The $10,000 10-inch challenge

MY MAIN POINT IS : not finding a legit meassured 10inch dick on this thread isn’t proof for its non existence.

Neither the thread starter nor one offering the money think they don't exist. Very few say its impossible. But you should have seen how rampant it was to claim having 10, 11, 12 inch cocks on this forum. Those claims have mysteriously vanished since the thread started. And it's slowly rippling across the internet. I saw mention on reddit and another forum about it. It's pulling people back to reality.
 
Neither the thread starter nor one offering the money think they don't exist. Very few say its impossible. But you should have seen how rampant it was to claim having 10, 11, 12 inch cocks on this forum. Those claims have mysteriously vanished since the thread started. And it's slowly rippling across the internet. I saw mention on reddit and another forum about it. It's pulling people back to reality.
And that’s awesome man it’s really good! It’s a reality check! Totally behind that.

I don’t know the intentions of the thread starter nor the one who offered money so I can’t say anything about that.

I just wanted to make my point that this doesn’t disprove 10inches in general since its very evident that lots of people posting here use this thread as evidence for non existence or myth (comparing it with the Loch Ness monster or yeti for example xD ) that kinda goes to far into the other extrem.
 
Please quote correctly! Wolfgang Bühman said there is no meassured 25cm to his knowledge! He also stated that 22cm happens 1 in 10.000 furthermore he said bigger size are even rarer. He never said however that 25 and bigger doesn’t exist!
His exact words in an interview were
"25 Zentimeter gibt es nicht." which tranlates to "25cm penises don't exist"
Nothing like "to his knowledge" or something similar was said in this interview.

To the facts. Read the Ansell study.
From the limited data science has so far on erect cock size (limited compared the the amount of data on other parts of human anatomy) the human penis size mean is 5.877 inches with a standard deviation of .825 inches therefor with the cummulativ distribution function you can calculate the occurrence of possible cock sizes. I don’t recall the precise number. But 10inches ended up at sth like 1 in several dozen million
Seriously? You rely on the lifestyles study? We are talking about nbpel here, which ansell didn't measure. The real average for that is about 5.1-5.2" (with a SD of 0.65"). Measured in clinical studies. Not in a tent at springbreak like the ansell one. 10" would be more than 7 SD's (about 7.38 to be more precise) above the average. Assuming a normal distribution which is quite ok for penis size 5 SD is 1 in about 1.7 million. 6 SD already is 1 in about 500 million. 7 SD is already at a higher number than the whole male population on the planet. Does that meant there definitely is no 10"? No! But it does mean that it's highly unlikely. And faaaaaaaaaar away from your 1 in several dozen millions.
 
His exact words in an interview were
"25 Zentimeter gibt es nicht." which tranlates to "25cm penises don't exist"
Nothing like "to his knowledge" or something similar was in said in this interview.


Seriously? You rely on the lifestyles study? We are talking about nbpel here, which ansell didn't measure. The real average for that is about 5.1-5.2" (with a SD of 0.65"). Measured in clinical studies. Not in a tent at springbreak like the ansell one. 10" would be more than 7 SD's (about 7.38 to be more precise) above the average. 5 SD is 1 in about 1.7 million. 6 SD already is 1 in about 500 million. 7 SD is already at a higher number than the whole male population on the planet. Does that meant there definitely is no 10"? No! But it does mean that it's highly unlikely. And faaaaaaaaaar away from your 1 in severl dozen millions.

Thanks For translating I’m speaking fluent German tho.
You apparently read the shortened interview that was published in a daily newspaper (not very evidence worthy) . He didn’t claim that. Also the guy you quoting put 21cm at 1 in 10.000 which is way different from your second statement.

Also I feel like u still don’t get my point! All I’m saying this thread does not disprove 10inches
 
Indeed those forums also have the purpose of showing off what you have. But if they didn’t have it doesn’t mean it doesn’t exist. Take the fabergé eggs example. Imagine (this an imagined example) a forum of fabergé egg collectors: they show of what they have and also search for the missing 6 eggs. But just because no one on that forum has one of the lost eggs doesn’t mean they don’t exist. One Could be laying around like one of the recently found eggs in a little house in the countryside in the Midwest where the man living there had no idea what it was. Same can be true for 10inches.
Those 6 eggs must have been documented then which cannot be said about 10-inch cocks.
 
Thanks For translating I’m speaking fluent German tho.
You apparently read the shortened interview that was published in a daily newspaper (not very evidence worthy) . He didn’t claim that. Also the guy you quoting put 21cm at 1 in 10.000 which is way different from your second statement.

Also I feel like u still don’t get my point! All I’m saying this thread does not disprove 10inches
You don't understand that it never was the point to disprove the existance. But you try to convince us that there are with nothing but urban myths and zero evidence. That's the problem.

Btw, his statement of 21cm being 1 in 10.000 does actually not contradict my statement at all if he was talking about bpel (which is standard most of the time, just not here in this thread). Then it would be 3.77 SD above the average. 4 SD is 1 in almost 16.000.
 
Last edited:
You don't understand that it never was the point to disprove the existance. But you try to convince us that there are with nothing but urban myths and zero evidence. That's the problem.
If it’s not the point to disprove 10inches why u try so hard to argue against everyone? Evidence is the size distribution combined with the studies about size. As several posters already stated before that’s evidence that it’s very rar and unlickely but indeed possible.
 
Thanks For translating I’m speaking fluent German tho.
You apparently read the shortened interview that was published in a daily newspaper (not very evidence worthy) . He didn’t claim that. Also the guy you quoting put 21cm at 1 in 10.000 which is way different from your second statement.

Also I feel like u still don’t get my point! All I’m saying this thread does not disprove 10inches
And NOBODY has claimed this thread disproves 10 inches. Still a straw man argument.

And we have yet to see any evidence of any man ever having ten inches. So even if it's possible, it's not been witnessed with anything remotely approaching plausibility.

Yet you dismissed the thread offhand, calling it "ridiculous", claiming erroneously and repeatedly that its intent is to "disprove" the possibility.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 693987
If it’s not the point to disprove 10inches why u try so hard to argue against everyone? Evidence is the size distribution combined with the studies about size. As several posters already stated before that’s evidence that it’s very rar and unlickely but indeed possible.
If the studies and statistical calculations are evidence (which they are not unless they measure a 10") I just have proven that 10" are nonexistant since 10" would be 7.38 SD above average which would mean 1 in a way higher number than all male human beings that ever existed.
You really need to understand the difference between theory and reality. Those statistical calculations are NO evidence.

I'm fighting idiotic nonsense (Falcon i.e.). Not the existance of 10".
 
If the studies and statistical calculations are evidence (which they are not unless they measure a 10") I just have proven that 10" are nonexistant since 10" would be 7.38 SD above average which would mean 1 in a way higher number than all male human beings that ever existed.
You really need to understand the difference between theory and reality.

I'm fighting idiotic nonsense (Falcon i.e.). Not the existance of 10".
Kern erstmal storchastik verstehen bevor du du einen Unsinn erzählst
 
If the studies and statistical calculations are evidence (which they are not unless they measure a 10") I just have proven that 10" are nonexistant since 10" would be 7.38 SD above average which would mean 1 in a way higher number than all male human beings that ever existed.
You really need to understand the difference between theory and reality. Those statistical calculations are NO evidence.

I'm fighting idiotic nonsense (Falcon i.e.). Not the existance of 10".
Why u argue with me then? We agree! 10 is possible. This thread doesn’t disprove it. End of discussion
 
Kern erstmal storchastik verstehen bevor du du einen Unsinn erzählst
You should learn to spell it before you tell someone who studied maths that he doesn't understand it. I'm just using your level of logic and already said that it's nonsense. Oh boy...

Why u argue with me then? We agree! 10 is possible. This thread doesn’t disprove it. End of discussion
So you went from 10" are proven to 10" is possible? Good to know. You're a tool.
 
  • Like
Reactions: MisterB
You should learn to spell it before you tell someone who studied maths that he doesn't understand it. I'm just using your level of logic and already said that it's nonsense. Oh boy...


So you went from 10" are proven to 10" is possible? Good to know. You're a tool.
Good for you! I studied genetics and bio engineering. If 10 is possible and we use the law of huge numbers which you should know if you indeed studied maths.....