Not here to argue
![Smile :) :)]()
But in my mind a pencil dick is about appearance more than any exact numbers.
Never seen one, but I guess a 10" x 5.5" would look really thin though it is perfectly average girth (or even a bit above).
And the same the other way around. Dick that is 5" x 5.5" would look really thick.
You hit nail on the head here. The whole concept of pencil dick, big dick, average, dick, and so on is bit of a paradox in that, is one’s determination based on measurement or optics? (And that’s parking for a moment the whole conversation about honesty in comments….just people, I believe, make the comment they do just to get a reaction outta someone.)
You mention that, for you, it’s appearance/optics. For me, it’s more the actual numbers.
I’m big “down there” but don’t look it. Primarily because I’m a big guy overall (250+ lbs here, big frame, etc.), so my cock size is often underestimated.
Neither your way or my way are more right than wrong; they’re just our preferred perspective/stance on things.
But I think that there is there difference in how folks overall classify a cock as big, thick, average, pencil-thin, or whatever really needs to be taken with an element of a grain of salt.
(I say the above somewhat behind the curtain, as I’m someone who’s anguished over my cock size. I have to repeat the above to myself more often than I’d like to acknowledge.)