedied.
Nature made it the way it is supposed to be. No ugly scar. No misshapen shaft nor skin bridges or dry rough glans. No loss of sensitivity nor control. He won't lose nerves. He won't have to use lube. No 2 tone. No increased risk in urinary infections in later life. No increase in risk for prostate problems. He won't be at risk to have a meatotomy. He won't be at higher risk for ED. Sex will be more comfortable and enjoyable to his partners. He has more to play with.
 
Nature made it the way it is supposed to be. No ugly scar. No misshapen shaft nor skin bridges or dry rough glans. No loss of sensitivity nor control. He won't lose nerves. He won't have to use lube. No 2 tone. No increased risk in urinary infections in later life. No increase in risk for prostate problems. He won't be at risk to have a meatotomy. He won't be at higher risk for ED. Sex will be more comfortable and enjoyable to his partners. He has more to play with.
Circumcision has nothing to do with those things you listed. The scar is ok with me. I haven't heard any circumcised friends lamenting about their scars. Circumcision has not a thing to do with prostate enlargement in later life, how could It? Or urinary infections either. I often see red and inflamed meatus of guys who are not circumcised. I've heard of cancer of the penis of uncircumcised guys. So no thanks, I like my circumcised dick.
 
  • Like
Reactions: japetty
I don't understand the problem. The foreskin of someone who isn't circumcised pulls back anyway when aroused. Seems like once you're in the middle of the sex act they would both appear - and work - the same anyway. I'm uncircumcised but have no problem with either.
 
His parents should be kicked in the shins for not having him circumcised.

What a stupid statement. I love when dicks come in all shapes and sizes. Uncut or cut, I love playing with them all!
 
5b86c8d93f6df_original.jpg
5b86c8d9cf7b2_original.jpg
5b86c8ef600f9_original.jpg
5b86c8f57a0cf_original.jpg
5b86ca526f775_original.jpg
 
Circumcision has nothing to do with those things you listed. The scar is ok with me. I haven't heard any circumcised friends lamenting about their scars. Circumcision has not a thing to do with prostate enlargement in later life, how could It? Or urinary infections either. I often see red and inflamed meatus of guys who are not circumcised. I've heard of cancer of the penis of uncircumcised guys. So no thanks, I like my circumcised dick.

Studies show that 100% of circumcisions leave a scar 100% of the time. Sorry, but you need to read up. Circumcised men have a higher incident of urinary tract infections than do men with a foreskin. Circumcised babies do have a slightly lower incidence but that changes once mama stops taking care. Maybe the "red and inflamed" meatus of the guys you have seen are their natural color? The constant scrubbing of the glans against clothing makes like a callous. Circumcised men also have cancer of the penis. The incidence of penile cancer in Israel is much higher than in Denmark. Circumcised men who are nudists also have a much higher incidence of penile cancer on the glans. The foreskin protects the glans from that. I figure that you will next bring up HIV. Look at the WHO HIV maps. Mexico has a much lower rate of Hiv than the USA. Japan has a lower Hiv rate than does Saudi Arabia.
 
This was very entertaining, until the freaking cut/uncut obsessives arrived to hijack still another thread. Please stop! Take it to the Healthy Penis forum, where you can be entertained for hours. Thank you.
Would that be "compulsive obsessive about circumcision or Obsessive Compulsive about circumcision" These folks need professional help with their issue. Way off base with the issue. Sick, Sick, Sick!!! The sad thing is they have it spread all over these forums.