The $10,000 10-inch challenge

Posts Attachments
Sort by date Most Liked Posts
TinyPrincess said:
Dear @Englishmansabroad

The ToS explicitly allows for photoshopped pictures, so guys like MrShadow1n are in their right to post enhanced pictures.

There is however nothing in the ToS prohibiting mentioning that a certain picture is enhanced or a certain user is enhancing his pictures.

This thread isn't baiting anyone. Drambone made a very simple challenge - only rule is show an honest 10 inches... The little word honest implies absolutely no photoshopping or faking. So while shopping and faking are within the terms in general, it's outside the scope of this particular thread.

You might dream of being a mod (just apply for it), you might think this is Reddit, and you might think photoshopped is cool. You certainly doubt all the premises for this particular thread, so why do you keep posting in it? Derailment? Trolling? Or what?

So far all you have posted have been attacks on all but one of the members in the thread.

If you don't like the thread, ask a mod to close it or leave it. Either way we all will be better of - and the thread can return to supporting 10" members without your negativity.
Click to expand...
Almost all of that is wrong. I certainly haven't attacked everyone who contributed, as anyone can see. The only attacks and negativity are from 3 people here, for something you know isn't against the rules, and the premise of the thread , $10,000, is almost certainly a fiction, and itself dishonest ( and hypocritical). Otherwise you'd show proof. The only negativity is coming from the people your defending, and your not supporting anyone- how can you support so someone you say doesn't exist?
 
  • Like
Reactions: MrHUGE1n
Snakebyte said:
Of course there is a correlation between FSL and BPEL you fool. But there are significant differences in both for some guys. So it is no way of predicting the erect length. Get an academic access and read the actual studies instead of Veale. Veal has a gazillion of flaws.
Nobody is baiting people. It's only you being an asshole 24/7. Nobody cares about Reddit. You don't like it here? Gtfo. You have no fucking clue what LPSG used to be for almost a decade. You just recently joined and behave like a know-it-all. Did you find Jonah yet?
That's all I will say to you. You're a waste of time. Bye bye.

P.S.:
Fortunately you are no mod. You obviously even didn't read the ToS.
Click to expand...
So now you know better than the researchers in one of the latest meta studies ( based on your usual incohereant, evidence free logic), but I'm the kno- all?. GTFO yourself idiot...

Oh, and you used that Jonah line before, and it wasn't funny the first time.

Bye, bye to you too.
 
  • Like
Reactions: MrHUGE1n
ItsAll4Kim said:
There's no psychobabble in stating that you are deflecting when I ask you directly, twice, to state what would be acceptable proof of an actual cash prize, and you respond with anything and everything but an actual answer to this question.

What would be acceptable tamper-proof evidence of the existence of a prize and that it would be paid?
Click to expand...
A small, Indian woman with a suitcase containing $10,000 appearing on camera, that's what, as I've said about a dozen times. Hardly rocket science pal.

But she won't because the cash ( and quite possibly the person), doesn't exist, anymore than a foot long dick does.
 
  • Like
Reactions: MrHUGE1n
Now where's my suitcase...

1.jpg
 
  • Like
Reactions: Nexolaris, lapdog2001, creek47 and 4 others
Englishmansabroad said:
A small, Indian woman with a suitcase containing $10,000 appearing on camera, that's what, as I've said about a dozen times. Hardly rocket science pal.

But she won't because the cash ( and quite possibly the person), doesn't exist, anymore than a foot long dick does.
Click to expand...

Pal?

That's not proof, you know it. And it isn't permitted by this site.

First, the Terms and rules are clear:
  • Accusing, suggesting or otherwise hinting that a member may not be as they claim to be (for example, suggesting that a female member is actually male) will not be tolerated.
Additionally, the Terms and Rules prohibit revealing one's true identity:
  • Content that has the potential of identifying a person, including yourself, such as phone numbers, facebook links, addresses and such is not allowed.
A video of someone showing enough of their face to somehow prove their ethnicity as "Indian" would easily reveal her identity. Not allowed.

Finally, a video of someone with a bundle of cash? Does she need to count it? How do we know it's actual money? And ignoring these impossibilities, how do we know that this person, who can't, due to the rules of this site, reveal her identity, will award the cash to a winner?

Try again, PAL.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Nexolaris, TinyPrincess and INCUBUS
Englishmansabroad said:
A small, Indian woman with a suitcase containing $10,000 appearing on camera, that's what, as I've said about a dozen times. Hardly rocket science pal.

But she won't because the cash ( and quite possibly the person), doesn't exist, anymore than a foot long dick does.
Click to expand...
Preach it bro.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Englishmansabroad
MrHUGE1n said:
id love for you to post measurements like mine (ALL ON TOP) I also have side measurements as well MANY IN MY GALLERY) to compare
Click to expand...
It's something like this, right? (But I'm not as good as you in handling the camera)
[video=medium]1343609[/video]
[video=medium]1343608[/video]

Who knew growing almost 2" would Be so quick xD

Also, I didn't find your side measurement (similar to mine) in your galery. Care to send it to me? (can Be via PM if People get upset here).
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ocine, sdp, Snakebyte and 2 others
Neller said:
I'd like to see a pic of $10,000 in suitcase just because of how stupid it would look. You can fit $10,000 in hundreds easily in your pocket.
Click to expand...
Yes, I realised that just after posting...It's confusing, as in England the biggest note is £50, which is about to be abolished, and which nobody used anyway, as we're all too poor....

Anyway, this thread is starting to bore me.It's just a silly game to distract from the obvious fact that if the cash was real, she could show herself and the money on cam on the site, which everyone knows would be totally different than obviously faked pics lifted from the net.You'd think adults had better things to do than offer one thing that doesn't exist for another thing that doesn't either. I certainly have.
 
TinyPrincess said:
But then even Subway is cheating I've been told... Nothing worse than being tricked by sandwich inches...
Click to expand...
Oh lord, they are awful. Do you have them in London? Horrible excuse for a sandwich. They literally count how many slices of meat and cheese go in a sandwich.
 
  • Like
Reactions: TinyPrincess
This is a very funny thread, that apparently is more focused on collecting pics of us members here, rather than anything else.

Happy to prove in kik or skype or in real life (I live in Manhattan, NYC).

Hugs and kisses,

Antonio.
 
DoubleDigit said:
This is a very funny thread, that apparently is more focused on collecting pics of us members here, rather than anything else.

Happy to prove in kik or skype or in real life (I live in Manhattan, NYC).

Hugs and kisses,

Antonio.
Click to expand...

Where anywhere does it say anyone is collecting pics of others.

Oh and I've seen your cam in chat you aren’t 10" or even near
 
  • Like
Reactions: Nexolaris, TinyPrincess and Snakebyte
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

kcdave
Eyes Like the Pool 10 Commandments of cock sucking
Replies
0
Views
345
Erotic Stories
kcdave
kcdave
dupont36
The massage
Replies
18
Views
4K
Erotic Stories
dupont36
dupont36
L
The Street Wanderer
Replies
0
Views
332
Erotic Stories
lickpenis
L
Stumpjumper310
The Next Step: Awkward Hookups
Replies
1
Views
431
Ask a Gay Man
theplayerking
T
S
The Sandnstrand Project
Replies
0
Views
215
OnlyFans and Web Personalities
Sandnstrand
S
Remove Ads
Top Bottom