oddpurple
Superior Member
- Joined
- Sep 17, 2017
- Posts
- 1,018
- Media
- 0
- Likes
- 9,855
- Points
- 358
- Location
- Ontario, Canada
- Sexuality
- Non-Binary
- Gender
- Female
Anything to deflect or deny what I said despite Jeffer, a pan man who dated a transman confirming it in his text above. Just so you know, I'm talking about transexuals not transgenders
If you really want to get into it then fine lol
You ended your post off with the following
“ If Luis is indeed choosing not to fully transition because of money, then it's valid but if he's choosing not to transition because they thinks they don't need to but still refers to themselves as a trans man, then that's a problem”
Your problem is that you think that’s some sort of solution or “finish line” but this thread itself has shown that some don’t even consider that enough and still call more feminine trans men like Noahway a woman and continue to discredit his gender.
The point is some people will NEVER be happy and will live in their transphobic and or dismissive views, so trying to set some benchmark standard on what it is or isn’t to be valid as a trans person in terms of the physical presentation. Is a trans woman not a woman if she never gets gender reassignment surgery and still has a penis? What if she’s on estrogen but doesn’t get facial feminization surgery.
I’m not trying to dismiss the physical aspect outright, because using your point, if a ultra fem cis woman declares she’s a trans man then I know she’s not going to be taken seriously in that moment, but like I said, making a check sheet on the physical requirements and aspects is not a way to go about determining what’s valid because there is no universal list and there never will be.