Not talking about some pixels. But with your experience I am pretty sure you will spot it. Try some ELA if needed.
The $10,000 10-inch challenge
- Thread starter drambone2001
- Start date
- sdp,
https://i.imgur.com/9lzu6Io.jpg
The higher resolution version doesn't look any less shopped IMO.
With a gamma boost to make it less dark:
![9lzu6Io.png]( "9lzu6Io.png")
I can't tell exactly what's going on in that area, but it certainly doesn't look right.
The higher resolution version doesn't look any less shopped IMO.
With a gamma boost to make it less dark:
I can't tell exactly what's going on in that area, but it certainly doesn't look right.
Think about it for a moment. it does matter. And again, I'm not saying more, as there are dumbasses who don't need to learn basic techniques here. There's enough fakery without us giving methods away.
No, it doesn't look right at all.
Why does a tape nearly touching the floor, directly below the light source reflecting back up, not create any shadow at all? A little MrShadow1n Effect there...
There are other shadow problems throughout.
And the left edge of the tape is fucked up, from the 29-32cm marks. It veers out mysteriously. Sloppy, sloppy.
Yeah... or... which is more likely ... you have absolutely no idea
Yeah, called lens focus.
Why does it matter so much to you? I wonder why youre having problems accepting that theres 9+ inchers?
I think most people agree that there are 9 inch penises. The one in the image you posted is not 9+ inches, the image was altered.
I wonder why you're having problems accepting that the image was manipulated when multiple people have pointed out to you exactly what indicates that the image has been modified.
I wonder why you're having problems accepting that the image was manipulated when multiple people have pointed out to you exactly what indicates that the image has been modified.
Looks to be 7 1/2" x 6'ish.
If You can zoom in that close. That weird outline along the fabric tape and not one curve or wrinkle. Like said before. Pulled tight even when not being pulled with 2 hands.
Some weird outline appears again on the left side of his shaft.
And If held at a perfect level. Using 2 inches ad a guide line for width? The length comes around 7 1/4 x 7 1/2" . guesstimated.
And if course the shadowing. Or the lack of.
And finally. We all know it didn't reach 10 so why us Mr. Defensive defending this dick so much?
It didn't qualify anyhow!
If You can zoom in that close. That weird outline along the fabric tape and not one curve or wrinkle. Like said before. Pulled tight even when not being pulled with 2 hands.
Some weird outline appears again on the left side of his shaft.
And If held at a perfect level. Using 2 inches ad a guide line for width? The length comes around 7 1/4 x 7 1/2" . guesstimated.
And if course the shadowing. Or the lack of.
And finally. We all know it didn't reach 10 so why us Mr. Defensive defending this dick so much?
It didn't qualify anyhow!
I think the whole thing could be put to rest if we could see the rest of the guy's pictures.
Or you have no experience at all since you don't seem to spot the obvious flaws. Did you do some ELA by now? I guess not. Do you even know what ELA means?Yeah... or... which is more likely ... you have absolutely no idea
Yeah... or... which is more likely ... you have absolutely no idea
Yeah, called lens focus.
Why does it matter so much to you? I wonder why youre having problems accepting that theres 9+ inchers?
Going for the ad hominem? Why?
How does my participation in a discussion equate to it mattering "so much"? I could easily ask why you're defending a random photo. And how does my discussing the validity of one photo equate to problems accepting the existence of 9" penises?
You know this thread isn't about 9 inch penises. I've never expressed any doubt there are 9 inch penises. I can cite several members of this forum who have one or are very close.
The question is: why, when you know the regulars immediately dismiss anything under 10", would you present just that? To what end?
I, and several others here, seriously doubt the validity of this photo. But it's still irrelevant to the contest.
And lens focus doesn't do what happened here, especially nearly dead-center in the photo, and especially when everything around it is unaffected. It also doesn't explain the shadow or lack thereof. We can see all around the tape where it curls. There should be some indication of a shadow somewhere below it. But only if it was in the original photo.
Im not defending it
I said its real, but u replied again and again saying its not without bringing any evidence.
I used a engine for exif and pixel tests and the analyse says the picture is unaltered so yes as long as theres no evidence against it im right.
Yes it is real. And i have 15 years of experience as a graphic editor
Yeah... or... which is more likely ... you have absolutely no idea
Yeah, called lens focus.
Why does it matter so much to you? I wonder why youre having problems accepting that theres 9+ inchers?
Not defending it? The question is the photo's authenticity, whether it has been altered. You, "said its real", which is defending its authenticity, and have spent an entire page claiming it isn't altered.
That's bullshit and you know it. Even freeware analysis software deems this a probable fake, and that the image was created by an editor.
Just stop. You're embarrassing yourself.
You need an engine for the exif data? And you tested your mobile or display for dead pixels? ELA analysis shows pretty obvious problems. So please stop embarassing yourself. Little hint, the tape below the thumb and above the thumb were not created at the same time.
I could probably just google it but curious what software do you personally use for that? I'd love a somewhat reliable way of analysing pics.
they used a old camera trick by overlaying one photo on top of another using a remote to prevent vibration or even slight movement
just like those photos people make bogus claims of having a ghost on the photo when was the last time a ghost was caught on a digital camera
Judging by the particular size, I'd say it's from the "post challenge" era if that narrows it down.
Nosuportneeded
Superior Member
- Joined
- Jul 2, 2014
- Posts
- 3,125
- Media
- 26
- Likes
- 5,262
- Points
- 158
- Location
- West Virginia, USA
- Sexuality
- 100% Straight, 0% Gay
- Gender
- Male
Judging by the particular size, I'd say it's from the "post challenge" era if that narrows it down.
...challenge era...
Love it
For this I used a free tool, the first Bing hit I found, possibly fotoforensics, because I was on my tablet on a job site. For the real deal, Amped Authenticate. But for the dick pics here, you rarely need to analyze with software. The fakes here are nearly always apparent to the naked eye. I only checked this one because hive was pushing the issue.
