Random thoughts

Photos of theater-loving service dogs go viral
And the story behind why they were there is even better.

04_Service_dogs_from_K-9_Country_Inn_Working_Service_Dogs_attended_a_relaxed_performance_of_Billy_Elliot_the_Musical_at_the_Stratford_Festival_in_Stratford_Ontario_Canada_on_August_7_2019.jpg.653x0_q80_crop-smart.jpg



02_Service_dogs_from_K-9_Country_Inn_Working_Service_Dogs_attended_a_relaxed_performance_of_Billy_Elliot_the_Musical_at_the_Stratford_Festival_in_Stratford_Ontario_Canada_on_August_7_2019.jpg.838x0_q80.jpg


In_Stratford_Theatre.jpg.838x0_q80.jpg



Photos of theater-loving service dogs go viral
 
i am sure some may want to know what Kiwis get up to


Recommended by

Police put wrong fuel in vehicles 28 times in one year
Danielle Clent09:29, Nov 10 2019
  • Email



48s
stuff-logo.png

Six easy ways to reduce your fuel costs

Worried about rising petrol prices? Here are six easy ways to reduce the cost.

Taxpayers have forked out more than $11,000 in one year after police staff put the wrong fuel in their vehicles.

A total of 28 incidents of misfueling were reported from October 2018 until September 2019.

Information obtained under the Official Information Act found Wellington police were the worst offenders, with six instances.

Central police officers weren't far behind with five incidents.


1573334828234.jpg

ANDY JACKSON/STUFF
In total, the 28 mistakes made by police cost taxpayers $11,860.89 in repairs.
READ MORE:
* What not to put in your fuel tank this summer
* Pensioner's car written off after putting in $13 of diesel exhaust fluid

In the last 12 months, AA Roadservice were sent to more than 1000 incorrect fuel incidents nationally.

ADVERTISEMENT

Advertise with Stuff
AA motoring advisor Cade Wilson said misfueling can be a "frustrating and often costly experience".

"It's more common for motorists to put petrol into a diesel system than the other way around and, unfortunately, it has potential to be the most damaging," Wilson said.

The process and cost of repair depended on the type of vehicle and how long it had been running on incorrect fuel, he said.

1573334828234.jpg

JOHN BISSET/STUFF
AA motoring advisor Cade Wilson said it is more common for motorists to put petrol into a diesel system - and it is the most damaging.
"I think some drivers can be on autopilot at the gas station and reach for the fuel they're used to and forget what vehicle they're driving and ignore all the signs that are actually very noticeable if you take a step back and look."

In total, the 28 mistakes made by police cost taxpayers $11,860.89 in repairs.

The Taxpayers' Union said this was a case of disrespect for taxpayer property.

Spokesman Louis Houlbrooke said New Zealanders were capable of handling the "basic" task of filling up their car as it was important to them.

"Police seem to need a better understanding of the value of a car and property funded by the taxpayer," he said.
 
anyone interested in prolonging life
apart from ....


five: exercises to help avoid an early death
Easy-to-access activities that help to reduce blood pressure, cholesterol and the risk of heart disease


Gregory Robinson

Sun 10 Nov 2019 05.30 GMT




Yoga reduces risk factors for heart disease, including high BMI and cholesterol.
Running

The five: exercises to help avoid an early death
 
they were probably safer there than elsewhere



Scientists helped a horde of cannibal ants escape from a Soviet nuclear bunker
If you were trapped in a bunker with no food or sunlight, you’d probably eat your neighbors, too.

KeoQJF4wchvfCzekFKlnEQTknp1eDP0oMHIdIzg9IG-NTGReCnvhUVILcpx11TE6-gIL2FzG3iMBSjCDV5SxSOSNLgWnNYoGHvYWUmaHpiANPjj3wUfc0EJl1UCyCoFq1gLKDDanhIXNPwze9VqQZgo3NINXZTHZthDYCp5le2v4HqM2gp7pM8hk3-duzLuf55l_qaLpA6IYvMedXD8L9ewmISg=s0-d-e1-ft
 
had plenty similar on my island
tried hard to get rid of pesky feral cats that did not distinguisn
h between willife for food


This critically endangered skink is getting its own tropical island

Tweet

13

September 11, 2019

RUSSELL MCLENDON


Photo: Parks Australia
It has been nearly a decade since the last confirmed sighting of a wild blue-tailed skink on Australia's Christmas Island, where the species is now considered extinct in the wild. Scientists managed to collect several dozen of the colorful lizards before they vanished, though, and thanks to a successful captive-breeding program, about 1,500 blue-tailed skinks now live in captivity.

The next step is to start releasing captive-bred skinks back into the wild, hoping they'll establish a new self-sustaining population. But instead of doing that on Christmas Island, where they might face the same threats that wiped out their predecessors, wildlife officials are trying a different approach first: giving the embattled lizards their own private island.

Blue-tailed skinks — not to be confused with North America's five-lined skink, whose juveniles are also known for their cerulean tails — were abundant on Christmas Island as recently as the late 1970s. They're only about 10 centimeters (4 inches) long, but they radiate color and charisma, as Brendan Tiernan of Parks Australia recently told Australia's ABC News.

"They have obviously a bright blue shimmering tail, but the rest of their body is also quite colorful, almost rainbow in appearance," Tiernan says, citing their golden back and "brassy burnt-red" head. "When they were in the wild they were quite gregarious and arboreal," he adds, "always moving around, chasing little patches of sunlight."

The blue-tailed skink of Australia's Christmas Island is likely extinct in the wild, but a captive-breeding program aims to help the species bounce back. (Photo: Parks Australia)

A decline was first reported in 1992, followed by a dramatic crash in the species' population, according to the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN). The main problem seems to be predation by non-native wolf snakes, which were introduced to Christmas Island in 1982, along with other exotic predators such as feral cats, rats, yellow crazy ants and an invasive centipede.

Researchers collected 64 skinks from Christmas Island in 2009, according to the IUCN, then began breeding them in captivity at two locations. Managed by Parks Australia and the Taronga Zoo, the captive-breeding program has helped the species multiply with impressive speed, increasing the known population of blue-tailed skinks by more than 2,000% in just a decade.

Given the prevalence of exotic predators on Christmas Island, wildlife authorities are wary of releasing captive-bred skinks back there quite yet. While captive breeding has helped other species reclaim their ancestral habitats, captive-bred animals often lack the survival skills and general savvy of those raised in the wild. This sometimes leaves them overly vulnerable even to native predators, not to mention exotic species that might have already wiped out their wild relatives once before.

The Cocos (Keeling) Islands consist of 27 small coral islands, located in the Indian Ocean about midway between Australia and Sri Lanka. (Photo: Bildagentur Zoonar GmbH/Shutterstock)

So, rather than starting with Christmas Island, the skinks' caretakers decided to first take them nearly 1,000 kilometers (600 miles) west, to an even more remote — and presumably safer — sanctuary. Their new home is in the Cocos (Keeling) Islands, an archipelago of 27 islands in the Indian Ocean, only two of which are inhabited by people. On Sept. 7, 150 captive-bred blue-tailed skinks were released on Pulu Blan, ABC News reports, a tiny island without people or invasive predators to get in the way.

Pulu Blan is one of two uninhabited islands where authorities plan to release the skinks. The Cocos (Keeling) archipelago was chosen because its climate is similar to that of Christmas Island, but there are some notable differences between the two habitats. The Cocos archipelago is more of an idyllic "beautiful turquoise-blue landscape" dotted with coconut palms, as Tiernan describes it, compared with the more rugged, mountainous karst of Christmas Island.

Despite its relative safety right now, the island chain isn't quite as isolated from humanity as it might seem. Pulu Blan stands no more than 2 meters (6.6 feet) above sea level at its highest point, according to ABC News, giving it little buffer from a rising ocean. Global sea levels are now rising by 3.4 millimeters (0.13 inches) per year — due to melting ice sheets and thermal expansion of seawater caused by human-induced climate change — and could rise by more than a meter in the next 80 years alone.

Still, as the planet's widespread wildlife declines look increasingly like a mass extinction, there's a particular urgency to saving rare species these days. The blue-tailed skink populations in the Cocos Islands will be an experiment, according to researchers, who still hope to eventually help the lizards recolonize Christmas Island, too.
 

Space is already congested — but companies including SpaceX and Amazon have plans to launch thousands of satellites into orbit in years to come. (ESA)
Astronomers face satellite boom
Spaceflight company SpaceX is set to launch 60 more of its Starlinks communications satellites into orbit today, with hundreds more scheduled this year. And SpaceX is just one of many companies planning to launch tens of thousands of satellites in the coming years. Astronomers fear that these ‘megaconstellations’ could disrupt radio frequencies used for astronomical observation, create bright streaks in the night sky and increase congestion in orbit, raising the risk of collisions.
 
looting/thieving a lowest form of sub humans in our surefire decline in humanity
no wonder people are often shot for taking advantage of others
not particularly worried re that
wonderful human huh,can alllow myself that ha

Au BUSHFIRES
feel foir you AUSSIES
take care, suggest
listen to the advice given by the specialists

really like the firefighters/volunteers efforts
invaluable,often placing others before them
 
Cat with five beds prefers laptop
11th November 2019
catlap-667x375.jpg




A CAT with five different beds has chosen to occupy a laptop computer.

Gordon, a ginger cat, decided to position himself on the laptop despite the fact it had not been on for a while and was not even warm.

Gordon’s owner, Emma Bradford said: “The five beds do not include the couch and the chairs which are essentially just massive cat beds.

Cat with five beds prefers laptop
 
  • Like
Reactions: Questionable Meat
our PM John Key once propposed similar the length of NZ
ot to admire people with foresight for others for the future
unlike selfish greedy others huh



We're taking a detour from stories created this week to share this file about the world's longest hiking trail. Canada's Great Trail is the longest recreational trail in the world and it covers 14,864 miles. (Our readers sure liked it, and our readers are never wrong.)
Like this email? Share it with a friend and invite them to subscribe.
 
and
more fascinating than said humans i bet
bird brain indeed

These birds prove you don't need a big brain for a complex social life
Until now, multilevel societies were known only in brainy mammals.

RUSSELL MCLENDON
November 8, 2019, 8:27 a.m.

vulturine-guineadowl-location-hidden-by-shutterstock-01.jpg.653x0_q80_crop-smart.jpg

Vulturine guineafowl may be the first non-mammal species known to create multilevel societies. (Photo: Martin Mecnarowski/Shutterstock)

Birds can form complex, multilevel societies, a new study finds, a feat previously known only in humans and certain other big-brained mammals, including some of our fellow primates as well as elephants, dolphins and giraffes.

This challenges the idea that large brains are required for such a complex social life, the researchers say, and may offer clues about how multilevel societies evolve.


It's also further evidence that birds — despite their relatively small brains — aremuch smarter and more sophisticated than we tend to assume.

Leveling up
A group of vulturine guineafowl trots through Tsavo East National Park in Kenya. (Photo: Marius Dobilas/Shutterstock)

The subjects of this study are vulturine guineafowl, a heavy-bodied, ground-feeding species native to scrublands and grasslands in northeast Africa. These birds are an impressive sight, with a vivid blue breast and long, glossy neck feathers leading up to a bare, "vulturine" head with intense red eyes. And now, as researchers report in the journal Current Biology, we know they live in impressive societies, too.

Vulturine guineafowl are highly social, living in flocks of a few dozen birds. Of course, there are lots of social birds and other animals around the world, many of which live in much larger groups. A murmuration of starlings, for example, may number several million. A multilevel society is defined less by size, however, than by "different structural orders of grouping," according to Current Biology Magazine, forcing members to use more mental energy tracking multiple kinds of relationships.

"Humans are the classic multilevel society," study co-author Damien Farine, an ornithologist at the Max Planck Institute of Animal Behavior, tells The New York Times. In fact, he adds, people "have long hypothesized that living in complex society is one of the reasons why we’ve evolved such large brains."

A multilevel society may also exhibit "fission-fusion" behavior — in which the size and composition of social groups change over time — but not all fission-fusion societies are multilevel. Fission-fusion "refers to fluid grouping patterns," researchers explain in Current Biology Magazine, but "is not tied to a particular social organization."

Living in a multilevel society can offer big benefits, with different levels of the society serving specific adaptive purposes that evolved in response to different cost-benefit trade-offs. This includes reproduction and social support at the lowest tier, for instance, as well as perks like cooperative hunting and defense at higher tiers.

Due to the mental demands of managing relationships in a multilevel society, scientists have long believed this social structure only evolves in animals with the brainpower to deal with its complexity. And until now, multilevel societies have only been known in mammals with relatively big brains, the researchers note. While lots of birds live in large communities, these tend to be either open groups (lacking long-term stability) or highly territorial (not friendly with other groups).

Birds of a feather



These birds prove you don't need a big brain for a complex social life
 

Camera traps capture the elusive silver-backed chevrotain. (SIE/GWC/Leibniz-IZW/NCNP)
Meet Vietnam’s ‘rediscovered’ mouse-deer
Once thought lost to science, the silver-backed chevrotain has been found again in forests near the city of Nha Trang, Vietnam. Although local people still knew of the deer, camera-trap photos are the first scientific evidence of Tragulus versicolor in nearly 30 years. Researchers hope that the sightings will be followed up by ground surveys to assess the population, which is threatened by hunting, deforestation and the encroachment of urban areas into its habitat.

Nature | 2 mins
Reference: Nature Ecology & Evolution paper

O7WTQEnITOZlyL4KA4aKiGmHCzH4NzqgyPFIHtwIbjV5jH9unK6oGUqbqAidqbHMBcA_mD4YCG3a0T8i71w72InomCYTBeqcPb0ah40e1nQ=s0-d-e1-ft


Morning meme animal thing:
It’s not what Bilbo says, it’s how he says it. This fluffy, orange cat shares his love with the world by purring for 30 minutes straight in each of his podcasts.


Rise of a cat influencer
 
i do think it was a positive result as they took preventative measures that certainly prevented loss of human life

homes and animals lost yes,to be expected unfortunately

i think the 3 human deaths occurred prior to yesterdays predicted Catastrophic event,that was lowered to a warch and wait as early as 5 pm NSW time

no human deaths during yesterdays event was a good result

the expectation is that Queensland will possibly suffer today,what NSW experienced yesterday



gettyimages-1181049812-e1573509089844.jpg

PETER PARKS / AFP via Getty Images
THE LAND DOWN UNDER
Here’s why Australia is having a cataclysmic wildfire season
By Zoya Teirstein on Nov 12, 2019 at 3:58 am

daily dose of good news from Grist Subscribe To The Beacon
California isn’t the only place with wildfire woes this year. Weeks before the start of summer, southern Australia is ablaze with some of the most ferocious early-season wildfires the continent has ever seen. This week, a “catastrophic” fire warning was declared in the greater Sydney and Hunter Valley areas. Almost 4,000 square miles of land has gone up in flames, 150 homes have burned down, and at least three people have died.

On Sunday, the New South Wales Fire Service announced the fire threat on Monday would be “worse than originally forecast” — prompting New South Wales Premier Gladys Berejiklian to declare a state of emergency for the next week.

In mid-October, the New South Wales fire service already saw signs of an unusually intense fire season. “It’s important to remember that this is no ordinary bush fire season and we can’t afford to have anyone think this is just another year,” said the fire service’s commissioner in a press release at the time.

This isn’t the first time the dry state has gone up in flames. In 2013, a similar state of emergency was declared when the Blue Mountains were ablaze. But this year is certainly worse than usual, and the reason has to do with climate change. Rising temperatures don’t create fire out of thin air, but they can make wildfires a whole lot worse.

Since 1910, Australia has warmed by a little more than 1 degree C. And crucially, rainfall between the summer months of April to October has decreased by 11 percent in the southeast portion of Australia since 1970. Between May and July — the winter season — rainfall has decreased by roughly 20 percent. Monday might be the first day in recorded history that nary a drop of rain fell anywhere on the Australian mainland — a development that had the weather nerds at the country’s Bureau of Meteorology scratching their heads, according to the Sydney Morning Herald.

“Australia has had a nasty combination of very, very dry conditions and also very warm conditions across the last several months,” Dr. John Abatzoglou, associate professor of earth systems at the University of Idaho, told Grist. “It’s essentially primed a lot of the fuels there to basically be receptive to carrying fires.”

Though the tree species native to Australia are different from the ones seen in the United States, Abatzoglou said, “The recipe for fires in Australia very much mirrors what we see in some of the forests we have here in the western U.S.” The seasons may be backward in the Land Down Under, but the wildfires act the same.

NOMINATE!
 
GOOD NEWS
QUEENSLAND has not yet had its fire threat level raised ro CATASTROPHIC
no emergency situation,at this time

be interesting to see if the state of Qld operates a similar preventative system as NSW did yesterday

2pm NZT so assume its 11am Qld
get thru the day be cool
 
QLD Au
been spared fiortunately, nothing ever looked likely
glad we all took precautions
move on, to the next stage ..

SUPERGLAD
NSW
has spent the time to experiment,for the future possibilities
 
dont talk shit Aussie parliamentarians going on about the GREENs trying to score political points
sure,that was a 2 4 hours ago mention

your just as bad as any American or Pomme politician bringing it up again
ie
another 24 hours later FFS

also
a few deaths be thankful its not many deaths
 
and
THAT is how fires happen now
when i was caught up in central coast Au fires mid 90s,they
werent so bad,esp gusts,strength of wind etc


its happeng,its real


exactly
and what are they at least trying to do about it

Wild Swings in Extreme Weather Are on the Rise



Firefighters battle the Maria Fire in Santa Paula, California on November 1. AP PHOTO/NOAH BERGER

Climate Whiplash: Wild Swings in Extreme Weather Are on the Rise
As the world warms, scientists say that abrupt shifts in weather patterns — droughts followed by severe floods, or sudden and unseasonable fluctuations in temperature — are intensifying, adding yet another climate-related threat that is already affecting humans and natural world.

BY JIM ROBBINS • NOVEMBER 14, 2019

From 2011 to 2016, California experienced five years of extreme drought, during which numerous high temperature records were broken. These hot, dry years were followed by the extremely wet winter of 2016 -2017, when, from October to March, an average of 31 inches of rain fell across the state, the second highest winter rainfall on record.

All that rain meant a bumper crop of grasses and other vegetation, which, as hot and dry conditions returned, likely contributed to a combustible mix of fuels that played a role in the severe fires that have swept California in the past two years.

These wild swings from one weather extreme to another are symptomatic of a phenomenon, variously known as “climate whiplash” or “weather whiplash,” that scientists say is likely to increase as the world warms. The intensity of wildfires these days in places like California are a symptom of climate change, experts say, but the whiplash effect poses a different set of problems for humans and natural systems.Researchers project that by the end of this century, the frequency of these abrupt transitions between wet and dry will increase by 25 percent in Northern California and as much as double in Southern California if greenhouse gasses continue to increase.
GettyImages-903944588_Cali-mudslide-2018_web2.jpg

“There has been an assumption that the main thing we have to contend with climate change is increased temperatures, decreased snowpack, increased wildfire risk” on the West Coast, said Daniel Swain, a climate scientist at the University of California, Los Angeles. “Those things are still true, but there is this other dimension we will have to contend with — the increased risk of extreme flood and drought, and rapid transitions between the two.”

Tree ring data shows a significant increase in climate volatility in the last 60 years in Europe.
Last year in Montecito, California, one of the state’s worst wildfire


Climate Whiplash: Wild Swings in Extreme Weather Are on the Ris
 


yeah yeah yeah
talk to the deaf and blind

but NO
I DONT THINK THATS REALLY SO these days
i feel more and more oof us fellow humans are very animal/nature conservationilist minded these days
GREAT
many more fighting greed and selfishness



OPINION

The Real Case for Saving Species: We Don’t Need Them, But They Need Us


Conservationists argue that humans need to save species in order to save ourselves. The truth is we could survive without wild species — but they can’t survive without us, and the moral argument for protecting them and the beauty they bring to the world is overwhelming.

BY CARL SAFINA • OCTOBER 21, 2019
I recently visited a museum exhibit on big cats. A sign featuring a beautiful jaguar asked, “Why should we care about wild cats?” Its answer: “Because in protecting big cats, we are protecting ourselves.”

Is that really true? That implies big cats are in trouble because “we” don’t care to protect ourselves. And if it turns out that we don’t really need jaguars in order to protect ourselves, have they lost their case for existence?

For decades, many conservationists have been trying to sell a clumsy, fumbling appeal to self-interest: the idea that human beings need wild nature, need wild animals, need the species on endangered lists. “If they go extinct, we’ll go extinct,” is a common refrain. The only problem: it’s false.

We drove the most abundant bird in the Americas — the passenger pigeon — to extinction. The most abundant large mammal — the American bison — to functional extinction. We gained: agriculture, and safety for cows, from sea to shining sea. Who misses the Eskimo curlew? Indeed, who knows they existed, their vast migrating flocks like smoke on the now-gone prairies? That experiment is done.

Billions of people want what you and I got in exchange: health and wealth and education. We now live the way most other people on the planet wish to live. Governments, institutions, and regular people have cheered the material expansion that has cost many species (and tribal peoples) everything. We have endangered species not because what is bad for them is bad for us, but because the opposite is true: what is bad for them has fueled the explosive growth and maintenance of human populations and technologies. We are losing many species along the way to humanity’s only three apparent real goals: bigger, faster, more. Propelling the human juggernaut has entailed wiping many species out of the way. People live at high densities in places devoid of wild species and natural beauty. Human beings have thrived by destroying nature. When the animals and open spaces go, we have industrial-scale farms and factories, ball fields and strip malls and quick-lubes. How could saving this or that endangered species, that is following those whose oblivion brought fast food and sneakers, be a matter of — of all things — saving ourselves? Telling people that “we” need jaguars to “protect ourselves?” That’s a hard sell. We don’t need them.

Jaguar (Panthera onca). SOURCE: SHUTTERSTOCK

Lest anyone misread me: this predicament is catastrophic.


Yet many conservationists continue trying to make the flimsy case that we need endangered species. And because the argument is false, it can be a counterproductive pandering to the self-interest of people who simply won’t care. “Prove that I need some endangered snail or whale.” You can’t.


Sperm whales (Physeter macrocephalus). SOURCE: SHUTTERSTOCK


But how best to press the case for life on Earth?

Ecology — living relationships and reliances — may be the only concept containing sufficient scope for a future worth humanly living. Ecology is most easily perceived by this shorthand: natural beauty. Each of our senses has ways of informing us what is good and bad. Our sense of smell evolved to sense things good for us as smelling pleasant and bad as smelling putrid. Our mind evolved the ability to combine all our sense into one overall detector of what is good in the world, and that best overarching sense is what we call “beauty.” As the beauty of the world drains away, we become less than human in the long run. And part of the long run is now.


Hyacinth macaw (Anodorhynchus hyacinthinus). SOURCE: PAVAN/WIKIMEDIA COMMONS

Beauty is the single criterion that best captures all our deepest concerns and highest hopes. Beauty encompasses the continued existence of free-living things, adaptation, and human dignity. Really, beauty is simple litmus for the presence of things that matter.

The Real Case for Saving Species: We Don’t Need Them, But They Need Us
 
  • Like
Reactions: Toddcc987