Nicholas Galitzine

Yes I’ve read and listened to that podcast. I’ve also stated that I’ve heard bringing up his sexuality was not an approved question/narrative by his agent. Nick has never point blank stated his sexuality and this further proves that. ;)
But he didnt dodge the question, he answered directly. And how do we know that the statement "For the record, Galitzine identifies as straight." was not approved by his agent or himself?
I kind of read before that you are in the industry so maybe you see things that I dont. Plus im not native and could misunderstand some concepts.
Or maybe is the way most people keeps ambiguous?
 
But he didnt dodge the question, he answered directly. And how do we know that the statement "For the record, Galitzine identifies as straight." was not approved by his agent or himself?
I kind of read before that you are in the industry so maybe you see things that I dont. Plus im not native and could misunderstand some concepts.
Or maybe is the way most people keeps ambiguous?
its 50/50 if they approved it or not but it helps the narrative so if they had the option they probably would say it was fine to print. But the point is he himself has never confirmed it, it’s all insinuations from third parties that his agent could definitely have a hand in but who knows.

Keeping it ambiguous like you said is key. That way if something comes out (like TZP/G situation) they can play the other card that they never said anything so they weren’t lying~ He comes across way more media trained than Taylor does so that benefits him.