Senate Staffer Caught Filming Gay Sex Tape In Senate Hearing Room

Tbh, I don’t get why this guy was fired. How does having an only fans impact your ability to be impartial? Such a weird Christian morality issue.
Because it was in his workplace, in an iconic enough room that has it’s own name is the place where important things happen. It was even an office. That’s why the right wing picked up on it and why it’s newsworthy.

Having homemade porn linked to yourself might get you fired by a current employer even if this wasn’t a senator, but probably wouldn’t make the news. But a lot of companies don’t even want the risk of something like that being tied to their public image.
 
So let me get this straight the dude whose name is Brian Gnatt is Realdaddydick right? Brian also have kids and was married to a woman ? Brian also works with Aidan right ? Feel free to correct me cause I was Hella confuse.
I haven’t even gone down that rabbit hole. No ones even posted any links or screen shots to support the link of BDD to Brian Gnatt.

Everyone’s too busy moral policing instead of trying to get to the bottom of what really happened.
 
  • Like
Reactions: milo_N Milk
I haven’t even gone down that rabbit hole. No ones even posted any links or screen shots to support the link of BDD to Brian Gnatt.

Everyone’s too busy moral policing instead of trying to get to the bottom of what really happened.
what's unclear to you about what happened?
 
what's unclear to you about what happened?
Nothing is unclear, there’s just a lack of evidence to support the whole story since everything is wiped.

-timeline of events (archived pages then first breaking on The Spectator soon after)
- MSM not catching on till days later
- socials of those involved being only a few years old with few likes+followers
- Aidan’s IG Bio: “PR @faceless” (is this some internet disinformation spreading cyber warfare group?)
- bigdaddydicks true identity
- Full video still not leaked by “leaker”
- Aidan not coming out publicly with a statement besides LinkedIn
 
  • Like
Reactions: atomicnightz
Nothing is unclear, there’s just a lack of evidence to support the whole story since everything is wiped.

-timeline of events (archived pages then first breaking on The Spectator soon after)
- MSM not catching on till days later
- socials of those involved being only a few years old with few likes+followers
- Aidan’s IG Bio: “PR @faceless” (is this some internet disinformation spreading cyber warfare group?)
- bigdaddydicks true identity
- Full video still not leaked by “leaker”
- Aidan not coming out publicly with a statement besides LinkedIn
k
 
Here's some new reporting on that account.
Why are some people entertaining this failed journalist who is obviously desperate for attention? Those sex tapes are over a year old and the investigation couldn't even verifiably connect it to the staffer.
 
Why are some people entertaining this failed journalist who is obviously desperate for attention? Those sex tapes are over a year old and the investigation couldn't even verifiably connect it to the staffer.
He's piggybacking on Semafor's reporting and is desperate enough to divulge information that responsiable news outlets aren't willing to publish.

He can get away with it because he's reporting that the staffer was investigated for the tapes not that he was actually the one in the tapes. And, everyone seems to have confirmed that he was in fact investigated.
 
So let me get this straight the dude whose name is Brian Gnatt is Realdaddydick right? Brian also have kids and was married to a woman ? Brian also works with Aidan right ? Feel free to correct me cause I was Hella confuse.
AFAIK no one connected to this situation works together.
 
I feel the problem is that the internet telephone game will inevitable turn "was investigated for sex tapes" into "verifiably filmed the sex tapes". You're right though that this reporter is just desperate for engagement, but so far it seems his attempt to milk the Semafor's story has flopped.
It will only intensify if the tape leaks.
 
We got guys ruining their lives in the name of "acceptance" into a toxic space that has nothing but heartache and pain in it. Guys who dont even have to do that in the first place.

We are not building a community of strong minded individuals who are intelligent enough to recognize when they are being tricked into failure and ruin through social programming and social engineering. All this porn and sex is being weaponized against us and as , you got many of these white guys feeling themselves off of the whole complextion of protection mentality. They not even realizing how socially programmed they are. All these guys who feel they have to be muscled up, have to have a photo of themselves in a speedo or briefs, anything indicating or hinting at sex and etc on social media usually. Its like as a gay man, is that REALLY necessary? And nobody is calling it out.

Whether some people in here want to ADMIT IT OR NOT, the "purdish" shit is a necessary evil. Theres a time and place for everything. Time for folks to start wisening up and moving with some damn intelligence. Not everything in gay culture is positive and needs to be followed just like these gay folks doing all these risky sexual activities with no protection except PreP.

You know the powers that be did a number on us recently when you have folks within the gay space thinking that stds done disappeared where bareback sex is normalized with big pharma introducing drugs that minimizes the chanced of getting hiv transmitted. The miseducating of sex health through pornography and porn actors who some arent even gay misdirecting a whole community to put their lives at risk. Its social engineering how condoms and basically safe sex is basically being pushed out the window for fucking pharma pills and folks in the community arent questioning shit. I cant be around a bunch of zombies who dont think and just doing shit to "fit in"

I’m begging you to take a social media break. The amount of posts you’ve written in this thread is too much. You’re halfway to a novel already. Log off. :skull:
 
Nothing is unclear, there’s just a lack of evidence to support the whole story since everything is wiped.

-timeline of events (archived pages then first breaking on The Spectator soon after)
- MSM not catching on till days later
- socials of those involved being only a few years old with few likes+followers
- Aidan’s IG Bio: “PR @faceless” (is this some internet disinformation spreading cyber warfare group?)
- bigdaddydicks true identity
- Full video still not leaked by “leaker”
- Aidan not coming out publicly with a statement besides LinkedIn

Everyone’s too busy moral policing instead of trying to get to the bottom of what really happened.

-Someone tipped off a right wing media website on the 15th
-msm likes to give democrats the benefit of the doubt, unless it’s Fox news msm.
-socials besides for BDD are all deleted. Only thing out there is Aidan’s “professional” X account that I assume he probably just lost the password to.
-that was not his instagram. Numbers are way off compared to the screenshots previously posted
-the “full 4 minute video” thing is just people spamming trying to phish or scam you. There’s no long ass video of them doing it in the senate room. There’s like two short clips and then the picture Aidan had taken on the table.
-he’s embarrassed and at this point I’m sure someone involved in the situation has hired one of the many PR firms in DC and told him to delete EVERYTHING he can and to not say anything to anyone. This literally stayed in the media longer this week because of his linkden statement creating another headline. Now there’s nothing new to report about.

I don’t even think he was the staffer that yelled that stuff at the jewish congressman. He vehemently denied ONLY that of all things.
 
  • Like
Reactions: HVFac
Nothing is unclear, there’s just a lack of evidence to support the whole story since everything is wiped.

-timeline of events (archived pages then first breaking on The Spectator soon after)
- MSM not catching on till days later
- socials of those involved being only a few years old with few likes+followers
- Aidan’s IG Bio: “PR @faceless” (is this some internet disinformation spreading cyber warfare group?)
- bigdaddydicks true identity
- Full video still not leaked by “leaker”
- Aidan not coming out publicly with a statement besides LinkedIn
Here is what happened, to the best of our knowledge. I know you want to see a conspiracy, so I'm not going to go on and on about this with you. But this is the timeline:

1) Sometime within the last few years, perhaps as recently as the last year: RDD and AMC begin some kind of sexual, probably romantic, relationship.

2) RDD creates or already has a Twitter alt, where he posts videos and photos of sex with AMC. No one obviously uses their real names and RDD never shows his face, although AMC shows his face at least once.

3) AMC, an out and proud newish congressional staffer, is part of a whole milieu of horny young gay guys, who stay in touch with at least one WhatsApp group, dishing the tea like any other young gay set, except that they also happen to work in and around one of the most famous places in the world. The men in the WA group share gossip and porn and are amused by AMC's sexcapades. It's the kind of space where the norm is to out-outrageous each other, and over-the-top acts are rewarded with praise (a familiar tale in all kinds of young gay social groups).

4) AMC, whatever his promises to RDD around exclusivity (possibly there are none at all), is sexually active with others too. He meets ST, a visiting German political student, and they have sex. AMC hatches a plan to have sex in a famous Senate hearing room -- which will allow him to tell a tale to his friends that will top them all (pun sort of intended). AMC will reserve the room in Cardin's name, and it seems foolproof because it's not the kind of place anyone else would go into if reserved at some late hour. ST agrees to go along with this plan.

5) At some point in late 2023, possibly during the week of December 11th, AMC may or may not have shouted a controversial and highly charged statement at a US rep who was being interviewed. In any case, news breaks that he is the staffer who yelled at the representative.

6) On or about December 13th, AMC and ST fulfill their plan and have sex in the Senate hearing room. AMC posts a still-photo reel of their encounter to "close friends" on Instagram. That reel expires within 24 hours. He also shares a 7-second vid of the encounter in the WhatsApp group.

7) On December 15th, somebody in that WA group sends the vid to The Daily Caller, or somebody that person shared it with does this (or someone that person shared it with does this). TDC publishes an article about the matter, which goes viral. Also on this evening, AMC posts a LinkedIn message, which he deletes on December 18th.

None of this seems the least bit implausible, with the exception of #5, which still seems murky but ultimately is unrelated to the rest of it, except as a possible motivator for the leak. What you've posted, to the extent I even understand it, does.
 
Here is what happened, to the best of our knowledge. I know you want to see a conspiracy, so I'm not going to go on and on about this with you. But this is the timeline:

1) Sometime within the last few years, perhaps as recently as the last year: RDD and AMC begin some kind of sexual, probably romantic, relationship.

2) RDD creates or already has a Twitter alt, where he posts videos and photos of sex with AMC. No one obviously uses their real names and RDD never shows his face, although AMC shows his face at least once.

3) AMC, an out and proud newish congressional staffer, is part of a whole milieu of horny young gay guys, who stay in touch with at least one WhatsApp group, dishing the tea like any other young gay set, except that they also happen to work in and around one of the most famous places in the world. The men in the WA group share gossip and porn and are amused by AMC's sexcapades. It's the kind of space where the norm is to out-outrageous each other, and over-the-top acts are rewarded with praise (a familiar tale in all kinds of young gay social groups).

4) AMC, whatever his promises to RDD around exclusivity (possibly there are none at all), is sexually active with others too. He meets ST, a visiting German political student, and they have sex. AMC hatches a plan to have sex in a famous Senate hearing room -- which will allow him to tell a tale to his friends that will top them all (pun sort of intended). AMC will reserve the room in Cardin's name, and it seems foolproof because it's not the kind of place anyone else would go into if reserved at some late hour. ST agrees to go along with this plan.

5) At some point in late 2023, possibly during the week of December 11th, AMC may or may not have shouted a controversial and highly charged statement at a US rep who was being interviewed. In any case, news breaks that he is the staffer who yelled at the representative.

6) On or about December 13th, AMC and ST fulfill their plan and have sex in the Senate hearing room. AMC posts a still-photo reel of their encounter to "close friends" on Instagram. That reel expires within 24 hours. He also shares a 7-second vid of the encounter in the WhatsApp group.

7) On December 15th, somebody in that WA group sends the vid to The Daily Caller, or somebody that person shared it with does this (or someone that person shared it with does this). TDC publishes an article about the matter, which goes viral. Also on this evening, AMC posts a LinkedIn message, which he deletes on December 18th.

None of this seems the least bit implausible, with the exception of #5, which still seems murky but ultimately is unrelated to the rest of it, except as a possible motivator for the leak. What you've posted, to the extent I even understand it, does.

Great story but do you have anything to support all this background info lol
 
  • Like
Reactions: milo_N Milk
Even some online records still have them as married but these could just be out of date.
I finally figured out his name. But damn that took some traveling into parts of the internet where I don't normally go,
lol.

I get that y’all are curious but can we leave the poor guy alone. Just because his ex is involved in a scandal doesn’t mean you should be looking for his info like this. Dragging out his info like this puts him and his family at risk.
 
Great story but do you have anything to support all this background info lol
Uh, yes, obviously. Have you looked into any of this at all, or do you just like to make stuff up and give things the most implausible explanations you can dream up? Look into Occam's razor sometime (and, no, you don't shave with it). I second the person that implored you to take a break for a while. I'm done debating this with you unless you say something rational.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: lukaeber
I get that y’all are curious but can we leave the poor guy alone. Just because his ex is involved in a scandal doesn’t mean you should be looking for his info like this. Dragging out his info like this puts him and his family at risk.
I think your point is fair. He wasn't involved in the situation that is under investigation. For that reason I didn't use his name here.
 
Here is what happened, to the best of our knowledge. I know you want to see a conspiracy, so I'm not going to go on and on about this with you. But this is the timeline:

1) Sometime within the last few years, perhaps as recently as the last year: RDD and AMC begin some kind of sexual, probably romantic, relationship.

2) RDD creates or already has a Twitter alt, where he posts videos and photos of sex with AMC. No one obviously uses their real names and RDD never shows his face, although AMC shows his face at least once.

3) AMC, an out and proud newish congressional staffer, is part of a whole milieu of horny young gay guys, who stay in touch with at least one WhatsApp group, dishing the tea like any other young gay set, except that they also happen to work in and around one of the most famous places in the world. The men in the WA group share gossip and porn and are amused by AMC's sexcapades. It's the kind of space where the norm is to out-outrageous each other, and over-the-top acts are rewarded with praise (a familiar tale in all kinds of young gay social groups).

4) AMC, whatever his promises to RDD around exclusivity (possibly there are none at all), is sexually active with others too. He meets ST, a visiting German political student, and they have sex. AMC hatches a plan to have sex in a famous Senate hearing room -- which will allow him to tell a tale to his friends that will top them all (pun sort of intended). AMC will reserve the room in Cardin's name, and it seems foolproof because it's not the kind of place anyone else would go into if reserved at some late hour. ST agrees to go along with this plan.

5) At some point in late 2023, possibly during the week of December 11th, AMC may or may not have shouted a controversial and highly charged statement at a US rep who was being interviewed. In any case, news breaks that he is the staffer who yelled at the representative.

6) On or about December 13th, AMC and ST fulfill their plan and have sex in the Senate hearing room. AMC posts a still-photo reel of their encounter to "close friends" on Instagram. That reel expires within 24 hours. He also shares a 7-second vid of the encounter in the WhatsApp group.

7) On December 15th, somebody in that WA group sends the vid to The Daily Caller, or somebody that person shared it with does this (or someone that person shared it with does this). TDC publishes an article about the matter, which goes viral. Also on this evening, AMC posts a LinkedIn message, which he deletes on December 18th.

None of this seems the least bit implausible, with the exception of #5, which still seems murky but ultimately is unrelated to the rest of it, except as a possible motivator for the leak. What you've posted, to the extent I even understand it, does.
JoeRoscoe;

Your prose leads me to think you have a legal background...
 
I get that y’all are curious but can we leave the poor guy alone. Just because his ex is involved in a scandal doesn’t mean you should be looking for his info like this. Dragging out his info like this puts him and his family at risk.

Sucks, but kinda seems like a risk you take when getting involved with a dude way less mature than yourself and posting it online. Some could argue that this kind of stuff shows someone’s true character. Doesn’t seem like much of an ex either considering even though their xxx twitters are deleted they were still posting stuff a couple weeks ago.


I also did not use his name, and only gave a vague hint about where one could find his name if it was that important for them to know.