The $10,000 10-inch challenge

What’s unfair about asking for proof of 10” length? And how is asking for a simple length measurement more difficult than calculating volume? 🤷🏼‍♂️
How to standardized or define measuring techniques for anything is really hard (pun intended). And in competitive areas it’s essential for fairness. As I’ve argued before in this thread, anatomical variations like curvature complicates things . Using a hard ruler along the top of a curved penis sounds good because it’s an easy and simple method but it could lead to actually inaccurate measurements, as it doesn’t account for the curvature (yes I understand this has been argued to death, I still maintain the basic premise). Measuring that way can underestimate the “true” length. A flexible measuring tape or a piece of string contours along the curve which proves for a more accurate measurement. I don’t just say this from nothing. This approach is recommended by medical professionals for individuals with penile curvature. Most men have at least some small curve. ( How to Measure a Curved Penis: A Comprehensive Guid ) ( Measurement of Penis Curvature in Peyronie's Disease: Guide to Doctors and Patients - Peyronie's Disease )

Also the fat pad at the base of the penis can obscure the length, leading to underestimation if not accounted for. Pressing the measuring device into the pubic bone until mild resistance is felt is part of the standard medical measure technique and it ensures that the entire length is measured, compensating for the fat pad.

So. That said… that’s just about my thoughts on the problems with measuring a straight line for length. Personally I think that maybe measuring penile volume offers a better overall assessment of size. Volume calculations incorporate both length and girth, accounting for variations in shape and thickness. So maybe a more accurate and over encompassing representation of size. Tools like the Penis Size Calculator (calcsd) are well known and good for trying out measurements to see comparative volume and understand size relative to global averages, many men now use it as the standard size comparison tool.

TLDR I think volume measurements offer a more nuanced understanding of penis size, which may be more relevant in certain contexts. .
 
How to standardized or define measuring techniques for anything is really hard (pun intended). And in competitive areas it’s essential for fairness. As I’ve argued before in this thread, anatomical variations like curvature complicates things . Using a hard ruler along the top of a curved penis sounds good because it’s an easy and simple method but it could lead to actually inaccurate measurements, as it doesn’t account for the curvature (yes I understand this has been argued to death, I still maintain the basic premise). Measuring that way can underestimate the “true” length. A flexible measuring tape or a piece of string contours along the curve which proves for a more accurate measurement. I don’t just say this from nothing. This approach is recommended by medical professionals for individuals with penile curvature. Most men have at least some small curve. ( How to Measure a Curved Penis: A Comprehensive Guid ) ( Measurement of Penis Curvature in Peyronie's Disease: Guide to Doctors and Patients - Peyronie's Disease )

Also the fat pad at the base of the penis can obscure the length, leading to underestimation if not accounted for. Pressing the measuring device into the pubic bone until mild resistance is felt is part of the standard medical measure technique and it ensures that the entire length is measured, compensating for the fat pad.

So. That said… that’s just about my thoughts on the problems with measuring a straight line for length. Personally I think that maybe measuring penile volume offers a better overall assessment of size. Volume calculations incorporate both length and girth, accounting for variations in shape and thickness. So maybe a more accurate and over encompassing representation of size. Tools like the Penis Size Calculator (calcsd) are well known and good for trying out measurements to see comparative volume and understand size relative to global averages, many men now use it as the standard size comparison tool.

TLDR I think volume measurements offer a more nuanced understanding of penis size, which may be more relevant in certain contexts. .
You can write as many essays full of fancy words and quoting reports etc., but the plain truth is that the OP is offering $10k for 10" length, plain and simple. Most people use simple length measurement as their dick size barometer, why complicate matters?

If you think this isn't fair why don't you start a thread offering $10k for a certain volume?
 
You can write as many essays full of fancy words and quoting reports etc., but the plain truth is that the OP is offering $10k for 10" length, plain and simple. Most people use simple length measurement as their dick size barometer, why complicate matters?

If you think this isn't fair why don't you start a thread offering $10k for a certain volume?
A thread for volume sounds like a good idea though maybe I'll consider it when I have $10k to spare
 
  • Wow
Reactions: fuzzyis
  • Like
Reactions: MisterB and JGUIDO
Why not? It would make more sense for women.

As for this thread, it's a challenge for length.
Because it would lead to even more cheating. Let’s assume there is an easy method of measuring volume (I am not aware of any), I am certain there will be men out there pumping their penis to death for getting that bigger volume measurement.

Pumped penises I have seen in porn are floppy, loosing girth quite fast and as far as I understand people usually prefer a rigid penis over some floppy sausage.

If not measuring volume directly, you would need to add at least one tape measurement creating more margin for error (cheating). Also girth is never 100% the same over the entire length of the penis.
 
I’m not against a separate, “volume” style thread, but I think Instead of seeing lots of people using photoshop like you do here, it would just open the door to avid “pumpers” and unnatural girth, with poor erectile quality.

Girth is so easy to enhance in comparison to length from everything I’ve seen and read. Whether it’s the most common form of over pumping, or even more extreme things like implants or fillers. Length measuring, even with its faults and question marks over penile shape and curves, is much more of a standard. And less easy to make major gains in size.

Even looking at it from a women’s perspective…would an edema filled, pumped up 7” girth feel bigger than a natural 6-6.5” inch girth with a much stronger erection? I highly doubt it. It’s like comparing a solid dildo to a spongy loofah.
 
Even looking at it from a women’s perspective…would an edema filled, pumped up 7” girth feel bigger than a natural 6-6.5” inch girth with a much stronger erection? I highly doubt it. It’s like comparing a solid dildo to a spongy loofah.

Agreed 100%. To take an educated guess at it, I think most women would prefer even a 5" girth with rock hard erection quality over a 7" girth bloofy loofah penis. If they preferred the latter, we'd likely have evolved to have that instead. Size is an interesting subject because of its visual nature, and it's simply easier to compare sizes of objects. But guys losing EQ to make their dick "bigger" are conflating priorities.

Sure, there are some legit size queens out there, but even then, they want it to get properly hard. Yet we still got members turning their members into dick balloons.
 
Agreed 100%. To take an educated guess at it, I think most women would prefer even a 5" girth with rock hard erection quality over a 7" girth bloofy loofah penis. If they preferred the latter, we'd likely have evolved to have that instead. Size is an interesting subject because of its visual nature, and it's simply easier to compare sizes of objects. But guys losing EQ to make their dick "bigger" are conflating priorities.

Sure, there are some legit size queens out there, but even then, they want it to get properly hard. Yet we still got members turning their members into dick balloons.

I remember seeing a video where a girl looked at Shane Diesel's penis in horror at the thought of it going into her only to grab it with her hand and with a relieved smile say "It's squishy!" Wish i could remember which scene that was.
 
Is this guy a candidate for the 10 inch challenge? Links - 12 Incher On Reddit. Orpheo Wonder Huge Cock. This guy has been commented here and a lot of people comment that he is using camera tricks, look at how his stomach bends around his cock in the first part of the video.

I've been aware of him since he started some years ago under a different name and it's never looked quite right but imo I think it's a mix of actually hung, short, editing and angles combined in most media. In the most normal looking pics I've seen I'd guess like 8" considering height and some shots where angles and morphing would be far more obvious if he was just average.

Either way he likes to show off, has been in big dick communities on reddit, twitter for years so probably knows about this, but hasn't come to collect. The same with every other candidate suggested so far, when it comes to it if they were 10 inches and they're posting on the internet, they'd post here and make some easy money 😅 Tbf he doesn't make any claim on his size other than "huge".
 
Is this guy a candidate for the 10 inch challenge? Links - 12 Incher On Reddit. Orpheo Wonder Huge Cock. This guy has been commented here and a lot of people comment that he is using camera tricks, look at how his stomach bends around his cock in the first part of the video.
It's not camera tricks, it's editing. He simply vertically enlarges a section of the frame along the cock. As a result everything else that's in the same section will look distorted.
 
It's not camera tricks, it's editing. He simply vertically enlarges a section of the frame along the cock. As a result everything else that's in the same section will look distorted.
Exactly!. When you look at his video when he is playing the guitar the legs look huge and not in proportion to his body. He is using tricks too fool everyone with his size.
 
It's not camera tricks, it's editing. He simply vertically enlarges a section of the frame along the cock. As a result everything else that's in the same section will look distorted.
Yeah I did say editing... which he combines in many pics/vids with selective camera angles to exaggerate the effect (the funniest I saw he'd captioned that he could suck himself but you could easily see he'd just lined the angle up and his face was miles away 😂). It's a shame people with actually big dicks still feel the need to do all that to pretend it's an unrealistic size, especially now we've got this thread putting an upper limit on what's realistic.

He's quite dedicated to it, interesting to see him disappear, pop up with a new handle a few times. One of the more persistent people, they usually disappear after a year or two if editing so heavily, must get boring unless they can get a good onlyfans going.