The $10,000 10-inch challenge

[hivelpsg]

Not defending it? The question is the photo's authenticity, whether it has been altered. You, "said its real", which is defending its authenticity, and have spent an entire page claiming it isn't altered.



That's bullshit and you know it. Even freeware analysis software deems this a probable fake, and that the image was created by an editor.

Just stop. You're embarrassing

Not defending it? The question is the photo's authenticity, whether it has been altered. You, "said its real", which is defending its authenticity, and have spent an entire page claiming it isn't altered.



That's bullshit and you know it. Even freeware analysis software deems this a probable fake, and that the image was created by an editor.

Just stop. You're embarrassing yourself.

You are defending your opinion that its fake. I only sticked to mine. You could just have stopped replying and there would be 0 answers from me.
You say its fake i say its real. Isnt it pretty obvious that i dont care what you say ?

 

[hivelpsg]

Not defending it? The question is the photo's authenticity, whether it has been altered. You, "said its real", which is defending its authenticity, and have spent an entire page claiming it isn't altered.



That's bullshit and you know it. Even freeware analysis software deems this a probable fake, and that the image was created by an editor.

Just stop. You're embarrassing yourself.

Omg as u can see dozens of converters were used on that image doh. Twitter, Tumblr and several forums ran it thu conversion . Check the timestamp and encoding process. You actually have no idea how image processing works.

 

[ItsAll4Kim]

You are defending your opinion that its fake. I only sticked to mine. You could just have stopped replying and there would be 0 answers from me.
You say its fake i say its real. Isnt it pretty obvious that i dont care what you say ?

Now you have a reading comprehension problem? You claimed that you aren't defending the authenticity of the photo. Over a half dozen replies from you say otherwise.

You care enough to continue responding to me.

 

[ItsAll4Kim]

Omg as u can see dozens of converters were used on that image doh. Twitter, Tumblr and several forums ran it thu conversion . Check the timestamp and encoding process. You actually have no idea how image processing works.

But none of that has any bearing on the photos problems. I told you from the start I wasn't going to discuss the issues, and I haven't. You keep jumping at easy targets and ignoring the points that you can't explain.

You said you checked the original. If you have it, why are you posting an old copy?

On second thought, don't bother answering. This is pointless.

 

[Snakebyte]

Isnt it pretty obvious that i dont care what you say ?

So in other words you don't care about facts?

Omg as u can see dozens of converters were used on that image doh. Twitter, Tumblr and several forums ran it thu conversion . Check the timestamp and encoding process. You actually have no idea how image processing works.

In how far does that explain that different parts of the image were not processed at the same time at all? Or were processed more often than others? You didn't answer a single question that doesn't fit your agenda.

 

[hivelpsg]

So in other words you don't care about facts?

In how far does that explain that different parts of the image were not processed at the same time at all? Or were processed more often than others? You didn't answer a single question that doesn't fit your agenda.

Thats the funniest thing i ever heard. Partly processing images. Haha. It was converted as one in like 30 different converters. Theres no way to tell its different parts in a technical way or that it was processed more than other parts. Show me a engine that does it and i give u the 10k hahaha. You have ZERO technical knowledge.

 

[Snakebyte]

Thats the funniest thing i ever heard. Partly processing images. Haha. It was converted as one in like 30 different converters. Theres no way to tell its different parts in a technical way or that it was processed more than other parts. Show me a engine that does it and i give u the 10k hahaha. You have ZERO technical knowledge.

Every single time an image is processed it loses some detail. Minimum fragments of detail but still. If a specific part is altered it will show. You probably know that the university of Saarbrücken is excellent in graphic stuff. So if you got no clue, you shouldn't talk so big. I won't repeat that you should compare the tape above and below the thumb. I don't know if you actually got the skills to even do it. I remember I had you on ignore. Now I remember why.

 

[ItsAll4Kim]

So here we are, just a bit more than a month shy of two years. Has there been an entry, even if it was controversial, that was ten inches or over? Perhaps we need a Hall of Fame/Shame. But I'm hard-pressed to recall any serious entry.

 

[Clod]

So here we are, just a bit more than a month shy of two years. Has there been an entry, even if it was controversial, that was ten inches or over? Perhaps we need a Hall of Fame/Shame. But I'm hard-pressed to recall any serious entry.

I honestly don’t think any entries have been 9”. I think it’s quite possible that no user on this site is currently 9 nbp. The closest contenders to this challenge so far aside from Mandingo & Julio, who were invited but did not even participate, have been members of this site who didn’t even put their pics on here but were debated here anyway. I srsly think a 9” thread would have similar results unless maybe a couple people here went on an intense diet or Ol’ Fred Dingo himself decides to put his dick in the ring.

 

[Evenflow618]

There are no 10 inchers I always knew it’s not possible. My dick is considered big but needs a lot of blood to fill up. It’s just not possible to fill a whole 10 inches with blood and girth. To go further my gf had a friend who said they were 10 inches on their phone I showed my dick they thought I was 11. So drop the thread

 

[hivelpsg]

Every single time an image is processed it loses some detail. Minimum fragments of detail but still. If a specific part is altered it will show. You probably know that the university of Saarbrücken is excellent in graphic stuff. So if you got no clue, you shouldn't talk so big. I won't repeat that you should compare the tape above and below the thumb. I don't know if you actually got the skills to even do it. I remember I had you on ignore. Now I remember why.

It will lose exaxtly the amount of fragments as the rest of the image just a fact.

 

[hivelpsg]

I honestly don’t think any entries have been 9”. I think it’s quite possible that no user on this site is currently 9 nbp. The closest contenders to this challenge so far aside from Mandingo & Julio, who were invited but did not even participate, have been members of this site who didn’t even put their pics on here but were debated here anyway. I srsly think a 9” thread would have similar results unless maybe a couple people here went on an intense diet or Ol’ Fred Dingo himself decides to put his dick in the ring.

I think even if there would be a real 10" it would not be accepted and called fake or they use measurement standards that are far from the ones used in real studies. It would require a 11" to count as 10" here.

 

[Nothin-on-me73]

A decade or so long ago I won't tabulate it, I started some P.E.
To this day after I basically squashed my dick so hard it exploded in girth, it remains to this day.
My point is if you start young and go for another 4 or 5 years I'm sure some guys hit 10" or beyond by mangling the tissue, healing and repeating during puberty.
Now what guy can do that without his parents being all "wtf are you doing in there!??!" and disrupting progress?
Guys in 3rd world countries mostly.

My point is, I think you can stretch length and hyper inflate girth until your fun parts are just ridiculous but the odds of living in a culture where you are unbothered to achieve this are literally 3rd world or, a 1st world fatherless ghetto.

I reached about 7 and 7/8" when I'm in good shape and my girth can hit 6.5 to 7" because of that bout of "squashing" around 15. The bigger you get?
The easier it is to perform P.E.
So I don't think it's far fetched for some guy that's 5'6 to stretch and grind himself above 10" but take this as a warning.
With a woman my dick is hard as a diamond.
By myself I really have to focus and get lost in fantasy to achieve equivalent for several minutes.
If you mutilate your dick through P.E. techniques during puberty, you better for damn sure be into the woman you are with regularly if you expect to have a rock hard dick that pushes her into orgasmic euphoria assuming she can even withstand it!

At roughly 8" most women see what I have and go into a laughter of "omg wtf...." so beyond that majority are gonna run the fuck away man.
I think these guys at 10" and beyond exist but they've fucked up their bodies to a level that the only partners that can tolerate them are gay men. You are literally building a dick restricting you to being gay or at least, hanging 2-3" outside a woman making the excess utterly worthless.

 

[Nothin-on-me73]

Dam , I thought I got banned for getting. Emo .. ( it happens ) . ....responding to this. Guys post .. what the .hell ?

 

[INCUBUS]

Dam , I thought I got banned for getting. Emo .. ( it happens ) . ....responding to this. Guys post .. what the .hell ?

And your post has what to do with this Thread?

 

[Gj816]

And your post has what to do with this Thread?
View attachment 10435151

 

[ItsAll4Kim]

I think even if there would be a real 10" it would not be accepted and called fake or they use measurement standards that are far from the ones used in real studies. It would require a 11" to count as 10" here.

The measurement standard is spelled out clearly multiple times throughout the thread, and is the best method we could use for this medium, but isn't remotely "far from the ones used in real studies." The only difference here is that non-bone-pressed is required, and that's to minimize the ability to hide a cut-down ruler in the fat pad. Some studies use non-bone-pressed measurements as well.

-a ruler rather than a soft tape isn't different...you don't use a soft tape for a bone-pressed measurement.
-measuring from on top rather than to the side or bottom: exactly the same.
-measuring while standing rather than seated: exactly the same.
-measuring with the penis straight out rather than pushed down or to the side: still exactly the same.
-requiring the photo to be taken from directly above: this only differs in that "real studies" aren't relying upon a photo. This concession is obviouslay to avoid playing games with camera angles.

So what, exactly, is "far"?

Nobody here is trying to NOT find a winner. The woman putting up the money really does want a winner, and expected several, early, not to be here nearly two years later with not a single entry that's remotely close. And if any of us seem jaded, cranky, or negative, it's because we're tired of liars blowing smoke up our asses. I'd like nothing more than to put this thread to bed with a winner.

 

[blonk]

Question for tinyprincess: About how many men have you come across in person that meet, exceed, or come close to the 10" mark since this thread was started?

 

[Clod]

Question for tinyprincess: About how many men have you come across in person that meet, exceed, or come close to the 10" mark since this thread was started?

So far they've failed to prove any correlation between dick size and foot length, hand width, race, or any of the other supposed tell-tale signs. Yet, with posts like this one on this site, I can't help but think it tends to be inversely correlated with I.Q. I mean, come on man...

 

[hivelpsg]

The measurement standard is spelled out clearly multiple times throughout the thread, and is the best method we could use for this medium, but isn't remotely "far from the ones used in real studies." The only difference here is that non-bone-pressed is required, and that's to minimize the ability to hide a cut-down ruler in the fat pad. Some studies use non-bone-pressed measurements as well.

-a ruler rather than a soft tape isn't different...you don't use a soft tape for a bone-pressed measurement.
-measuring from on top rather than to the side or bottom: exactly the same.
-measuring while standing rather than seated: exactly the same.
-measuring with the penis straight out rather than pushed down or to the side: still exactly the same.
-requiring the photo to be taken from directly above: this only differs in that "real studies" aren't relying upon a photo. This concession is obviouslay to avoid playing games with camera angles.

So what, exactly, is "far"?

Nobody here is trying to NOT find a winner. The woman putting up the money really does want a winner, and expected several, early, not to be here nearly two years later with not a single entry that's remotely close. And if any of us seem jaded, cranky, or negative, it's because we're tired of liars blowing smoke up our asses. I'd like nothing more than to put this thread to bed with a winner.

Well theres up to 1 inch difference between BPEL and NBPEL. Makes a 10 incher a 9.